Printable View
It would be exposure for the club and if kids saw Flynny and Georgie on tv they might want to go to a City game and see their new found heros in the flesh. Jeez, some people just can't seem to ever see the bigger picture.Quote:
Originally posted by applehunter
Why the hell is this a thread? Who cares if they go on the ****ing tele or not. I don't give a **** if they go on the TV or not. Hopefully they are worrying more about how they are doingh on the pitch than they are looking on TV.
Grow up
Yeah, they should have stayed at home, and Dolan shouldn't be going around to schools events in the city, and the kids enclosure at the ground should be closed and we should lose the drums and mascot for the kids.Quote:
Originally posted by applehunter
Who cares if they go on the ****ing tele or not.
we have enough fans already:rolleyes:
take the blinkers off applehunter, a club is more than the eleven guys on the field.
Mary Robinson was smart enough to do kids TV while running for president, worked fine to increase her profile......
as it turned out it was a wind-up, but i see no reason to come out against the idea of it.
If we want to grow as a club, we have to raise our profile. TV is apparently quite good at achieving things like that. We need more tv exposure, not just a few minutes on a highlights package every Monday night around midnight. Plus, if we can get the kids hooked on live football before they turn into alcoholic, bar stool Aston Villa/Spurs/etc supporters, then it can lead to great things.Quote:
Originally posted by applehunter
Who cares if they go on the ****ing tele or not. I
guess who wasn't invited :DQuote:
Originally posted by applehunter
Why the hell is this a thread? Who cares if they go on the ****ing tele or not. I don't give a **** if they go on the TV or not. Hopefully they are worrying more about how they are doingh on the pitch than they are looking on TV.
Grow up