Originally Posted by
Lionel Ritchie
That's fair comment Anto but there are, at the very least, important technical differences. Jackson has no conviction. He's been through the system, faced a judge and jury and walked out of court a free man with his good name and right to same legally intact.
He did indeed pay off at least one accuser, I don't remember all the details but I believe others here may confirm that his legal councel pretty much begged him not to as it'd be tantamount to an admission that he'd a case to answer ...as well as potentially leading to other similar claims from opportunists.
In short, it has not been established beyond reasonable doubt that he interfered with children -regardless of what inferences can be drawn from evidence presented.
Paul Gadd is an unreconstructed predator who doesn't see what the big deal is with his activities. Incidently, I personally do have a bit of a problem with the way the Glitter Band got written out of pop history. No great good is served by it. My Gang, Rock N Roll and I Love You Love didn't stop being excellent glamrock just because the man who sang them is a deviant.
If art wasn't seperated from artist -the contents of our libraries, record shops and educational curriculums would be a lot thinner.