Having jumped through any number of hoops to get hold of the original Genesis Report (various UCD fans followed numerous avenues to failure before the late Seamus Brennan got us a copy), and having confirmed with the IRFU that their Genesis Report was not being made available to the public, I'm not sure that it's fair to make a comparison. But perhaps I'm making bad assumptions, and you're connected enough to have read both reports. In my opinion, the report on Saipan was fairly pathetic. The IRFU one would have to be unspeakably bad to really "put [it] in the shade".
I assume you mean the Q&A with Padraig Smith? In fairness, he is an FAI employee - that article was always going to show the FAI in a good light. There do appear to be significant improvements to governance here, but it's not yet clear that these are effective or being implimented correctly. The perception among many fans is that licensing has been and continues to be fudged, and the financial problems of last year belie any claims that everything's suddenly rosy. I'm still willing to give it time - things were in such a bad state that it will take ages to right.Quote:
A blog piece on foot.ie seems to put the FAI in a good light re-licensing etc. If the FAI is to be believed there really has been a shift to state of the art governance structures in the Irish game.
Just one side of the argument but valid nonetheless...