We're safe.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

30/01/2009, 6:07 PM
the sub

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesd

Yes ultimately a top level decision to get rid of people who are entitled to their opinion at all times.

A top level decision to get rid of anyone that questions any wrong doings in the club.

Ye talk about democracy, what a joke. Where was the democracy in not accepting the vote taken in December???

And any truth now that Dan Wyatt is gone too???

It is clear now that the agenda of the Chairman has nothing to do with football but rather get his own back on those who opposed his election in the first place.

If there was ever any hope of getting people together, then it is now shattered by this dictatorship move of removing members from the Club.

its over get on with your life if you you do not like the judgement go somewhere where they will listen.
I'm not a memeber of Cobh and I do not live down there, but for god sake give it a break you keep repeating yourself then waiting for the replies you know you will get back.
If the focrs were the people that went against the wishes of the full membership and leaked info to the papers/ radio, travelled to Dublin and also went the legal route against the club without the permission of the membership then the club were correct not to renew their membership as they are within their rights to do so.
After all you do have to re apply to become a member and its up to the committe to reject or accept anyone becoming a full member.
If the chairman and commette saved the club and you are in Div 1 this season well done to all concerned its a credit to one and all.
If Dan left so be it move on replace that commette member and as I said before stop this childish ranting your all a laughing stock of footie fourm
30/01/2009, 6:11 PM
the sub

Quote:

Originally Posted by luka

Cork City game is 14th lads.........afternoon kick-off. I contacted them the other day and they said 14th. Not sure about the Waterford game but will find out.

Yeah. I wasn't able to do anything with it until I knew where we stood so will be changing it over the coming weeks. I mentioned on the OFF site that we could learn alot by taking a leaf out of Athlone Town's book and get something like this going. We won't get 400 but we could certainly get 100 I'd say. See below:

I will support your club if this ranting from members stop
30/01/2009, 6:26 PM
don ramo

dan was never a member of the club, he said hed help us out with making up the financial controls, i wouldnt mind having someone like him more involved with ramblers, but if he decides not to, i thank him for his help,
30/01/2009, 7:03 PM
pcplod

Well said sub that about sums up why they should be expelled.
It is a democracy we have and just because they didnt like something they ran off to solicitors and tried getting the club caught up in a legal battle instead of showing up when asked to give their presentation and act like grown ups

Enough time has been wasted who mentioned football:ball:
30/01/2009, 7:09 PM
Ramtastic

TypicalCobh people just love a rant

Last season they were begging people to come

Now this season there turnin people away

nothing makes thenm happy
30/01/2009, 7:20 PM
pcplod

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramtastic

TypicalCobh people just love a rant

Last season they were begging people to come

Now this season there turnin people away

nothing makes thenm happy

Kettle-pot-black:rolleyes:
Maybe you should have stayed quiet for longer :p
30/01/2009, 7:26 PM
Ramtastic

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcplod

Kettle-pot-black:rolleyes:
Maybe you should have stayed quiet for longer :p

ha ha probably would have been better off

Typical of this club

the phrase

A camel is a horse designed by commitee,

comes to mind in this club
30/01/2009, 7:28 PM
Ram72

Great news. At least there is light at the end of the tunnel now.
Maybe now we can put all the sh!te behind us and get on with what Cobh Ramblers are all about FOOTBALL :cool:
30/01/2009, 8:32 PM
thegafferman

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesd

Yes ultimately a top level decision to get rid of people who are entitled to their opinion at all times.

A top level decision to get rid of anyone that questions any wrong doings in the club.

Ye talk about democracy, what a joke. Where was the democracy in not accepting the vote taken in December???

And any truth now that Dan Wyatt is gone too???

It is clear now that the agenda of the Chairman has nothing to do with football but rather get his own back on those who opposed his election in the first place.

If there was ever any hope of getting people together, then it is now shattered by this dictatorship move of removing members from the Club.

no truth in dan leaving he is meeting the players as we speak ......
30/01/2009, 8:40 PM
Ramtastic

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegafferman

no truth in dan leaving he is meeting the players as we speak ......

once again someone stickin there nose in tryna get some attention by sayin he has left the club

people in this club just love a tale and love spinnin yarns
31/01/2009, 12:34 AM
jamesd

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegafferman

no truth in dan leaving he is meeting the players as we speak ......

Delighted to hear that and I apologise for even raising it. It was just something I heard and I realise it was wrong information. Thankfully it was wrong as we could do with some more professional people like him helping out.

BTW, LUKA, that bit about Athlone Town and what they are doing is excellent. I do seem to remember a suggestion about the 800 draw been mentioned before.

If Dan is overseeing everything financially, then I envisage that should inject enough confidence for members to put their hands in their pockets.
31/01/2009, 7:18 AM
jfarlo

while were at it any chance we can banish that fella ramtastic from the site/club. i believe if we leave him here he could form an opposition
31/01/2009, 7:26 AM
pcplod

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfarlo

while were at it any chance we can banish that fella ramtastic from the site/club. i believe if we leave him here he could form an opposition

While I agree he is a gobs***e. I dont think the matters of the expulsions should be laughed at, as I believe they are justified and over quite a serious matter. When people delibratly set out to try and destroy our club they should have to face the consequences
31/01/2009, 7:39 AM
Redshanks

I Just love the way Jamesd slipped in the bit about Dan Wyatt leaving, (plucked straight out of the sky) then came back in and said he'd love to see him working around fundraising.

I've got news for you Jamesd, Dan is already the financial controller; he brought in the financial controls, of which 42 people opposed. Where stood you then Jim-d?

I have no doubt that Dan and his assistant are working on fundraising plans as we speak, but the big question remains, will a certain section of the membership boycott those events again?

Do you serve under the command of captain Boycott Jamesd?:D
31/01/2009, 11:44 AM
Ramtastic

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfarlo

while were at it any chance we can banish that fella ramtastic from the site/club. i believe if we leave him here he could form an opposition

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcplod

While I agree he is a gobs***e. I dont think the matters of the expulsions should be laughed at, as I believe they are justified and over quite a serious matter. When people delibratly set out to try and destroy our club they should have to face the consequences

ive been reading all yer tit for tat nonsense for the last few months i just think i should get my chance to voice my concerns

Jesus lads ye take too much too heart

if ye cant handle the heat stay out of the kitchen
31/01/2009, 12:11 PM
jamesd

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redshanks

I Just love the way Jamesd slipped in the bit about Dan Wyatt leaving, (plucked straight out of the sky) then came back in and said he'd love to see him working around fundraising.

I've got news for you Jamesd, Dan is already the financial controller; he brought in the financial controls, of which 42 people opposed. Where stood you then Jim-d?

I have no doubt that Dan and his assistant are working on fundraising plans as we speak, but the big question remains, will a certain section of the membership boycott those events again?

Do you serve under the command of captain Boycott Jamesd?:D

Red, if you read what I posted you would see I never mentioned Dan in relation to fundraising. That should be up to each and every member to get out there and do what ever they can to bring in money.

Secondly, I never opposed Dan, in fact when someone mentioned he was gone, I got angry. He is just what this club needs.

Thirdly, I never serve under any command unlike your good self!!

Like anyone that would ever be elected to office, I would serve if elected all of whom would have elected me and more so, those that didn't!

If people ask you for help or support, you cannot get caught up in what side they are on or what politics they are. You listen to them and form your own opinion for the betterment of all you represent. Again, anyone elected to office in anything, must serve the entire organisation and not the bits they prefer!!
31/01/2009, 12:12 PM
luka

Quote:

ive been reading all yer tit for tat nonsense for the last few months i just think i should get my chance to voice my concerns

I've no doubt that you're as entitled to your opinion here just as anyone else is. I do believe though that you didn't get off on the right footing here yesterday by jumping in with some rather uncalled for comments. For what it's worth, I'm not dictating to you, simply giving my own opinion but I hope you have better days than yesterday. Many here take Ramblers as a club, and certainly the current situation very very passionately indeed and it doesn't take much for a genuinely perfect thread to descend into worthless thrash when provocation shows it's ugly face.
31/01/2009, 2:02 PM
jfarlo

i was not havin a go at "you" ramtastic, but some of your comments are a bit strong. you must realise that a good few of the people that post here are in each others pockets and are preaching from the same book. Be prepared to be attacked if you question comittee decisions
31/01/2009, 6:52 PM
Redshanks

I presume jfarlo isnt refering to the other committee (in waiting).

By the way, unless no one has noticed, Ramtastic on another thread speaks about 'Us' -in others again, its 'Ye'. make up yere own minds!
31/01/2009, 6:57 PM
6yardpunisha

[quote=Redshanks;1096187]I presume jfarlo isnt refering to the other committee (in waiting).

By the way, unless no one has noticed, Ramtastic on another thread speaks about 'Us' -in others again, its 'Ye'. make up yere own minds![/quote]

Ramspastic not a well boy by the sounds of most of his posts so far, he should lay off the skittles and coca cola

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page