Quote:
Originally posted by tiktok
1. you're not a city fan and go to support your pal, perfectly acceptable. but as he warms the bench you become frustrated, losing objectivity. the rest of us are city fans, and aren't against andrews but having seen little of him we assume he hasn't impressed dolan. we're going to clash heads when you criticise players we see as being good for the team we support.
2. everyone has their favourite players, naps is one of mine, and while i've been a city fan i started off thinking he was brutal, he won me over to where i think he's the best man-marker city have ever had. i'd like to see him get a run, but i won't criticise murray and benno because they are doing a good job. you have to put the club before individual players, that's why you tend to annoy.
3. that's the managers call, i thought he should be ahead of daly, but reports of the games daly has played have been good, so again, we go back to the question, has he done enough to impress.
4. all posts are valid, therefore critical replies to your own are equally valid, however not all arguments have the same merits. you've a right to express opinions, and debate, but your obvious bias towards andrews doesn't lend to your credibility. you have made some good points but the andrews agenda often detracts from them.
personally, i hope that andrews does well at cobh, i've heard great reports of him as an underage player (and with competitive games under his belt he should progress). if he does well, i look forward to have him back at city, we need as strong a squad as possible. our collective city bummy is fine, steven, you're not that good. keep on posting though, it's always entertaining;)