yeah, keep smoking that seal blubber...
Printable View
Something similar...perhaps a bit lower?
The question asked is "Which of these best describes the way you think of yourself?" - there is no scope in that for any mix.
If asked that question, I would answer Northern Irish - an answer that I believe many Nationalists would give also.
Also interesting is that "Northern Irish" is the most popular identity amongst those surveyed who consider themselves of no religion.
Fair point.
With a lower-case 'n'... Sure! ;)Quote:
If asked that question, I would answer Northern Irish - an answer that I believe many Nationalists would give also.
Aye, but were they Catholic atheists or Protestant atheists? :pQuote:
Also interesting is that "Northern Irish" is the most popular identity amongst those surveyed who consider themselves of no religion.
My experience is different - increasingly, I find more and more folk from Catholic/Nationalist backgrounds identifying as Northern Irish.
If Northern Irish identity was left out of the equation, the folk who primarily identify as Northern Irish would revert to either "Irish" or "British".
Effectively, there are two subsets within the Northern Irish identity ie. Northern Irish/Irish and Northern Irish/British.
The Northern Irish identity seems capable of uniting people from different political/religious backgrounds moreso than either "Irish" or "British".
For me, that's no bad thing.
Really? It must be more of a Belfast phenomenon, because my experience just wouldn't correlate with that at all.
I have meet a number of, mainly younger, people who have described themselves as Northern Irish but they have been, almost without exception, from a Unionist/Protestant background.
I'm not so sure it's as one-way as you seem to suggest; as if the confusion is all their fault. There's a reason why unionists have hang-ups in self-identifying as Irish and I think it would be unfair to suggest it's all their doing.
The popular and widely-understood conception of Irishness - generally, the identity channelled through the state of Ireland - has historically been used as an ideological vehicle and became very much politicised over the past century, perhaps by virtue of its quasi-official adoption by the Irish state post-independence. Consequently, it now carries with it "baggage" with which modern-day unionists evidently don't feel completely comfortable, if at all. Upon the Free State attaining independence, the new projection of Ireland from within the new state was, according to commentators like Síghle Bhreathnach-Lynch, that of "a bleak but beautiful countryside, peopled exclusively by a sturdy, Gaelic-speaking, Catholic people". Such imagery exalted an identity that was "instantly recognisably different from that of its former ruler Britain, which was perceived as urban, English-speaking and Protestant". I'm not suggesting that that's how we all view Irishness nowadays - the modern Irish identity is obviously a lot more diverse and complex than that - but the notion still possesses contentious connotations for some, especially when it has such an historical and seemingly-inherent attachment to republican political ideology.
For many unionists/northern Protestants uninterested in identifying themselves as Irish, the word "Irish" is associated with republicanism, Catholicism, the Gaelic tradition, non-Britishness, separatism or whatever one wants to call it. This most likely stemmed from a combination of the efforts of the independent state to assert a sort of post-colonial identity for itself along with unionists' inevitable hostility towards such a budding identity; one that was completely polar to or at odds with their interests and political aspirations.
NB self-identifies as Irish but it doesn't appear to be the same sense of Irishness with which yourself and myself identify, for example. For some unionists, if they were to identify themselves as such, they may well fear they'd be misinterpreted as identifying with the Irish identity channelled through the Irish state; the one historically associated with republicanism. Perhaps NB views the Irish identity associated with the Irish state as a splinter Irish identity?
Interestingly, in 1905, the Irish Unionist Party proudly displayed a slogan in Gaelic at their party convention. Since 1892 actually, they were using the slogan 'Erin go Bragh' to demonstrate their commitment to maintaining Ireland's position as a part of the UK. Obviously, the slogan possesses contrasting connotations nowadays. As does, sadly, the Gaelic language (now referred to as "the Irish language" upon official instruction of the Irish state, of course).
Nevertheless, unionists of the modern day like Linda Ervine, Chris McGimpsey and Basil McCrea have been willing to acknowledge (and act on to their own personal cultural enrichment) that aspect of the language's history, which is positive, as are schemes/developments such as these: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-19715146 and http://sluggerotoole.com/2012/10/13/...peech-pupconf/
In fact, there was an Orange Lodge in Belfast during the 1970s named Oidhreacht Éireann (Ireland's Heritage) LOL 1303. So then, whilst broadly viewed, whether correctly or not, as preserves of the Irish republican tradition, I suppose nobody on the island can lay exclusive claim to the labels "Irish" or "Gaelic".
Not neccessarily in my experience - I worked for a Nationalist employer in South Down in recent years (in fact, I think I was the only Unionist on the payroll!)...he primarily identifies as Northern Irish.
I currently work for a Nationalist employer in Belfast - she would identify primarily as Northern Irish too.
I am also a friend of an office bearer in my local SDLP Branch (he happens to be a Protestant) who also primarily indentifies as Northern Irish.
Semi-related to my above post, I was doing a bit of research on Irish art in a political context for a dissertation I've been working on of late and, in line with Bhreathnach-Lynch's aforementioned insight, found the following acute observation by Aidan Dunne fascinating:
http://www.duffyrafferty.com/wp-cont.../logo-nitb.jpgQuote:
If the Nationalist myth of the West of Ireland indicates a distrust of towns as a colonial imposition, the Loyalist identification with organized, defensible territory is apparent in a distrust of the amorphous, threatening wilderness. It is interesting in this context that the favored icons of natural landscape used to promote tourism in Northern Ireland are the orderly hexagonal basalt columns of the Giant's Causeway [see the logo of the NITB below, for example], a structure that echoes man-made architectonic forms, whereas in the South the vague, unbounded expanses of the Atlantic seaboard have traditionally been the dominant representative landscape.
No DI - I view it as a different association of Irish identity to mine.
My Irish identity has nothing to do with the Republic of Ireland State, styling itself "Ireland".
On the use of Gaelic you highlighted, apart from Orange Lodges etc, I would highlight the motto of the Royal Irish Regiment also - "Faugh A Ballagh".
Agreed on both points.
Whilst accepting anecdotal evidence, this is borne out by the political distribution of parliamentary and other seats.
As in mainly nationalist, 'west' of the Bann.
Plus met numerous people from certain parts of Beal-feirste who would never think of themselves as 'northern' Irish.
And quite right too...
Incidentally, not met anyone who lives/has lived in the other 26 counties who'd call themselves 'British', but English, Scottish, Welsh. Or from 'the north'...
:rolleyes:
And you likewise.
;)
It's up to them, how they identify. I just happen to agree with them...
Rumour has it the French Football Federation are looking into Joey Barton's eligibility after he impressed in his first Ligue 1 television performance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3U-r8T31Ns
Interesting survey in the Irish Times today.
How apt...
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...327144275.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by STEPHEN COLLINS in The Irish Times