1-0 down at home within 2 minutes. Long should have equalised but shot straight at the keeper.
Printable View
1-0 down at home within 2 minutes. Long should have equalised but shot straight at the keeper.
1-1, Brady lays it on a plate for Elmo.
Elmo is a rat!Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin
Half time. Long has missed four great chances and gotten booked, according to journalists.
Only four?
Yeah, not up to his usual standard of missing.
A late Sakho header puts Hull through to the play-off round 2-1 on aggregate.
Neither Brady nor Long comes out well in this match report.
http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football...in_169937.html
Yeah. Thank God we have jazz hands to come back and drag defenders all over the place, win headers, link the play up, get on the end of Wes and Andy's passes, win fouls in/around the box and create those kind of chances for himself eh?
Oh get over yourself. Long's finishing is a major weakness despite his good work. Keane's finishing is a major strength despite his lesser influence in general play.
Don't tell me you're happy to read that Long scuffed chances and shot straight at the keeper several times, as he is wont to do.
I have to admit I didn't see whether he created those chances for himself - did he? - but I'd be seriously worried if his yips in front of goal (that's what they are becoming - yips) continue into the start of the league season.
Edit: I should also add that it's a particular worry because Bruce isn't stupid and he has more options than last season. Long is at serious risk of being benched, which ieould be a serious disadvantage for Ireland. I think that's fair to say.
What an odious bell-end of a comment. Do you genuinely want us to fail so you can compose a trite "I Told You So" post?Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
This forum could do with an ignore button.
As opposed to the people that seem to be taking glee in Shane Long missing chances in a game they didn't even watch?
Of course I don't want Ireland to fail ffs.
C'mon, what is your gripe with Robbie, really? You clearly hold something against him for some reason...Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
Was this you?: http://thescore.thejournal.ie/profil...teams-1739147/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
Today's your lucky day, Diarmo!: http://foot.ie/profile.php?do=ignorelistQuote:
Originally Posted by Diarmo
Who's been taking joy from Shane Long missing chances? Nobody enjoys it when he misses chances. I interpret the comments of Stutts and Charlie above as being primarily borne out of an all-too-familiar frustration.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
Taking glee? Seriously?
Some context is required here. A very outspoken poster here takes every opportunity possible, with the occasional concession to rational argument, to argue against the merits of a pretty reliable international goalscorer. Jazz hands, age, inferior league, no goals against Brazil or Germany, whatever excuse possible. At the same time he overlooks the very real fact that our most athletic forward also has a very serious deficit in front of goal.
I've a balanced view here. For the umpteenth time I see a lot of quality in Long but his finishing has been awful, and not just recently. I'd pick him over Keane all day long if I didn't feel he was becoming utterly hapless in front of goal. If not hapless then the most charitable I can concede is unreliable. That'd be generous as things stand. I hope be makes me look stupid but in the last few years I have seen too many bad misses not to think he just hasn't got instinctive goal scoring in his locker.
But I don't recall any concession from the other party that Long's finishing isn't a worry.
Long brings something to the table that Keane doesn't. Keane brings something to the table that Long doesn't. It's not something that's easily solved. It'd be nice to think we could afford just one player in the final third not busting his ****** just to occupy defenders and that our midfielders and wide players can get sufficient grip on a game to feel confident enough to pick a reliable goalscorer.
And don't patronise me about a game I didn't even watch. Hull is over 100 miles from where I live and it wasn't on telly. A live match report is the best evidence I had and it was pretty scathing in its description of Long's finishing. If it didn't match my own observations over the last two or three seasons I wouldn't have been as inclined to accept it as true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyInvincible
I've always thought of TOWK as something that is usually wrapped in latex.Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
Seems like Rory McIlroy owes his recent majors wins to McShane and Robbie Brady
https://mobile.twitter.com/pmacca15/...04919546822656
Not a one Irishman in the Hull starting line-up to face QPR, Ince getting the nod ahead of Brady. Dunne starts for QPR alongside Ferdinand and Caulker.
McShane, Brady and Meyler all in for the Europa League game in Belgium, Quinn not in the squad. Shame that Hull seem to be treating European competition as a reserve competition.
Quinn failed a fitness test before kick off
Brady was substituted after an hour for Tom Ince, McShane was the first to get booked and Meyler has had a "sweetly struck" shot tipped over the bar as they pepper the Lokeren goal in search of an equaliser.
Looks like Alex Bruce is leaving Hull as part of the Jordan Rhodes deal (funnily enough, to join the club that released him 10 years ago), which is good news for McShane, who played well in Belgium yesterday by all accounts.
I think McShane could score a hat trick against Argentina and keep Messi in his pocket and some people would say he's kack still. I think he's a good half season (or less) away from being very close to our first XI. Wilson has so far failed to make the second CB spot fully his own and solving the left back problem might involve some musical chairs.
McShane and Quinn start for Hull at home to Stoke today. Meyler is on the bench and Brady nowhere to be found. They were down to 10 men early on as James Chester was sent off for a last-man tackle on Glenn Whelan, who started alongside Wilson with Walters on the bench and Ireland not in the squad.
I think Quinn has been really good. A proper busy midfielder. A definite option for the September games, especially if McClean isn't around. We don't need a winger out wide, a left sided midfielder would work well there too. He also an option for the middle, but somewhere I feel O'Neill will need to pick Hoolahan and/or Reid. McCarthy is a gimme.
McShane has done the defensive work really well. I think he started left back but went central when Chester was sent off. He looks like he's relishing the responsibility.
Marc Wilson did a Phil Babb on the goalposts attempting to block the Jelavic goal. I hope he already has children. Check it out if you didn't see it. Ouch!
McShane started on the left of a back three with Chester and Davies, but they've reverted to four at the back with the wing backs playing as full backs.
Commentators full of praise for both Quinn and McShane, and rightly so, with O'Neill and Keane looking on. Quinn replaced on 75 minutes by Meyler.
Stoke equalise with one of the luckiest goal you'll ever see. Hull give the ball away again in midfield with an awful pass to nobody, Stoke then win a throw-in that should have gone Hull's way, and from the resulting cross they stab the ball in at the fourth attempt after McGregor had saved.
Was Monkeano in the crowd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin
He/they/it was indeed.
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/match/hull...703523/ratings
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php...-123-Stoke-(H)
Stephen Quinn and Paul McShane impress for Hull.
I thought poor McShane had a slight involvement for the sending off. He played a dodgy ball to put Livermore under pressure who played a dodgy ball that put Chester under more pressure which resulted in him felling Whelan.
Overall, he contended well with Stoke whilst they were down a man. Quinn beside McCarthy in the middle of the park?
In the links TOWK posted, a lot of people are taking marks off McShane for the pass that eventually led to the goal, but although slightly hurried it was a perfectly good pass that Livermore should have been able to deal with easily. If it was Manchester City or Liverpool and the same thing happened, I don't think people would be blaming Skrtel for Henderson's inability to control a simple pass.
He has definitely put himself up the order. I'd be more inclined to pick him as a wide left midfielder rather than as part of a central two, unless Hoolahan plays slightly further up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
I think Hendrick has staked a good claim too, but I still think Whelan and McCarthy will be picked.
Quinn to start against Georgia?
Brady, McClean and Pilkington are all desperately short of match practice/form. Who are the alternatives? Walters?
Whelan was starting in the past when his club formed didn't really merit it. In fairness to him, his club form has improved under Hughes and he merits the start more than he has done.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuttgart88
I just feel that Quinn gives something different though. We've always had the issue with retaining possession and that was one of the reasons Hoolahan has been brought into the starting 11. Still though, that's in the final third. I think having Quinn beside McCarthy would bring the best out in him. McCarthy is a very energetic operator. Having someone beside him who can provide him with frequent and quality ball in the middle third might bring the most out of his industry. Whelan's a ball player in his own right too, but, unfortunately, he appears to sometimes interpret being asked to sit beside McCarthy all too literally.
Fair enough having a sitting option against bigger sides. We've struggled to put away the likes of Georgia properly in recent campaigns. Often because we haven't, to use a cliché, taken the games by the scruff of the neck and brought it to them.
Quinn on the left is a decent option. Is he quick enough to play there at international level though? McGeady appers nailed on for one flank. Is it between Quinn and Reid for the left or will the management opt for a pacy winger who will be more fluid in moving between 4-5-1 and 4-3-3 and defence and attack given that McGeady can let his defensive duties slide sometimes? Brady, McClean and Walters probably offer that more than Quinn and Reid. But none of the three started this weekend for their clubs.
Yep, I think in the past our midfield has been very passive and Quinn would bring a bit of bite and "snapping at ankles" into it. I thought Green and McCarthy did really well in Stockholm, and Quinn is a better player than Green. Quinn is pretty effective at finding space between the lines. He wouldn't have Hoolahan or Reid's vision or precision but he gets about and looks to be involved all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
Agreed. I think he'd offer that bit more energy against Georgia when we don't need to shield our defence from over-ingenious attackers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuttgart88
And I'm saying this as someone who does like Whelan.
Hull 2-0 down, McShane and Quinn playing Brady and Meyler on the bench.
Villa keeper clattered, Given warming up, but he has not come on.
Half Time, all Villa really,
Brady on, Grealish coming on too perhaps.
Goal!! Brady free kick, double headers and into the net.
Grealish on