Exactly. They should give it to a Dutchman. That'd be met with unanimous approval. Keep Irish people way from Irish football, that's what I say. And foreigners.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
Printable View
Exactly. They should give it to a Dutchman. That'd be met with unanimous approval. Keep Irish people way from Irish football, that's what I say. And foreigners.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razors left peg
Im far from against Irish fellas gettin the jobs, in fact Im on record plenty of times on this forum saying that I wanted an ex irish international of the likes of Kenny Cunningham to get the u21 job when it became availible because I wanted someone in the job with ambition to get results, learn international management and someday move into the senior job. My problem with Noel Kings appointment was that he had a career as a LOI manager without any success and spent the best part of 10 years with the womens teams without any success until this year.Now, yes he has done very well with the u17 girls but I dont think that has any bearing on how he might manage young professional players with massive egos.... but he made a good start and now he is in the job I want him to do well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuttgart88
Doolin might not have been a career FAI man but he was certainally part of the "in" crowd in FAI circles from his job as u23 manager. I dont have a particular preference for who should have got the job but Doolin has a very poor record as others have pointed out so I dont understand what made him stand out above other candidates if it wasnt his friendship with people within the FAI Boys Club
I have only seen Drogheda a few times under Doolin and they were decently set up. I didn't see them play aimless hoof ball.
Against Kiev away they were very nicely set up.
I don't buy the 'buy success' to explain the success. Subjective opinions about past events has jack all relevance now. He has the job and we have a fair idea of the standard of the players and what's acceptable re game and results. He has the chance to prove himself in that environment.
The u17s were all right at the Finals under McCaffrey, I have little doubt that he got the best out of them, well organised, 5 in the middle, one up front and a fierce work rate but the technically superior teams were in another class. These are issues that face a youth international manager. The kids are already being coached elsewhere. His job is to organise them into as effective a team as is possible.
Roddy managed Bohs, Rovers etc etc. What's your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
Which proves he can go to courses and write essaysQuote:
Originally Posted by geysir
The bad memories are because we had to go through him managing us!Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
With us, he brought through as few youth players as possible and bought a team, which is his form., I dont see how he is in any way qualified for this position.
Is he?Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin
:D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin
Okay, Step 1-Stop taking the drugs, Step 2-rethink that comment.
Even people who liked him as a manager because of success(no one in Cork but some in Drogheda) would never claim his teams played decent football. Unless by decent football you mean be solid defensively and hoof the ball towards the other goal....
Are you saying that a club's budget is entirely irrelevant to how well they do?Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
What about the facts relating to his previous involvement in youth development which have been presented? Do they have jack all relevance now? Cos your post makes it seem as if they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
I think this logic - basically downplaying the importance of the manager - was utterly disspelled when Stan was in charge of the senior team.Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
I don't think G is downplaying the role of the manager, quite the opposite actually. The coaching of these players is the role of their club coaches, and the general coaching system in Ireland. The team manager's job is to get the best out of them when they play together for the national selection. Stan wasn't any good at this.
But Doolins main attribute has been that he's a good coach....his biggest problem has been most don't see that this translates into being a good manager..
I don't think he's a good coach either, by the way.
Players seem to think he is, maybe more in a fitness sense than footballing though. I'm not sure
No, not all all.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
I have a different definition of what is considered a fact. Nevertheless I don't dispute any of the accounts here.Quote:
What about the facts relating to his previous involvement in youth development which have been presented? Do they have jack all relevance now? Cos your post makes it seem as if they are.
And I suppose the events in Doolin's life from the past have a relevance to Doolin in the now, in as much as anybodies past experiences help shape their lives.
Stutts has understood my meaning and answered that part well.Quote:
I think this logic - basically downplaying the importance of the manager - was utterly disspelled when Stan was in charge of the senior team.
How were they set up? Just out of interest.Quote:
Originally Posted by geysir
I've heard the same thing about his coaching sessions being enjoyed by the players. Always involving the ball which should suit young international players.Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
Definitely a negative manager though and as has been pointed out he has no track record with youth players. I wouldn't write him off completely but he certainly has a lot to prove.
The question is whether there is someone better qualified and capable than Doolin of doing this job.
Imho there are plenty of Irish coaches more worthy, notably Pat Fenlon.
He's had international experience as a player (with 18s, 21s, B etc) and managed the 23s for a few games.
His record of silverware is unrivalled in the modern era and while budgets may have been kind to him at Shels and Bohs, he's shown a keen eye for developing quality talent during their late teens such as Wes Hoolohan and Gary Deegan and more recently Paddy Madden and Gary Burke.
Sadly, in this country, the FAI don't employ people whose opinion differs to theirs and Nutsy probably didn't even apply because he'd have no chance on that basis.
Aside from him, Stephen Kenny, Alan Matthews and Martin Russell over here plus Curtis Fleming in England have a lot better credentials than Doolin. Seing as the FAI place such an emphasis on Doolin's pro licence, they all have it too.
The FAI have already employed Nutsy; he was the previous U-23 manager.
I don't think you can overlook his tenure at Derry though; granted, they weren't exactly tight spenders, but I think it's a large blot for Fenlon.
Why's that relevant? Kerr had worked for the FAI under Tuohy before his second stint years later.
I was replying to your bit where you said -
But the fact is that the FAI have employed Nutsy before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf Honn
Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Sure they did, as I referred to in the original post about the 23s. But the minute he started becoming vocal about controversial matters such as Brian Murphy not getting a senior call-up, referees and the League Cup final being held in Waterford, he was blacklisted.
Granted, but it's hard not to groan when any time anybody gets a job at any level in this country and within minutes the "careerist" charge is being leveled. I wouldn't rule it out considering he has this talent for getting jobs despite having left his previous club in the lurch but I like to at least give people a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
This is a much more valid point and I can't really comment much since the ins and outs of UCD's youth system are beyond my scope of knowledge. It is a worry but he's shown with decent players at his disposal he can play winning football.Quote:
However, that's an aside. The single most worrying aspect of this is Doolin's previous record managing young players. He didn't give a fig about UCD's youth system; he preferred to buy players like Richie Purdy or Greg O'Dowd (who, while I'm sure were good in their day - both league winners after all - were both past it while at UCD). When he did dab his hand in signing young players, he signed Barry Andrews - generally cited as our worst ever player - without ever seeing him play on the basis that he'd once been with QPR and Leyton Orient.
Even more than that, we actually scratched a 21s team game under him because we didn't have enough players. Not even crap players; just didn't have enough players full stop. Look at UCD's underage record - this year, for example, we're as good as in the A League final and as good as in the U-20s quarter final - and you'll see what a remarkable achievement it is that someone disregarded a youth set-up so much as to have UCD scratch a 21s game. More than that, when Doolin jumped ship and Mahon took over, there was an immediate surge in confidence in our young players; I remember Pat Jennings in particular being transformed almost overnight. Doolin simply can't work with young players. And this person is now in charge of the national underage set-up?! Ridiculous.
But that's just by way of an analysis of the appointment. It suits me, and I think in time, he'll be seen as the new Don Givens.
At least you've gone from decent football to winning football.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin
I suppose Drogheda might have gotten their money's worth, but he can't buy anyone he wants for the Irish teams. He's going to have to make do with what's available
Does Fenlon not already have a job? What was Doolin doing before this appointment?