Drogheda United will never be "finished".
Printable View
if the stadium falls through and the directors pull out, who on earth would take it on and cover over 1m debt that someone else built up. No one. Need to be honest with ourselves.
Now maybe not finsihed literally as maybe a non leagueclub woud form under the banner DUFC but that would be it.
Besides we are only halfway through the gamble and with the help of God we will get the stadium that we so desparately need.
Why would you as a football fan care? Would you not be more worried that Drogheda United would cease to exist. The new FAI rules (including lcensing) mean a club can't just fold the holding company behind it and start again (as loads of clubs have in the past (Drogheda being one of the latest). Let the property millionaires worry about getting their money back themselves. They wanr to build a village with 5,000 homes. A couple of million is nothing compared to thataQuote:
But if we go under where will the 1 million or so owed to the directors go - who would pay it?
As for Pats, not one of our fans thought the debt was manageable some months ago and any visitors to our MB will find 100s of threads asking the type of questions stu is asking of Drogheda. Even with Kelleher on board we won't have a bottomless pit of money (he has two of these BTW), his plans for the club are to become self sufficient withina number of years (He's outtng up the money for the capital expenditure at the start of his era)
Its the head in the sand attitude from some fans that buugs the hell out of me. How ****ing dare anybody question any fan on this forum or any other when all they point out are cold hard facts?!
who has a head in the sand?
Wreaklessly run clubs?
'Recklessly' run spelling classes you must have attended so. ;)
Could I just say this: THERE'S NO 'W' IN RECKLESS.
Also, wreakless is a very old word meaning unrevengeful or weak.
Thank you.
Dodge am wondering if you now trying to wind me up - where did I have a go at him. I asked him to provide the figure as I know he has some background (from previous posts) in the finanical area and he would be able to provide figures which I know due to his honesty would be factual rather than someone trying to present bulls***te figures just to suit their arguement.
Have a go at Ste - are you for real?
I've argued this point before on other threads, the problem really centres on players contracts, the risk to Drogs is directors willing to invest now, but not undertaking to continue to see out the remainder of players contract after they step down, thats what causes chaos. As they know the situation in the club looking for their money back is not likely to arise as the only option would be to sell the asset, and I don't believe that were going to have a Milltown mark 2 scenario 20 years on.
thanks Ronnie, well put.
But they don't even have the asset yet as the buy back clause for Utd Park is that the sale must go towards a new ground so there is no chance of the getting the hands on Utd Park to pay back the loans - so in essence they are tied into the long term futue of DU or else write off their loans as a bad debt.
You point on contracts is very valid and as I have stated before it would probably destroy us if they did decide to cut their losses and deem the new ground a lost cause etc.
Yes but if DU goes out of business because of losing its licence then the land is all theirs no?
no the fai own the ground not dufc. its only handed over if the club prove it has another ground and the money from the sale of utd park goes towards it.
what is the up to date info on the stadium and housing plan, as these seems central to drogs future
last I heard (could be wrong though) some vote in the council (or review) will be made around august. Heard so many things about the stadium at this sage I tend to ignore most of it, I am at the point that I won't beleive it until I see the first blocks laid.