Does your attention ever wander from the Clark and Trapattoni related threads?
Printable View
Clark did have a poor game, or rather he oscillated between quality and amateur defending. He was the best of a bad bunch though - Baker was absolutely atrocious, particularly for the second goal.
Watched whole match and I didnt see this quality defending you mention.
He oscillated between bad and terrible..
FFS they were playing against a 3rd division team and he looked poor.
We are all looking for quality players that can play for Ireland but Clark will be not one of them.
Clark had a stinker alright, but in fairness, he wasn't helped by playing with three other stooges.
On a serious note, this can't be good for Clarks confidence playing in a team thats poor in terms of quality and experience.
To be fair Clark needs a few experienced players around him to tell him when to go and when to stay in addition to cover for him when he goes missing through lack of experience.
He could do with taking a rest out if the side but not much chance of that with Villas lack of players available.
The worry now is that he may not recover from this experience, he's not a bad player, nowhere near the finished article and nowhere near as good as many on here make him out to be.
That's not his fault though, all players have bad games or a run of bad results, how they come back from them is the difference.
I hope he can rise above all this and get back to learning his trade without all the hype.
Many people make the mistake of thinking that every player in the Premiership are something special, some are but most aren't.
Vastly over rated league not helped by Sky constantly brainwashing everyone everyday telling us how good it is.
Who cares about that anyhow my main concern is our national team and our players so feck em!
The only positive of of a big negative is that Dunne could get a new contract as he is the obvious player to stabilise a very shaky defence. Clark was captain against Bradford and his confidence is too shaken for him to offer real leadership. Villa would also benefit from buying a tough, physical, experienced holding midfielder who could boss what was a very ineffectual midfield.
Then it's a ball-playing midfielder, not a holding midfielder, they need.
Clark can play midfield...
how about a ball-holding playing-midfielder?
err, on second thoughts, maybe not
They need both, and 7 other new players in fairness. Clark can stay.
Is Clark predominantly left-footed? I thought he was and I notice he has been on the right side of the two centre halves. Now whatever about the old " 30k-a-week-should-be-able-to-kick-with-both-feet" argument, I always like to see a right sided centre back and a left sided centre back play on their stronger foot.
Focusing on the positives
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21025949
Like this? We missed out iirc... :)
http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/wp-co...1/12/Gazza.jpg
The more I see him the more I have to agree with Doc unfortunately.
Positioning poor again tonight, no a leader (yet), very rash tackler...not the long term solution
I was impressed Clark was passing the ball tonight instead of aimlessly lumping it like the first leg, but once Bradford scored, all leadership was lost and he ended up pumping in endless diagonal balls to Bent and Benteke. Clark is a good, good player but he needs experienced players around him to talk to him because he's not making good decisions. Vlaar isn't that, and they badly need Dunne back.
Ironically, I think Clark would fare very well alongside a leader like the doc, if only he'd give him a chance.
I think Villa fans who watch him regularly should know more than we do about him.
http://www.heroesandvillains.info/fo....60#msg2240595
Just reading the latest page of that thread (page 5) and the criticism is pretty damning.
I'm sure you could find many threads from earlier in the season where they talk about how good he is. Club forums are generally quite fickle. When his form picks up the same people will be saying they never doubted him for a second.
Irrespective of his current or past form, a couple of fools here need to drop their needless agenda as it relates to him. Quite pathetic. Worse than the british tabloids...
Nobody was making that out. That is a figment of your imagination. Thereby, foolish, some would say.
Oh well enough of all this!
We have important qualifying games to win against Sweden and Austria, so lets get behind the boys in green.
I will be there giving it 100%
Will you?
Club forums aren't worth an absolute damn, imo, unless you find a poster who talks sense (very difficult when most of them have a gigantic amount of posters). The English team I support....for every ten people who'll say one thing, another ten will disagree with them. And this about pretty much EVERYTHING. They're madhouses. I look in on the Hibs one usually also. One week Paddy Fenlon is the greatest manager in Scotland and needs to be protected from being poached by an English club, the next his lot can't beat Ross County and he's out of his depth and not the man for the job.
He wont be there, but he will be giving it 110% Doc, thats what he is saying.
My life has reached an all time low... Paul O'Shea clarifies one of my posts... ;)
Yup. Trustworthy opinion. A bunch of flip flopping keyboard warriors most of whom watch MOTD or a thumbnail size choppy screen and would write Paul McGrath off after a poor game.
Clark can play, even if he is inexperienced, raw and tottering on the deck of a sinking ship. Whether he's finished ala James McClean remains to be seen.