Any arbitrary age figure one chooses to pick from the air...
Except I was talking about the :rolleyes: players...
Printable View
Thank you French Toasht. I am glad someone else finds this term objectionable. In fact, I see red when it is used and this is why I have felt compelled to mention historical facts that NB seems to gloss over. I am also livid over the treatment that the most educated man on the planet on this issue, Danny, has received in attempting to debate this issue. Threats, false truths and exclusion have pushed me over the edge.
The word idiotic has been used against my last post. I stand by it. This whole episode has galvanised my belief that there is no possible way to move this issue forward when you are dealing with individuals who have their heads in the sand. I also feel there is something sinister about characters who claim they have evidence of the FAI recruiting players. Enough talk, produce the evidence and I will happily eat humble pie.
It also angers me that on this thread in to be part of this debate, you end talking in terms of Catholic, Protestant, Nationalist and Unionist. This is not part of the world I live in and to end up using such antiquated terms I find appalling. I have mentioned before that the positive discrimination that now exists in the IFA in relation to Catholics is superficial and does not in anyway deal with the real issue, the alienation of Catholics that the IFA has failed to tackle over the years.
Finally, why are we attempting to solve an issue which was ratified by CAS after it was appealed by the IFA? Players can play for us when they want and should not be subject to any conditions to placate individuals or organisations.
Amen to that...
Exactly. It always amazes me that the CAS decision on Daniel Kearns is 27 pages long yet this thread is 140 pages in length. The CAS decision deals with the issue on eligibility in a succinct and straight forward manner, yet somehow the IFA and their fans seem unable to comprehend what the sport's governing body and the justice system have laid out in simple terms.
Ireland have qualified for the Euros in Poland in the summer, yet somehow on these boards the most debated topic is on a settled issue. As far as my interest in other international teams go, it extends no further than Spain, Italy and Croatia and whoever else we might my play in our upcoming Euro 2012/ WC 2014 campaign. The IFA and their team are about as relevant to me as Turkmenistan or Malawi.
If you want to play "historical facts", no problem.
Perhaps this is not the appropriate forum for such discussion?
The eligibility issue has been decided.
What remains is for the IFA to develop a strategy that ensures, as far as possible, that their resources are used to develop young players who have a desire to represent Northern Ireland throughout their International career.
Idiotic is to think that somehow you can change a legal decision that has been already made. CAS has deemed that all players in NI can play for us and it is not age related. Your theories are pie in the sky and retorting to insults does not in anyway surprise me. All I regret is that I reacted to your last insult. I suggest you accept reality and the self-inflicted demise of your so called national team.
This is absolutely true, however its also applies in reverse. The FAI must also adopt a similar policy, which included training camps in Northern Ireland (by proxy would be better).
There has been a long, boring and tiring campaign by OWC fans to portray the actions of the FAI as sectarian. To remove this slur completely some of these camps should be in loyalist areas of the north.
So, wanting 18/19 year olds to make a decision about their future is not wanting to change the CAS ruling? Presently, a player of any age can play for Ireland. How can you suggest this is not trying to change the CAS Agreement? By the way, your constant insults are beginning to show the reality of the situation is getting to you.
http://z5.ifrm.com/5902/57/0/e14535/e14535.gif
Relax - you'll give yourself an ulcer.
Referencing the Ulster Plantation and protestant land-grabbing, as some sort of stick to beat another member with, was idiotic.Quote:
The word idiotic has been used against my last post. I stand by it.
Indeed.Quote:
This whole episode has galvanised my belief that there is no possible way to move this issue forward when you are dealing with individuals who have their heads in the sand.
I believe this to be another distraction. I couldn't care less whether IFA officials or NI supporters representatives claim to have evidence of FAI involvement in the recruitment of NI based players. So what if they do? The FAI is only looking after their own interests.Quote:
I also feel there is something sinister about characters who claim they have evidence of the FAI recruiting players. Enough talk, produce the evidence and I will happily eat humble pie.
Welcome to NI.Quote:
It also angers me that on this thread in to be part of this debate, you end talking in terms of Catholic, Protestant, Nationalist and Unionist. This is not part of the world I live in and to end up using such antiquated terms I find appalling.
Though if you find such terms appalling, why did you reference events some 400 years ago in the context of a player eligibility thread?
Correct.Quote:
I have mentioned before that the positive discrimination that now exists in the IFA in relation to Catholics is superficial and does not in anyway deal with the real issue, the alienation of Catholics that the IFA has failed to tackle over the years.
It's inevitable that this thread continues to thrive as more and more NI based players come on board the ROI train. NB and GR, probably the most notable contributors from the Norn Iron perspective, are merely suggesting ways in which the IFA can move forward on the issue whilst protecting their own interests. The only annoyance that I share with them is this kind of 'have you cake and eat it' attitude that some on our own side of the debate seem to advocate.Quote:
Finally, why are we attempting to solve an issue which was ratified by CAS after it was appealed by the IFA? Players can play for us when they want and should not be subject to any conditions to placate individuals or organisations.
I firmly believe that the now....err....so-called.....ahem.....'Fly declaration' ;), is the most sensible solution all round.
He is not seeking to change or overturn the CAS's decision.
http://z5.ifrm.com/5902/57/0/e14535//e14535.gif.........Opps!!Quote:
Your theories are pie in the sky and retorting to insults does not in anyway surprise me.
He didn't issue any insults. You're misrepresenting him.Quote:
All I regret is that I reacted to your last insult. I suggest you accept reality and the self-inflicted demise of your so called national team.
This isn't OWC you know.
No disagreement there. It's the allegations that players have been intimidated and maybe even threatened by "elements" into playing for the FAI/out of playing for the IFA that I find a bit distasteful. Unless they are true, of course, but, in the absence of even the slightest figment of evidence, I suspect such accusations to be based in exaggerated and far-fetched fantasy.