The 'papers usually preface naming the person with "it is reported"
Printable View
The 'papers usually preface naming the person with "it is reported"
Hang the fook on. Just because there isn't the evidence to convict doesn't mean they weren't attacked. People cleared are innocent, but at the same time you can't just assume that because there is no conviction the other party lied. If the accussed being cleared meant automatic conviction for the accussor then that 3% figure would be worthless - cases would never be brought.Quote:
Originally Posted by anto1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macy
again im refering to 3 case's in which the girl lied ,she consented to sex and then claimed rape , the judge even said in one that she had invented the rape as a way to justify what she had done .
97 % dont get a conviction so surely there must be women claiming they were raped , when is the last time you heard of a woman getting jail time for false rape allegations ?.
it hinders the case's of genuine rape victims that do need to be taken seriously but doubt has been cast over there case because of such women lieing , in a fair world it shouldnt be like that but thats the way the world is .
after all those case's every time you hear of a story involving a prem player and a rape case espeically when they go to the sun first to sell the story then to the cops ,
do you think hang the scum bag for raping the poor girl or this is a scam ??
i think scam because of past case's , and what im afraid of is there will come a time when so many of these case's have come and gone that no one will belive the girl when it actually happens .
Again, this is looking to be all smoke and mirrors; in other words total horse-sh1t.
See the stun sez it so its gotta be true.
Paul, do not name names without sources.
And what of it when it's the accussed running to the paper denying it?Quote:
Originally Posted by anto1208
And thats the end of this thread.:rolleyes:
no im just saying yer not a knob.
Name calling - always shows intelligence.Quote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
Read the thread - no names. It puts Foot.ie in jepordy. I'm sure Adam will delete asap.
Paul, Adam has been informed of this. He'll decide what to do with you. Thanks for reading the clear instructions of the thread before you did that.:rolleyes:
Paul, this thread has boundaries, and rules that we all go to great lengths not to cross or break. I suggest you do the same.
How many players have actually been convicted of rape arising from some gash story that appears in the red tops? None that I can recall. Basically some slapper out to make a few quid for herself cries wolf, the wild specualtion begins and its all forgotten about in a few weeks. I can't believe anyone actually takes any notice of this rubbish anymore.
The Daily Star over here has actually gone as far as saying it's a young Manchester United player. Hmmmm I wonder.....
Was about to make the same point. They must be very sure of their ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse
In a way this is a worse situation because every one of the accuseds young team-mates will be a suspect until it comes to court.:confused:
If what gets to court??:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by CollegeTillIDie
This is, at most, an allegation thats being investigated. No arrests have been made, and the police have said this morning that it is increasingly likely that the individual involved won't have any case to answer.Stop all the idle speculation about court cases etc.
why? its a great bit of scandal.Quote:
Originally Posted by joeSoap
well, not for the young one involved, obviously
im not sayin it did or didnt happen, but these girls shouldnt be going back to players' houses, everyone knows the reputation some players have, so why put yourself in that situation, you konw yourself going back that something is expected etc.
not advocating it at all but ye know what i mean. rovers dont be so sure its a girl crying wolf
Thread locked. Do I need to tell you who's to blame?