Originally Posted by
jebus
I personally believe that 10 years is long enough to have one head of state at the helm, personaly I prefer the US model of eight years and you're out as I think politicans and their ideas grow stale over time, this ha been shown through Blair failing to realise that he is completely out of touch with the British voter (even more so than two years ago), George W's approval ratings sliding with each passing year, Chirac being..well Chirac, Bertie losing his man of the people touch somwhat, and even Clinton towards the end of his second term had lost some of the spark that made people like him