Sorry-it was sincereQuote:
Originally Posted by Gerrit
Printable View
Sorry-it was sincereQuote:
Originally Posted by Gerrit
Gerrit, where the hell did you hear that? :eek: That's rotten! :eek: :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerrit
im sorry i cant beleive that either.
Thought that wasn't allowed either.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
in my (very) limited experience I have found it to be true that are more progressive and more vocal elements in the COI. But its also true to say that some Catholic priests would be even more progressive and straight-talking, unfortunately for them, the quasi-facist hierarchy of that church usually forces them into silence.
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't this all about 'every sp-rm is sacred' ? If that is the case then the above method is just as big a waste! So does this mean that you have a wet dream that you are in the bad books?Quote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
If you had borrowed my sleeping bag, then yes :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelsman
you are fooked, if so shelsmanQuote:
So does this mean that you have a wet dream that you are in the bad books?
Isn't it just the Rhythm Method that is allowed, abstaining during ovulation.?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelsman
You'll go straight to hell with those wet dreams Shelsman! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Shelsman
is that your method? did you clarify that with the local priest? and why have the capital letters? i actually have to say, it is credit to the posters on this forum that this subject has remained in good taste without any defamation etc. :cool:Quote:
Isn't it just the Rhythm Method that is allowed, abstaining during ovulation.?
:mad: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
The priest wasn't too keen at first, but he's ok with it now. We just have 6 children ;) :D
it worked well then! ye would have had a lot more otherwise!Quote:
We just have 6 children
:D :eek: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
Sperm arn't sacred-that's a misconception (helped along by Monty Python).Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelsman
Catholicism teaches that human life is sacred and that human life begins at the moment of conception.
The issue is that sex should be for the pupouse of reproduction i.e. if you are having sex it is up to God whether a baby is concieved or not-otherwise you are right, a wet dream would be genocide-which it is not.
see thats where wording helps out, technically what you are saying is that the catholic church only condone sex in the case that you are trying to reproduce, but it is up to god whether you are successful, so you can have sex as much as you want under the pretense that you are trying to conceive. is that correct?Quote:
The issue is that sex should be for the pupouse of reproduction
see that is where i thought that you were only allowed to have sex to reproduce i.e. around ovulation time.
that also makes sense as the point about ivf treatment is now being raised by the government, because the church see it as "improper intervention", as its god s choice whether or not you should conceive or whether a child is to be created even. is that correct all-knowning liam? :p
:confused: :(Quote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
sorry liam i was only messin, you seem to know so i was just wondering sorry :o
AKA in my crib as 'The John Holmes Method.' :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
You'll find most religions are like that. Talking 'happy, feely' with the CoI is one thing. Try the same with the Free Presbyterians or the Jehovah's Witnesses next time they knock on your door about the virtues of the RC church and they'll both claim you follow 'the whore of Rome,' as mentioned in the book of Revelations.Quote:
Originally Posted by samuel
Actually I'd agree that there is some truth to this. Don't know about research but anecdotal evidence suggests that the 'silver ring thing' being promoted in the US as a Christian alternative to pre-marital sex increases oral sex (and some anal sex). I think, like most things, people should take a responsible approach to this subject, in this case to sex before marriage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerrit
Bejaysus ...we're on page three and no ones ****ed in the holy water yet.
Good going you guys and gals.
I think it was Dylan Thomas who said "You must respect the other fellows religious belief -but only as far as you respect his belief that his wife is pretty and his children intelligent."
let's keep that in mind and we'll all be fine.
The late JP2 of the RCC had less than no interest whatsoever in ecumenism. His vision of uniting the christian church involved the other christian churches -be they protestant, Eastern Orthodox, gnostic or Cathar -copping on to themselves and coming back into the fold.
As for any of those churches uniting within our lifetime -I'd say you'd get meaner odds down the bookies on any of them ceasing to exist within our lifetime.