The one tiny flaw in that plan is that to consistently enter at the first round, you have to consistently get beaten.
Printable View
The one tiny flaw in that plan is that to consistently enter at the first round, you have to consistently get beaten.
To be fair I meant in a scenario where it was marginal between being in Q1 or Q2, I would rather things improved for sure where we were entering later and winning consistently, .
it does read negatively reading back on it now but I guess I'm embittered by age and experience : )
You can't possibly go forward by regressing that far - that's all I guess.
Due to dropping coefficient points it seems that both Cork and Shamrock Rovers might be unseeded in that first round. The cut off point this year was 3.625 but Shamrock Rovers have dropped to 3.065, Cork has improved to 2.565 while Pats stay just above with a reduced 4.315.
(Dundalk heroics will only boost it significantly with a few more wins/qualifying). Dundalk's exploits show what can/should be done but other clubs need to follow and improve on performances in Europe. Dundalk's exploits this year can be easily undone by failing to improve further... Obviously the cutoff point could be higher or lower (cant see how it was in previous years on Bert's site) but overall, despite Dundalk's exploits our league is still 37th... ie closer to the bottom than we should be). A fair few "results" away from Finland, Iceland, Modova, Liechtenstein.
We were never going to be seeded next year. we would have needed to do what Dundalk did to have a chance. our history as far as our coefficient is considered was this year and last year. our most recent European appearance before last summer was 2008.
Pats and Dundalk were the only teams that could possibly be seeded next season
From a fans' perspective, you get an extra away trip out of it. You a decent chance of going away and getting a win.
For example, 2013, when we went straight into the second round unseeded and drew Trabzonspor. Awkward to get to, costly, poor travelling crowd (for both sides), not much hope of progression (negative thinking, I know). Bit of an anti-climax.
Compare that to 2014, entering in the first round, seeded, drawing Aberystwyth. Handy and cheap trip for fans, we brought hundreds over, won 9-0, craic was ninety.
Whilst we all enjoy the league, there's something special about European football. It's what people will still be taking about in 20, 30, 40 years time. You still hear ones talking about us beating FK Lyn in 1965 even.
So, aye, if it's borderline between getting into the first or second qualifying round, I'll happily take the first.
(All well and good until you get a Faroese team mind!)
Back in the day when you got coefficient points for wins and draws you were better off starting in the first round.
I think each coefficient point Dundalk get earns .25 for everyone else, so even another draw could make the difference between Rovers or Pats being seeded / unseeded.
It really couldn't. Each win is worth 0.1, each draw is worth 0.05, and that only counts for next season. Dundalk wins will have no impact on other clubs from here on out. Maybe if you win the thing you might get Rovers seeded.
I thought the country coefficient went up by a quarter of the total club coef, so 1 point in the group was worth .25 to other clubs?
EDIT: ah yes.... and then divided by 5 as it's counted over 5 years :(
Anyway the coefficient of your little clubs is of no concern to me.... evil laugh
The good news is you won't be going to the Faroes. No Faroese team will be seeded. You also won't be going to Wales unless TNS collapse as no other Welsh team can be seeded. Scotland and Northern Ireland will have seeded teams, so you might have a short journey.
Someone on berts site kindly went to the bother of translating Russian and coming up with some ideas for next year and for 2018
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1610432354
Looks like no Irish clubs will be seeded next year, which is a bit of a fecker, and if they get tough draws well that's that then. Oh how costly that miss by Kilduff
But I do like the look of the new format. Sure its virtually impossible to get into the CL main league, but the Europa definitely looks much easier now for the LOI champs? Plus the added advantage of more games in Europe and more exotic trips
For the co efficients reverting to ten years, would that not give LOI teams a slight advantage in seeding over some of the newer countries? Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, etc?
One hour long show on eir now about Dundalk.
Fair dues to eir; really pushing the league
Linfield or cliftonville would be good. Low expense and good chance of a win.
So Dundalk would miss out on a seeding spot by one place, if all those teams make it. I was doing my own bit of analysis a couple weeks ago and I had them in as the last seeded side. Time will tell.
Irish sports writers have given Dundalk great coverage this year. A fitting summary of the away games by Daniel McDonnell.
http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...-35329096.html
The newly-agreed Champions League and Europa League BT-deal takes effect from 2018, but I'll stick Emmet Malone's piece on it and how it may benefit qualifying LOI clubs here as it seems to be the most appropriate already-existing thread for it.
'BT deal has potentially big implications for top Irish clubs': http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/socc...lubs-1.3001095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmet Malone
Just a little early I know, but a hell a lot of teams have wrapped up their leagues already (Basel, Celtic.....Chelsea)
Back again for another season:o
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...BIW6UTgpCoOwpY
Looks like Dundalk wont be seeded so
Heh, an even earlier bird already got there before you: http://foot.ie/threads/217098-League...in-Europe-2017
:)