You're talking to a man who follows a club who haven't won the fecking thing in 46 years...
I just think that the long term success of the club would be better served by playing in the Premier league than by winning the cup and getting relegated.
Printable View
You're talking to a man who follows a club who haven't won the fecking thing in 46 years...
I just think that the long term success of the club would be better served by playing in the Premier league than by winning the cup and getting relegated.
Pats have won the league several (not getting into that argument!) times in the past 10 years, we've won nothing. You've seen Pats win the league and just about stay up, which meant more?
It's a reasonable point but I want us to win something! Tbh, I think it boils down to the length of the stay in the first division. If we were to stay there for 10 years, I'd agree but I reckon it would only be for a year or two and in that case, the cup win would be worth to me.Quote:
I just think that the long term success of the club would be better served by playing in the Premier league than by winning the cup and getting relegated.
Remind me how 1984 came about?
Not to necessarily agree with schumi (though not going to disagree either), I'm assuming he's arguing on the basis that our club structure is such that, if we go down, we'll bounce straight back up again (like we did the last time). In that case, the question becomes one of whether you would pay for a Cup win with one successful season in the First Division.
Of course.
'' It was the 4th of April 1984 and the clocks struck thirteen'' is something close to the opening line of 1984 :D