Originally Posted by
kingpin4
Having good quality and covering ground are worlds apart. Hughes may be more energetic, but in terms of him unlocking defences, he doesn't hold a candle to Bradley. I know he split opinion, but I know I'd much rather have Bradley if we're trying to break down UCD away from home.
We didn't lose Gamble to Bruneii, we lost him and then he went. He had a huge falling out with Taylor towards the end and told him he was leaving so didn't want to talk about contracts. He's been one that really should have been a priority to replace and Duggan is decent, but he's left on his own in the middle so trying to do too much. If we had kept O'Leary then Duggan could have been left to focus on his own job. When we left Bradley go, we should have made O'Leary a priority, but we messed up his situation.
