Originally Posted by
dcfcsteve
At least someone i giving the Shels v Derry game some credit anyway.
Comparisons to England make perfect sense in showing how daft it is to consider Rovers v Bohs a bigger game than the top of the table clash. If you'd rather I used a smaller country, it would've been like saying St Mirren versus someone like Aberdeen was a bigger game for TV than Celtic v Hearts. The size of country I use in these examples is irrelevant - they are just to give it some perspective to show how TG4's choice is strange.
Usually, choices in deciding which game to televise live are made on the basis of general interest. Not just interest amongst the very small EL fan market/Dublin taxi drivers - but wider interest. As the quality of football will be better between Shels and City, you could reasonably argue it is likely to attract and more importantly retain a larger audience than Rovers v Bohs (though I could be wrong, as this is moot). Regardless - the choise is not made because of some expectation with regards the attendance. You've admitted that the football will be better at the Shels City game, and the crowd better at the other, though the crowd will be neither spectacular nor even noteworthy at either match, so can't be considered a significant factor in the decision. The football is what the cameras look at for 90mins - not the crowd. So why should a channel choose to neglect showing the better game in favour of one with an insignificantly (in outright terms) bigger attendance ?? This is what I find strange.