Originally Posted by
derm
Thank **** for that, I know my brain is frazzled right now but I couldn't make head nor tail of it and thought it was legalese:D
That precedent that you mentioned, Birmingham Council v a.n.other, would that apply or is it a different juristiction? Seeing as a company owned by Arkaga, which itself may or may not be profitable, guaranteed the debts and not Arkaga itself, does this protect Arkaga? I mean does it matter how manner layers of abstraction are between Arkaga and the club?
Sorry for asking you to hit the books ...:o