I'm not sure how, but there has just got to be a way to blame all this on James McClean.
Has the mysterious, phone-nabbing 'someone' been identified? Could be an opportunity..
Printable View
I'm not sure how, but there has just got to be a way to blame all this on James McClean.
Has the mysterious, phone-nabbing 'someone' been identified? Could be an opportunity..
I doubt he could pass it onto McClean, as somehow tens of thousands get crushed in the stampede in the effort to get offended by a McClean intervention on Twitter.
But as Shane tweets, this is a restricted offended scenario.
'Mostly all rangers and Northern Ireland fans giving me abuse? Give it a rest would use.'
The only viable long-term solution seems to be a complete prohibition on people from Derry using social media. They just can't be trusted.
@Phil_Coulter lol #suckstobefromderry #irelandscallissh!te
It has to be said Footballers and Social media are not a good mix come to think of it I have seen some amount of sectarian/offensive crap posted on there by people I used to work with so its just not a good mix all round! Even before McClean had his Poppy incident there was some amount of abuse and even threats being posted by these boys and ironically they are probably outraged by McClean's later twitter posts and now Duffy.
He tweeted these earlier: https://twitter.com/ShaneDuffy34/sta...53590983532544 and https://twitter.com/ShaneDuffy34/sta...53683883155457
Quote:
I am mortified by the tweet and apologise for any upset caused. The tweet was sent by a third party after my phone was taken......
........I clearly would never send out a message of that nature and steps will be taken to avoid any further recurrence.
Shanes father posted this on Facebook
Quote:
shane was out for paddys nite last night ...a song came on in the nite club and he went out to dance with his beautiful girlfriend,left his phone on the table and some d**khead wrote up the ra on his twitter acount...now what will happen is the fa with fine him our everton will fine him...he has apoligised so many times on twitter but the norn iron fans have taken it on board and are out raged...i dont blame them to be honest shane would never say any thing like that its not the way we brough him up....he has said sorry for leaving his phone down but and the end of the day it will be a lesson learned....gutted some pr!ck could think that was funny when shane has almost 50,000 people following him...he is big enough to get over things like this and we will move on...
.....
So there's the answer. Let your PR/ agent manage the twitter account, or at least take her along to the shebeen on nights out. Probably best to ask Dad not to involve while you're at it.
About the same value as your own, G. And no less sensible. Remember this is a public discussion board, not restricted to your pretensions. For the little that it's worth, a couple of Everton supporters I spoke to (one from a village outside Warrington) think that he's immature and dishonest and would be best served by apologising unreservedly.
What is the Twitter equivalent of a "frape" actually called?
t watted.
EDIT: sorry didnt realise we needed to portray how it sounds (thanks POSH). So above, in broad Liam Gallagher Manc.....
Why did the Father feel the need to mention how visually appealing his girlfriend is?
And dont come back and tell me he meant beautiful on the inside.
:D
I apologise for hurt my post caused, which didn't know what value to put on your imaginations
I imagined that you just happened to be passing through Warrington, when news of Duffy's tweet hit the newsstand.Quote:
For the little that it's worth, a couple of Everton supporters I spoke to (one from a village outside Warrington) think that he's immature and dishonest and would be best served by apologising unreservedly.
'Everton under-21 boss Alan Stubbs hails stand-out performance from Shane Duffy': http://www.goal.com/en-ie/news/3942/...ails-stand-out
Quote:
The Toffees youth coach has praised the Republic of Ireland under-21 captain's performance against Fulham and noted Tony Hibbert's influence
Everton under-21 coach Alan Stubbs has praised defender Shane Duffy after his side's 1-1 draw with Fulham under-21s.
The Republic of Ireland under-21 captain scored for the young Toffees side and crashed a shot off the cross-bar during the draw and Stubbs hailed the 21-year-old as one of the "stand-out peformers".
Tony Hibbert made a return to action after a four-month injury layover and Stubbs believes that the right-back's presence helped the youthful defence.
"The game was all about [Tony Hibbert] and getting him 60 minutes. That was the most important thing," Stubbs told evertontv.
"Just by him being there is a big help to the lads playing around him. His presence allowed Tyias [Browning] and Shane [Duffy] to play and know the right places where they should be.
"I thought that was evident in their displays because I thought they were our stand-out performers."
Duffy, who has made three appearances for David Moyes' side this season, is the current captain of Everton's under-21 side.
Duffy's scored a few goals for the reserves this season
A Póg Mo Goal piece summarising Duffy's career to date: http://pogmogoal.com/the-blog-reel/u...ack-kid/13436/
Turns out he turned down an invite to Darron Gibson's stag party in Marbella to captain our under-21s against Denmark recently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Póg Mo Goal
Is it time for duffy to leave everton to further his career?
Played 90 minutes in Everton's first pre-season game against Austria Vienna, which they lost 2-1. Didn't have the best of games and his handball gave away a penalty, but interesting that Martinez paired him with both Distin and Jagielka. Gibson also played a part in the game and Martinez praised his influence as a senior player.
Next friendly is on Wednesday v Accrington Stanley, who are they?
no, he said if you don't drink lots of milk, you'll only be good enough to play for them
the kid from the ad was brought back to the stadium when they got promoted to League Two: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...re/4788038.stm
I am not sure if milk is actually very good for you, let's face it it is unnatural for adults to drink it for starters.
Also 75% of people can digest it properly ( the body never developed the ability to digest it beyond childhood for obvious reasons).
Also milk is bad for the bones (contrary to the advertising) those who drink the most milk have the weakest bones.
Obviously when farmers have slaughtered all the calves they ain't gonna pour the milk down the drain hence the heavy marketing.
Fair haired/skinned people tend to be able to digest it, blacks generally can't and don't drink it much.
It's "unnatural" for people to ingest lots of things. Like cooked food for example.
Milk is a great source of loads of nutrients, and if you're not lactose intolerant (and most northern Europeans aren't), it's a good thing to drink. Better than endless soft drinks anyway (I have friends who drink up to ten cans of coke a day. I have no idea how a human can do that!)
You're both being silly. It is "natural" for people to ingest anything the human digestive system is capable of processing, ie whatever they can find. Drinking cow's milk might be a bit parasitic but it's certainly not unnatural.
Can or can't? Most people from northern European and other agricultural stock can digest milk - it's quite a common and beneficial mutation.Quote:
Also 75% of people can digest it properly ( the body never developed the ability to digest it beyond childhood for obvious reasons).
No, people who have the weakest bones drink the most milk. Because milk is very good for the bones.Quote:
Also milk is bad for the bones (contrary to the advertising) those who drink the most milk have the weakest bones.
They slaughter the calves because all they want is the milk.Quote:
Obviously when farmers have slaughtered all the calves they ain't gonna pour the milk down the drain hence the heavy marketing.
It depends on your definition of "natural". If you take it to its conclusion, everything humans do is natural, because we're animals, and as such are part of the natural world (and I do realise that's not the way the word is normally used). That's not the point I was trying to make, however. Humans have been drinking animal milk for probably somewhere of the same order of time as we've been cooking our food. If drinking milk is unnatural, cooking our food is as well (and I don't think either is, I know people who are part of the "raw food" movement, and they're a bunch of wild-eyed crusties on a par with the anti-fluoridation and 9/11 Truther crowd)
For what its worth, most dairy farmers don't slaughter calves..
Do calves produce milk?