No idea of the details as I speak neither language, but to this outsider it looks clear-cut enough. They're Finns (part of sovereign Finland, which they accept I believe largely because Helsinki offers them autonomy which Stockholm might not), but they're also Swedes (speaking the langiage and identifying with others who do). What's the problem?Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Invincible
You're the one who wants it, you tell me. But you need to get beyond that blind spot ie assuming that you can define the Irish nation and exclude those who disagree.Quote:
How would that work exactly? One for the Irish nation and another for that other nation... What's it called again?
Aye, so what? The majority ain't 100%, you are simply ignoring the obvious minority that disagrees with you.Quote:
what the Irish Republic does do is represent or channel an Irishness distinct from Britain or Britishness, which is undeniably the type of Irishness with which the vast majority of people on the island identify
Your loss. It's a very restrictive, ostrich-like attitude.Quote:
For me, to consider Irish as a subset of Britishness is just something I cannot really accept, as is probably evident
Poor analogy. England and Germany are separate (though individual identities may overlap), part of Ireland is obviously part of Britain (the British state, to avoid confusion).Quote:
To me, viewing Irishness as a subset of Britishness would be like viewing Englishness as a subset of German
I'll avoid any BNP comparisons.