I once saw Marty in Dicey's surrounded by wimmin. He's a scarier looking man in real life.
Printable View
I once saw Marty in Dicey's surrounded by wimmin. He's a scarier looking man in real life.
Wrong wrong wrong spud I did listen to the piece with DES and rent a mouth and I assume the fai problem was not with the piece about Delaney wages but about the accounts that had been presented at the gam
The jist of which was that the accounts were incomplete or was hiding something and I've never heard DES question the honesty or integrity of any other codes
Delaney has paid back his salary a dozen times over in terms of improved revenue since he took over. He's an unlikable ass and no right thinking person wants to see him bring home mega money but he's exactly the type of slippery eel we need at the head of the FAI. I haven't heard much about accusations of accounting irregularities - that would be a whole other story if substantiated.
Sorry but as far as I'm concerned he's only interested in lining his own pockets. He's more interested in Man U than Irish football.
Of course he's only interested in lining his own pockets. All that matters is that he lines the FAI's pockets significantly more.
Second part of the interview was about the agm and the accounts that were presented , comments like were they audited and is that the complete picture we are getting as if they were incomplete anyway that's what it sounded like to me,
<facepalm>Quote:
Originally Posted by drummerboy
passerby, I heard it too, though there was no reason for the FAI to react as they did, your boss was getting carried away (as he did on a Saturday newstalk show a couple of weeks before) though nothing too close to the bone was done, JD and his buddies are reacting before serious questions are asked. They figured everyone would just roll over and play dead when they blamed Limerick's court case for the reduction in prizemoney, likewise the litany of mistruths and half truths regarding ticket sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by passerrby
And your have to take off the blinkers, Des led he way when he questioned (wrongly in my opinion) quite virulently about apparent cronyism in the IABA - when in fact the right men were moving into the right positions but instead of coming out swinging, they let it settle in the wrong hands.
Likewise he has been constantly critical of the GAA for not embracing more modern technology and doesn't hold back when it comes to criticising other associations. However if you only wish to hear what you want to, then nobody will change your mind. But please don't present it as fact.
Firstly spud John delancy has never been my boss in fact if you check my posts over they years you will find I've been a critic of a lot of fai policy but what I don't do is wear blinkers everytime John Delaney is mentioned on this forum.
I believe in my opinion that some reporters feel that soccer needs to be constantly dissected to find the seedy underbelly in a way that no other sport is treated
In fairness that, kind of accuracy, sounds exactly like an fai statementQuote:
Originally Posted by passerrby
Whatever about the rights or wrongs about Delaney banning Des Cahill, I'd have to agree with the above statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by passerrby
Where do you get something about JD being your boss? I don't understand that, and your blinkered attitude and statement that you've never heard Des Cahill pass comment or question other codes is blatantly misleading - if it's the case then you seem to have missed large chunks of Irish sporting life and never heard him discuss (quite regularly) with Pat Kenny the mismanagement or some other such problem with GAA, horse racing, boxing or even in the not too distant past, tennis. It does appear very blinkered if you only hear negative things about football in Ireland, it would appear you are actively seeking out the negative at teh cost of the positive. No?Quote:
Originally Posted by passerrby
Maybe we who follow the LOI and football in Ireland take such umbrage at questions being asked because questions need to be asked. In other codes (especially rugby) when they are attacked they try to get things right in house and build from the base up. Unlike the FAI who have actively squandered chance after chance to make football the number 2 sport in the country and have done their utmost to kill off the LOI.Quote:
Originally Posted by sullanefc
Where do you think such feelings arose in the first place? If there's no seedy underbelly to be exposed, what's to fear?Quote:
Originally Posted by passerrby
If Shamrock are the model club in this country, then Rugby is the model sport in this country. Rarely is there criticism of Rugby in the press in comparison to the constant criticism of football. The only criticism of Rugby I can remember is the ticketing prices of the Autumn internationals last year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudulika
2 words - Look harder! Read more than the football pages in newspapers. The IRFU were hammered for ticket overpricing, so they altered prices.Quote:
Originally Posted by sullanefc
If the FAI were not such a short term thinking bunch of crooks then maybe, just maybe there would be no need for investigation.
What does that matter anyway? Who cares about rugby? If there are problems that need addressed in the FAI, then it's best they're addressed, irrespective of whether there are problems in the completely irrelevant IRFU or whether the FAI gets a raw deal in the media in comparison.Quote:
Originally Posted by sullanefc
Somebody from RTE giving out about excessive salaries!!!!NO surely not! Des is sickened only because he doesn't get the Summer off like alot of his work buddies!
Think the problem for most on here is not that the FAI banned Des but why. Given the bad/negitive coverage of LOI that happens, especially in the written media, yet never a murmur from the FAI but bring up JD's salary..........
I'm not wumming, but are you saying there's something odd about his salary or that some folks in the FAI are setting him up to fail? - for the record, I think he is overpaid, though he works hard. Something more along the lines of 250,000 would be more appropriate, his current level looks like gouging. For some byzantine goings on in the FAI, I couldn't see it.
any discussion of jd wages is fair game and most think it is excesive in the extreme but i think the problem was more to do with the commnets about the accounts and there openess or otherwise
Spud, I think there is a general perception that his salary is ridiculously OTT and much more Celtic Tiger than current envoirnment. Given the state of many LOI clubs and the massive deficit facing the FAI it is even more difficult to justify the reported 400 K (although I understand he has taken a cut).Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudulika
No doubt he is not the most popular and there is always backstabbing in the FAI (sport they are best at :() but not aware of any current plot(s)
Thanks MB, I wasn't stirring, just wondering if the difficulties with the man were just because of his salary.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinobohs
The backstabbing element is everywhere, though the FAI seem to enjoy airing their dirty linen in public and when asked to account for something act so indignant that you think there's more going on than there is. Of all the major sporting organisations in the world of course football ones will get the most attention and criticism - they put themselves out there as the worlds game, so to sell papers and ad's the media will always go after them.
...... tends to be the ridiculous committee system masquerading as "democracy" inherent in football organisations. Be it FIFA allowing tiny countries equal votes to the mad FAI committee system (at one stage over 50 members :confused:). The "something for everyone in the audience" approach has become more important than any strategic business direction - usually to the detriment of the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudulika
http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...s-2854764.html
Roddy's been fined (or banned) as part of the same dispute that Des Cahill is in. A bit suspicious too that the FAI aren't releasing sanctions publicly. If they carry on like this then most of the posters on this website will be banned from matches too!
Moot now because the FAI are taking their ball home and are not coming out again until Roddy and Des apologise and agree to do their homework for them for two whole weeks.Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicMon
Weird, last week Des was part of a 3 way (discussion, not the good kind) absolutely slating the IABA - and not for the first time. Now while I didn't have a great deal of time for the IABA in the past, even with an ex-UCD boy at its head, under Dom O'Rourke they've been brilliant and one of the most progressive sports outfits in the country, bar the GAA. Yet Des, rightly, joined in actively in slamming their recent back and forth, yet the IABA were sure of their actions and there were no bans, no objections and just business as usual from a mature and self-confident association. I'd, previously, looked at JD as the puppeteer, though with this latest banning (belated as some would like) it does seem like there are more doing the pulling than just one man.
Were they not taken to court by that young lad from Portlaoise?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudulika
Different case - the case they discussed, and that I was referring to, was in relation to the senior box offs. The young lad who was thrown off the team for breaking camp - who took his car to a garage because he'd let an under age team mate drive his car in the hotel car park and crash it - is a different issue and wasn't discussed. However in this case the IABA fought their corner and then resolved it. It was the same over appointments etc. Mick Dowling has been sniping at the heads of the IABA (mainly jealousy as he's been overlooked time and again for a head coaching position - despite his achievements) and uses RTE to make points, yet he is treated as just one more unruly member of the clan. Whereas outspoken members of the football community....