Printable View
The report shouldn't be in the public domain in the 1st place! If it turns out the whole thing is sub judice having a potential key piece of evidence in circulation could be viewed as being prejudicial.
I would have thought a former public representative well used to the rule of law would have realised this?
Muppet.
Sorry. I'm lost (happens a lot, I know). Who are you referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by OneRedArmy
Fintan Cassidy used to be a councillor. I assume that's what he's talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by BohDiddley
I thinks hes talking about Fintan Cassidy - the bloke who posted the report.
He was elected to Dublin City Council a few years ago, as an independent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BohDiddley
I was thinking exactly the same thing - isn't that report a Confidential Document?
Something that should NOT be given to all and sundry?
You never see any Premiership Assessor reports being posted on the Arsenal, Chelsea or Manchester United forums?
Seems to me that Shelbourne are acting in an unprofessional manner here - maybe an attempt at getting said report ruled null and void (as highlighted above in the prejudicial posting) if it ever went any further...