It's in the third post. Like he said, read the thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
Printable View
It's in the third post. Like he said, read the thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
You have to take the word literally, er, literally.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
Why the past tense? Or are penalties for infractions around here much stricter than I imagined?Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
Voluntary or not, someone's still stepping in to arbitrarily limit his cyber-freedom. Hence, it is authoritarianism.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Ummm - it's him! Therefore it's not authoritarian. :rolleyes:
Ye all have a vote lads. I'm just minding them for ye.
I can't believe I'm arguing over such a dumb thing, but........Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
He has asked for a ban, yes. dahamsta is the one doing the banning, hence 'asserting his authority' over Gavin.
Just as when a rabidly authoritarian fascist candidate gets elected, it's still authoritarianism, in spite of the fact that he may have been elected on that promise.
Now for God's sake let's stop bickering over this. :D
its like reading your own obituary!
and getting to reply! :DNo I didn't!Quote:
Originally Posted by deecay
Damn you and your blatant stealing of my witty comeback remarkQuote:
Originally Posted by L37Ultra
They should make coffee with added ritalinQuote:
Originally Posted by Cymro
I sense a logical flaw in your argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by rambler14
We're woeful, what are you on?Quote:
They could do no wrong in his eyes, even though they are crap like.
Bravo! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Marked Man
Ah nuts, he's back.
Such an attention seekerQuote:
Originally Posted by GavinZac
No, I post on internet forums because I don't want people to hear what I think. That'd be awfully attention seeking.Quote:
Originally Posted by joema
Haha yeah right, I'd say you're loving having your own dedicated thread :p
I count two so far, how life-affirming! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by joema