FAI Junior Cup 2009/10

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fairkop

For starters even if his full name wasn`t on the card why would shannon hibs try and pull a fast one if they didn`t think he was signed and name or play him in the first place doh! (think about it until it sinks in).
Another valid question is what grounds did regional think they had a case for an objection after the match ie. what prompted them to look for the match card immediately after the game?
And for your info. sergio is his name .
The only serious doubt is where did regional get the go ahead to pursue this as you don`t go fishing for the card after every defeat checking to see is everyone signed up unless you have genuine grounds or in this case there is more going on than we know about.
One last point, if regional think they have a divine right to be in the next round that they can`t beat a div. 1b side anyway they have high opinions about themselves and hopefully the wheel will come around for them.

---

This seems like a very honest mistake and is a very grey area when dealing with foreigners who have much different name styles than us paddies. If he was not illegal or suspended then the result should stand. Otherwise you could have appeals based on a simple mispelling of a name. Unless there are other grounds for appeal then Ashling should take their beating and move on, otherwise it reflects very poorly on them

I have to disagree. First off it is a mistake by Park. Whether the person knew how to spell Sergio's surname or not he should of at least made an attempt. If he had no idea what his surname was then surely he had a chance to do it when he had the card. Somebody on the team was bound to know what his name was.

From talking to the Regional crowd the general concensus is they weren't going to appeal if they found a Sergio signed with any of the Park teams but when they looked they didnt find one.

The main defence for Park seems to be that his first name was on the card. Surely that would be no difference to a card filled up with just Michael.....
If a team did that they would be slated for losing to such a stupid mistake. I see no difference here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fairkop

For starters even if his full name wasn`t on the card why would shannon hibs try and pull a fast one if they didn`t think he was signed and name or play him in the first place doh! (think about it until it sinks in).
Another valid question is what grounds did regional think they had a case for an objection after the match ie. what prompted them to look for the match card immediately after the game?
And for your info. sergio is his name .
The only serious doubt is where did regional get the go ahead to pursue this as you don`t go fishing for the card after every defeat checking to see is everyone signed up unless you have genuine grounds or in this case there is more going on than we know about.
One last point, if regional think they have a divine right to be in the next round that they can`t beat a div. 1b side anyway they have high opinions about themselves and hopefully the wheel will come around for them.

---

As Park were due to be the home team, match switched to Regioanl, maybe they just noticed it on the card when they were filling it out second.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Truth Meister

This seems like a very honest mistake and is a very grey area when dealing with foreigners who have much different name styles than us paddies. If he was not illegal or suspended then the result should stand. Otherwise you could have appeals based on a simple mispelling of a name. Unless there are other grounds for appeal then Ashling should take their beating and move on, otherwise it reflects very poorly on them

---

You mean Regional? Not Aisling

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by magicman

I have to disagree. First off it is a mistake by Park. Whether the person knew how to spell Sergio's surname or not he should of at least made an attempt. If he had no idea what his surname was then surely he had a chance to do it when he had the card. Somebody on the team was bound to know what his name was.

From talking to the Regional crowd the general concensus is they weren't going to appeal if they found a Sergio signed with any of the Park teams but when they looked they didnt find one.

The main defence for Park seems to be that his first name was on the card. Surely that would be no difference to a card filled up with just Michael.....
If a team did that they would be slated for losing to such a stupid mistake. I see no difference here

---

If Regional have acknowledged that Sergio Doe was on the field of play and there are no other reasons for objection other than the omission of the players surname, then I would like to think Regional would accept defeat with dignity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by balanced view

ya from what i understand park will be thrown out. the name on the card does not correspond with any player park have signed with any junior team. this has happened so many times before and you wonder why clubs have clowns filling out the match card. feel verry sorry for park players and mgt and as a club but they have broken the rules and you can see why regional have appealed. hopefully a lesson learned to everyone in Limerick league anyway.

---

lads i'm lost here ...

park filled out match card with just sergio on it no surname !!
regional are then claiming no player by this name signed for park afc is this correct..
if park afc have a player called sergio ............ signed will appeal then be rejected or can they still appeal on wrong name on match card .. :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by whitestripe

If Regional have acknowledged that Sergio Doe was on the field of play and there are no other reasons for objection other than the omission of the players surname, then I would like to think Regional would accept defeat with dignity.

---

good point WS,but unlikely.either way regional will go after their bit of carrot here.if the lad is not a signed player then by all means regional are quite right to go for it as rules are meant to be adhered to,if he is signed and they objected to his name being a problem on the card then its petty,small minded and sad.if they win their objection on those grounds they would want to make sure they themselves never make even a tiny mistake on a card coz what goes around comes.....it should be a lesson to all,fill that card out properly especially MJC ,FAI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by old git

lads i'm lost here ...

park filled out match card with just sergio on it no surname !!
regional are then claiming no player by this name signed for park afc is this correct..
if park afc have a player called sergio ............ signed will appeal then be rejected or can they still appeal on wrong name on match card .. :confused:

---

if you have a spelling wrong on the card or you have,n block named team it can be appealed.

This objection has been raised due to irregularities with the match card. If this had been brought to any other clubs attention in this situation ( The Star Reporter!!! ) , of course they would have to investigate it further. Add to this the fact that there is no Sergio registered for Park - no first , surname or middle name coming close. So to let on that Regional are being ' sad ' is way off the mark. Out of respect for the competition and their own players i'm sure that Regional had little option but to get to the bottom of it. Lastly, if Park have done nothing wrong except make a clerical error then I'm sure a ticking off will be the most they will get.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aanother

This objection has been raised due to irregularities with the match card. If this had been brought to any other clubs attention in this situation ( The Star Reporter!!! ) , of course they would have to investigate it further. Add to this the fact that there is no Sergio registered for Park - no first , surname or middle name coming close. So to let on that Regional are being ' sad ' is way off the mark. Out of respect for the competition and their own players i'm sure that Regional had little option but to get to the bottom of it. Lastly, if Park have done nothing wrong except make a clerical error then I'm sure a ticking off will be the most they will get.

---

In fairness that puts a different perspective on the issue. Mis-spelling is one thing but a totally different name or nickname on the card is a schoolboy error by park. Must be very frustrating for Davy who delegates this to others as he is playing. There is no doubt that Sergio is signed and all is above board in that respect the issue is a technical error on the match card. the ruling on this will be interesting.

I find it a bit strange that all the Park posters on here are gone so quiet this week with the news of objections ect...Ye are usually well able to fight yere corner.

Come out lads and tell us whats going on!!!!

balla vs pike is now been played at carews parks pitch tomorrow at half ten:ball:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CousinSylDolan

I find it a bit strange that all the Park posters on here are gone so quiet this week with the news of objections ect...Ye are usually well able to fight yere corner.

Come out lads and tell us whats going on!!!!

---

we have heard rumours that an objection have gone in. Have had nothing in the post so don't know for what, or if there is even an objection gone in. As it stands we are into the next round until the club hear officially anything different

Looks like the LDMC were a bit upset that the mighty Regional were beaten last weekend after the 5 'big teams' all avoided eachother in the 4th Round Draw

Shannon Town 5 Prospect Priory 2

Fai junior cup 2nd round result

castleknock 1-0 eww bessboro

fai junior cup 3rd round result

sandyhill 1-0 cavan town

updated draws

fai junior cup 4th round

st francis v kufc or castleknock
st pauls v sandyhill

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shannonman

Shannon Town 5 Prospect Priory 2

---

good result for ye.. sets up a cracking match in next round if park survive objection ...:D:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by old git

good result for ye.. sets up a cracking match in next round if park survive objection ...:D:D

---

Ya was a good result could have scored a few more I think and would have preferred not too concede but a win is a win and prospect are a decent team.

Hopefully this objection stuff will be sorted soon as I think the next round is due to take place this weekend...I know if our game didn't go ahead yesterday it was being played Wednesday in jackman.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goals4fun

we have heard rumours that an objection have gone in. Have had nothing in the post so don't know for what, or if there is even an objection gone in. As it stands we are into the next round until the club hear officially anything different

---

Fair enough... After the Shn tn win yesterday I hope all this objection stuff is bull. Park vs Shn tn would be very interesting.

For what its worth my opinion is that Regional should hang their heads if they go thru on a ruling like this... All players on the field for Park were legal and thats the bottom line.

Regional V Shannon should be a good game