Just wondering, even from an insight perspective, would it not have made sense to include O'Dowda?
Printable View
Just wondering, even from an insight perspective, would it not have made sense to include O'Dowda?
That would have sparked whooping and hollering a few years ago, that it's been quiet says a lot for his standing right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
It definitely lends weight to Razors theory about a limitation by the FAI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eirambler
Squad is the squad. The omissions more or less = the inclusions so there’s nothing worth getting too hung up on. I’d have liked Festy and Molumby both in there as add-ons. Delighted with Lawal being called up but want to see him deployed as a DM.
I’m whooping and hollering at this bit of Barry’s tea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
We've had too many false dawns to get excited until they are actually good in a green shirt. He might be a Finn Azaz, but could just as likely be a Tom Cannon... let's save the whooping for something worth whooping forQuote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
We're singing from the same hymn sheet here, and hands up, I've been (more often than not) the one doing the whooping plenty in the past.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
Fond of the tea-bagging are you, or is it loose leaf?Quote:
Originally Posted by SkStu
Is Molumby injured?
Nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by pateen
Barry's is Fine Gael tea lest any have forgotten or just don't know !Quote:
Originally Posted by SkStu
Barry's Tea is the bestest tea on this fine island. That a Kerryman can accept that means you should all accept it.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanfhear
I must admit that I have drunk that Blue-Shirt tea and it is good tea but it is still Blue-Shirt tea !Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
If you were to nitpick the squad Id have Molumby over Philips, but its a fairly marginal call and not one that I think anyone would be too upset about.... apart from Molumby himselfQuote:
Originally Posted by pateen
Wasn't Phillips dire in Luxembourg? Like, even by comparison with the rest? I'm surprised he's kept his place tbh. Molumby has flattered to deceive often, but I think he can feel hard done by.
But it's not going to be transformational to the squad for sure
I think Molumby is the fall guy for the mental capitulation in Wembley with our complete inability to manage the game. Heimer was horrified after that match and can't look at him the same. It's hard to blame him.
Shocking. I’m appalled .Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
Thompsons finest, the lovely Punjana is the only allowable tea for everyday cuppas.
Spot of earl grey in the evening.
Yeah I wouldnt be a fan of Philips at all. Great attitude and will run all day, but Molumby is a better footballer. We really need someone coming through thereQuote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
I will wait a while before I judge Phillips but my instinct is that you are rightQuote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
Squad selection aside, I'll be interested in how HH approaches this one. He's making the right noises, but he's kind of conceded that he'll take the draw at home (not unwise, fair is fair).
Kerkez, as much as I like him, looks like someone who can be targeted defensively and it is absolutely clear he's a liability in the air. In that respect, for any set-pieces, I would overload the front, go long and attack him with someone unusually capable in the air - Matt Doherty, Jack Taylor, or COD (had he been selected). Let Ferguson Collins and O'Shea draw their big lads away and isolate Kerkez.
Secondly, Szobosolai. I'd man mark him, I'd sit Jason Knight on him all game - well technically I would sit Molumby on him all game, but in lieu of him not being in the squad, I'd give it to Knight. He's a fine player and he could really kill us in an area where we've shown scant willingness to learn this decade.
In his press conference he mentioned Hungary's ability from long shots and what will be our need to make sure the space around the edge of the box is closed down quickly. It was a welcome change from his predecessor, who completely ignored the issue and seemed to refuse to make a plan to deal with it.
I haven't seen that weakness in Kerkez, but fair play to you for a good observation. You mentioned the aerial game - that is exactly where we will find success against Hungary. Collins, O'Shea, Doherty, Ferguson and maybe even Scales or O'Brien at some point during the game. That is a serious amount of weaponry for corners and free kicks. Or from crosses from Ogbene and Johnson. All that said I sure as heck don't like to hear that HH would settle for a draw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
Tony Gordon - who to be extremely fair to him this season has shown a good determination to win duels in the air - beat him badly on Monday night and was a left off before Guimares (I think?) made him look absolutely clueless at defending anything aerial for the first Toon goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by mark12345
Against Bournemouth, twice I'm nearly 100% sure the ball came across the box and he was almost crouched down (not a good look for a little 'un) looking skyward as the ball crossed his patch.
Could it be a blip? For sure. Could it be something to consider, examine and exploit further? Of course. Is it something Mark Travers might have noticed and could be consulted about even if not in the squad? Absolutely.
Of course, there's no guarantee that he'll play lb for them - when they played in Dublin last year, their formation was unorthodox, and I wouldn't be surprised if he has a more attack-minded role for them (they'll surely look to win in Dublin ahead of hosting Portugal)?
The story today from John Fallon about redundancies in the FAI probably backs up this theoryQuote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
RTE Sport online are claiming it is a UEFA requirement to only have a 23 man squad. Seems unusual.
https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2025...-gets-serious/
"UEFA stipulations limit the manager to calling up a maximum of 23 players for the international window, and Hallgrimsson admitted that it was a tough task attempting to get the balance right with the final selection.
A welcome headache, no doubt, as Hallgrimsson’s 12-month tenure has resulted in a settled squad with real competition for places, and with so many established players omitted, including captain Seamus Coleman, it places an added onus on those involved to hold onto their jersey.
Hallgrimsson also offered some insight into his selection process, with a real emphasis on versatility and on those who can bring something different to the squad."
If thats true maybe its to try keep a level playing field for all countries?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
Those first 3 words are very important.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
The wording "a maximum of" on RTE suggests that no replacements are permitted. In a post-pandemic world...that seems very unusual.
But Hungary have 27 in their squad...
"This time, Marco Rossi announced a larger than usual squad of 27 men for the World Cup qualifying matches in September, so that the national team would be prepared for all eventualities in the first two matches of the World Cup qualification."
You can only name 23 players in the matchday squad afaik. But that's different.
Ok so we are back to FAI being cheap and broke :D
Had we left that scenario for a bit?Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
Yeah, it's 23 on match days alright. But you can name as many in your overall squad as you want.
Lets be fair though, Hungary don't generally give two sheets about anything direction coming from Europe, whether that's Nyon, Brussels or Strasbourg.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
I don't think they necessarily get a choice tbh
Serbia have 29 in their squad for the window though. The North have 26. Germany - sticklers for rules of course - only have 23. But there's enough there to say it's not a rule that you can only call up a max of 23
Hungarian squad was also named on Tuesday
https://valogatott.mlsz.hu/ferfi-a-v...leni-kereteben
Going by wikipedia, their main threats are Szoboszlai(16 goals) and Sallai(14)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungar...l_team#Players
Armenia squad also announced
https://www.ffa.am/en/news/eghishe-m...listneri-canky
Would seem to have a similar international record to our own
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armeni...l_team#Players
Parrott ruled out of the two games it seems. Cannon, Armstrong or Barry to come in?
Ah ******. That's a massive blow.
******** ******** ********.
At least 88 doesn't have to worry about making any tough decisions now.
Id bring in Barry. We have enough cover as striker with Ferguson, Idah and even Szmodics. Barry can give us more options wideQuote:
Originally Posted by Eirambler
Desperate timing for us given Parrott’s form. I’d be inclined to try Barry out. Ferguson has had a really good start but he doesn’t have much more than 70 minutes in him just yet, I wouldn’t like to be relying on Idah at the moment to do much for us. Is the alternative to call up another midfielder? Maybe Molumby to be brought on if we need to defend a lead (it’s the hope that kills you).
Its really not ideal having Parrott missing given his form, but I think it might actually give us a better team balance. Hallgrimsson played with both Parrott and Ferguson in the last games as far as I remember it, with Ferguson dropping deep into the 10 role. If Azaz goes into the 10 and Ferguson plays up front that will be better than trying to just shoehorn both Ferguson and Parrott in.
Im not saying that it good that Parrott is out obviously, but right now it looks like we only have room for one striker in the actually team so its one decision that is already made for the starting 11
Cannon has been woefulQuote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg