Looks like Adrian wasn't the solution to WHAM's problems.
Printable View
Looks like Adrian wasn't the solution to WHAM's problems.
West Ham's half arsed effort was much more a factor than Adrian, who actually had a very good game I thought and blameless for any of the goals. He made a lot of decent saves to keep them in it at 0-0 and 0-1. He had kept three clean sheets in a row prior to that too to be fair.
Interesting comments from Packie Bonner regarding Randolph - http://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/s...-1-450241.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packie Bonner on Randolph's situation at West Ham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packie Bonner on Randolph being thrown in at the deep end against Germany
He does a good long ball and that suits Long........
O'Neill discusses the goalkeeping situation - http://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/s...ne-451805.html
I have a feeling he'll go for Westwood.
There has been more focus on the choice between the two keepers in the media this week than there has been in the earlier part of the campaign and O'Neill has been a bit more positive in public about KW than he has been too. I'm wondering if MON is beginning to doubt Randolph especially after the Uruguay blunder. He'll have noticed a tendency to get caught in no mans land. It's just a hunch based on crumbs of evidence.
I agree with all of this although I don't have any major feeling as to what O'Neill will decide. I'm not going to be a bit surprised either way but I think one thing is for certain, this is Westwood's best chance of being selected since Randolph broke into the side. I feel O'Neill is genuinely disappointed that Randolph didn't take his chance to remain as West Ham's number one. He'll also realise that he wasn't just dropped for the fun of it. The error the last day might just have tipped the balance alright.
Instead of going from strength to strength, I think Randolph gets found out the more he plays. It's logical that the more you play the more mistakes you can make, but it also allows you the opportunity to build up enough good will that the occasional blunder will be overlooked. Westwood has done that at Sheffield Wednesday, I think he could have a string of dodgy performances at club level now and still have their supporters on side, given his overall consistency (and brilliance) over three years. Randolph's errors are a bit too frequent I think.
You're shifting quotes from thread to thread, Del.
That quote from me is taken out of context, from another thread where I was replying to Lionel.
Players moving up a level and given a decent opportunity to prove themselves there, either stay within the boundaries of their ability, improve or disimprove.
By today's standards, relating to tolerance levels of error prone goalies, Randolph was handed a rare opportunity by West Ham.
I don't see it that his skill levels were exposed, he simply got worse by allowing more errors into his game. Afaics, he still has top goalkeeping skill levels and a lovely strike of the ball.
Fair enough, and I wouldn't entirely disagree. By being 'found out', I meant the quantity of errors have accumulated a bit too rapidly for my liking, he's still capable of doing some very good things and performing well though, that goes without saying I think.
I would add that it's a bit disappointing that a high percentage of his mistakes are actually coming from not dealing with crosses, an area where he really excels at times and looked excellent early on.
I agree with this. He has real talent and is a super ball striker. I remember all those years ago when his underage manager McCaffrey said he had everything. Full of expectation I then saw him fumble a straightforward ball against England U21s and he generally didn’t impress.
The issue isn’t his talent, it’s more his concentration and/or judgment. Any time I’ve been disappointed in him it’s been for highly avoidable, basic stuff. He tends to do the hard things well.
I really like how he brought authority to the position from the moment he took to the pitch against Germany but I have to go with my instinct and think I’d be more comfortable with Westwood. Marginal.
I just posted a link to a Dan McD article favouring Westwood for this match. I thought it was more relevant in the match build-up thread.
O'Neill on his decision to stick with Randolph for the Austria game: http://www.the42.ie/randolph-westwoo...38916-Jun2017/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin O'Neill
Some save against Austria and O'Neill seems to have a lot of faith in him.
Joe Hart set for a medical at West Ham. I don't see any Premier League sides coming in for him so is it the last we'll see of Randz in the EPL?
Deal agreed to sign for the Boro:
http://m.bbc.com/sport/football/40690832
Fee mooted to be £4.5m.
Decent move for him and for Ireland. Can't complain too much.