:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
The FAI will be involved in running the league and may be a chance for them to make a bit of extra cash by taking in club's gate receipts!
Printable View
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
The FAI will be involved in running the league and may be a chance for them to make a bit of extra cash by taking in club's gate receipts!
Dublin City voted against it according to the Sun this morning and they've been quoted as saying that they respect the decision of their fellow league clubs but will take it to court if they get relegated.
I'm sure he said they wouldn't go to court but may look for compo :confused:
The headline says they won't go to court, but it doesn't say that in the text of the article. It did say he'd be looking for compensation.Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesThompson
Kildare and Cobh were the ones who didn't attend, one of the papers said. I can only assume we were the ones who abstained.
Raheny Red - season tickets are never allowed for FAI Cup games as the entire gate receipts are to be split between the FAI, the home club and the away club. So there'll be no change. And it's the least of our worries. UEFA Licencing and the FAI's general competency taking another blow yesterday with the Cork news is way more important.
Im delighted about the vote but my only bone of contention is the name "the priemership". We should have picked a unique name.
In three years time we can expect the likes of Shels et al to be knocking on the door for the group stages.
Care to outline how that will come about so fast, Jolly?Quote:
Originally Posted by thejollyrodger
bit over da top. even though i'm happy the vote was passed it's more in hope that the fai might make it work rather than in expectation and it will take a lot more than 3 years. i'm thinkin 6-8 years down the lineQuote:
Originally Posted by thejollyrodger
I see it all now, John Delaney is actually one of the underpants gnomes from South Park.Quote:
Originally Posted by thejollyrodger
The FAI Underpants Gnomes have a three-phase business plan, consisting of:
Phase 1: eL vote for FAI merger
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit! ("Shels et al to be knocking on the door for the group stages")
Makes sense to me.
Apparently the mighty Quinn has just got his takeover of Sunderland sorted out.
Sporting Life have the details here
Seriously, I'm not having a go at Quinn - good luck to him, he seems a nice fella who loves his football. But I see no reason why is on a panel advising on the future of the domestic game. He has no track record of showing an interest in the league, he's never played in it and I've never heard him associated with it before the recent appointment. Looks like a hobby he won't have time for with the Sunderland thing now taking up his time.
What gives?
I know Dodge picked up on this earlier, but why do they persist on calling it a new 4 tier league in press releases? It's more like a 2 and a half tier league.
I have to say, I'm impressed with how Delaney has managed to talk this up and convince so many people, including fellow foot.ie posters, that this will magically bring success and fortune to the league without offering a single concrete reason as to how it will radically alter anything.
I'm impressed that the majority of clubs have the foresight to see we cant continue as is. Certain people will always be afraid of change.Quote:
Originally Posted by Poor Student
KOH
But if you're proposing a change you need to do two things. Show that a change is needed and show how this particular change will be an improvement.Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Hoop
The first point is clear, the league is being run very badly. The second point is not at all clear. There is little if any rational given for the switch back to a ten team premier or switching the U21 league to winter football or pretty much any other part of this proposal.
The only arguments in favour of this change are like the one you gave above. 'Stop being afraid of change' or 'Stop trying to hold back the league'.
You make it sound like the emperors new clothes !! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Poor Student
The doubling of prize money. What clubs will say no to that? 10 team is better than the failed 12 team league. It's gonna happen. Accept it and there will be no court cases. It's not a crusade to exclude UCD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Student Mullet
KOH
Prize money to some teams. Teams who finish lower than 6th will get nothing. And in fairness there are more than just UCD fans against this and still nobody has answered his original point on how this will make the league betterQuote:
Originally Posted by NY Hoop
The prize money is only to the benefit of four clubs, most of the league will be worse off under that proposal though it will help the teams in europe and the newly promoted team which is good.Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Hoop
The ten and twelve team premiers have both been tried and neither is a magic solution to the leagues problems. The fact that neither the Genesis Report nor the FAI's documents on the new league even make reference to the fact that we had a ten team Premier only a few years ago worries me. They're only taking into account the facts that support their argument, it's not a well tought out proposal. Instead of saying that we're going back to the ten team league and giving the reasons why it was better it's being presented as part of an innovative new package.
I don't have a strong preference for either but the constant changing does annoy me. The fact that one of the first things the FAI plan to do when they take over the league is switch again does not make me confidant that they have any new ideas for running the thing.
I think that this is the type of thing Poor Student was complaining about when he said that there's no concrete reasons to think that these changes will lead to an improvement. Saying that 'it's going to happen' is not an argument in favour of the proposals.Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Hoop
Maybe to you it's not but I've been on this crusade for almost 10 years, when I went to my first UCD game in Belfield! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by NY Hoop
[Off Topic]Was your first game a 2-1 win for Cork? I was at that game ten years ago and it was my first game in Belfield too.[/Off Topic]Quote:
Originally Posted by Peadar
We won but that's about as much as I remember because I'd been in the bar looking down onto the sports hall all day before the game. To be fair, it was the culchie UCD students in the bar, trying to put on posh accents and talk shíte, that pist me off more than the football but ever since I've been on my crusade to rid the league of your lot! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Student Mullet
Crusade finished. Student mullet is peadar!
KOH
Face, you're a genius. That's a good way of putting it.Quote:
Originally Posted by A face
NY Hoop, you're giving the reasons that any suit I've seen or talked to have given. "The league isn't working as it is now." So we should change for change sake? What do you see that can bring about wholesale and meaningful change? The prize money is a red herring. The "promotions officer" with the 10k grant is not enough. The formula to realign the league's clubs is nonsense.
Does that make you a Saracen then... ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Student Mullet
Football. The Saracen game...... :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poor Student
There is one thing that has not been discussed ever ..... and probably because the powers that be never thought it important before.
Media
I am dead serious here, the FAI/eL already have a vast resource available for them to exploit. News .... Info .... data.
The league is being left at the mercy of TV3 at midnight on Monday, and we all know that alot more could be made of it. The FAI should form their own media company and make their own package and sell it to the TV stations (even for the same cost of running eL weekly now) ... tie it in with Internationals aswell. I cant see anything wrong with the FAI saying that if you want X amount of internationals a year, then you must show X amount of schoolboy, junior, intermediate, senior, disabled football a year aswell.
Argue the fact that RTE show a foreign league at the cost of our own league. Sky are allowed broadcast here aswell.
If the FAI could control how the league/Irish football is perceived then they would be doing the league a huge favour. They really need to grow a pair of balls and take this on.
The money they make from it (if any) should then be shared equally between clubs. This 10K for each club should go to invest in the media company ... €220,000 + the staff that make their quarterly newsletter, and input from clubs is more than enough to sort it out. If they were to sort out the coverage then clubs can go to sponsors and offer them something tangiable, along with everything they have already.
With them slipping from 6th to 9th spot recently, with Bray 2 wins from catching them, and Longford also chasing them with the aid of 3 games in hand, Seery might not have to take anything to court at all. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesThompson
They tried this with The Soccer Show but the initial product wasn't great so, like everything else they do, they gave up and replaced it with...nothing?Quote:
Originally Posted by A face
I totally agree with your post though. It didn't really seem clear what they wanted to do with The Soccer Show (too many 'Nationwide'-type segments:rolleyes: ) and it came across too muddled. A proper highlights package, with commentary on one or two main games instead of TV3's tired format and, crucially, tied in with the internationals as you say. Sell it to Sky as well. The Champions League magazine programme would seem to be a good starting point. You can tell by the scheduling that TV companies don't really want to show it but they have to in order to get the live games. The FAI should use a similar tactic but ensure that it's shown at a reasonable time (not prime-time but not midnight on Monday night either!)
It's baffling (well not really considering the parties involved) that a comprehensive marketing plan is absent from all this. The 10k grant for a compulsory marketing officer is just another example of the cosmetic bullcrap that make up the rest of the proposals. I'm sure you've noticed that Sky have been running ads for their Premiership for a while now (possibly since England were knocked out or maybe earlier, I'm not sure) in the middle of the World Cup, 6 weeks before it starts. As I said before, it seems as if the FAI looked at the hugely-successful relaunch of the top English division 14 years ago and came to the conclusion that it was all down to THE NAME OF THE COMPETITION!:(
Just on the TV bit. You may remember that TV3 got the highlights package as part of the same deal that Sky got exclusive Live rights and TV3 got "exclusive" delayed rights. When Bertie changed the rules RTE ended up with live rights and TV3 was left with delayed coverage that nobody needed. I'm fairly sure that after that they couldn't give a toss. Another thing to note is that the current TV rights are not exclusive and any team can negotiate any deal for themselves (outside of RTE/tg4/Setanta's minimum) and there is nothing stopping any of the stations (including tv3) from showing either live games or a highlights package (so in this respect at least TV3 do something, howver poor it is). The bottom line is they don't want to. The SuperPrimeraBudesligaA righta can't really be linked to the international rights as long as they are protected by legislation and TV3's budget is so much less than RTEs.
To be honest, you'll search long and hard to find a Rovers fan against the proposals. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Poor Student
KOH
I hear Kilcoyne's going to be involved...Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreRovers
If at first you dont succeed, jump ship as fast as you can ...Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry The Saint
Exactly ... the FAI dont use ANY tactic .... i think thats where the problem is. Its amazing they cant see the value in it. It would be infinitely more valueable than that 10K to each club.Quote:
You can tell by the scheduling that TV companies don't really want to show it but they have to in order to get the live games. The FAI should use a similar tactic but ensure that it's shown at a reasonable time (not prime-time but not midnight on Monday night either!)
Get rid of Niall Quinn and use the money for a decent campaign.Quote:
It's baffling (well not really considering the parties involved) that a comprehensive marketing plan is absent from all this. The 10k grant for a compulsory marketing officer is just another example of the cosmetic bullcrap that make up the rest of the proposals. I'm sure you've noticed that Sky have been running ads for their Premiership for a while now (possibly since England were knocked out or maybe earlier, I'm not sure) in the middle of the World Cup, 6 weeks before it starts.
:pQuote:
As I said before, it seems as if the FAI looked at the hugely-successful relaunch of the top English division 14 years ago and came to the conclusion that it was all down to THE NAME OF THE COMPETITION!
I think they should contest it .... to be fair, the Minister for Sport at the time let in Sky Sports for floodlight, and basically condeming the domestic league to death and then they want to take away the FAI trump card .... fook that ... they cant have it every way .... if they want international rules, then give a decent package, it is the national broadcaster after all ...... they should at the very least ask for 150% of the hours they show foreign leagues .... its our NATIONAL LEAGUE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Again ... the FAI need to grow a pair of balls and start piping up and asking the questions. Lobby the fúckers, try to influence the decisions ffs
Yeah, as a consultant on the sale of Richmond..........Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
KOH
Yes it can - and if it was, more than likely Sky would offer to show it. This would either force RTE to match Sky, or the Government to let it go to Sky. There's a clause in the legislation that means that RTE/TV3 must pay a reasonable amount for the coverage, and no reason why that can't include eL highlights package at whatever time the FAI state. If the FAI can show another broadcaster meeting their requirements....Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Unfortunatley no appetite in the FAI for that battle.
Sorry, shouldn't have used can't. Obviously it could be linked, meant to say won't (for the reasoning in your last line)Quote:
Originally Posted by Macy
Face, I think that Bald Student attended the promotional launch of the new league or something like that, where in his capacity as NLSA representative he raised the issue of the name of the league, and if I recall correctly he said they said they hoped to do something about the highlights package.
Our profiteers are way way above Louis's grubby little headQuote:
Originally Posted by WeAreRovers
How true, if the greedy little tosspot had waited a year or two he could have retired to the Caymans. Your boys, on the other hand, didn't get to be Developer of the Year 2005 without knowing the price of property. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
KOH
Nah, wrong construction giants WaR. Close though...
When is this going to happen ??Quote:
Originally Posted by Poor Student
Are fans going to be asked about what they'd like to see feature in it ??
Or will it just go them same as the soccer show? There have been enough mistakes been made so there is a good chance they'll get it right this time yeah?
Not a clue, Face. I just found it the mildest bit encouraging that it suggests they at least ackowledge in some way that eL Weekly is not good enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by A face