Originally Posted by
Kingdom
Ok no problem.
I love defending, more than any part of the game. I know how to defend. The reason you defend the 6yd line is because anything central inside that (in most cases but not in some specific examples) is your keeper has that area.
The longer you camp inside that penalty box as two blocks - first line and second line) the more you become a sitting duck, especially against teams of higher calibre in comparison to our squad current level. If you’re defending in those two lines, you’ve got to move as a unit/line, and you are extremely susceptible to diagonals or arcs between the two lines, which is exactly where their two goals came from.
You’ve actually made a very good point regarding Hendrick, but the context you’re attributing to it, and the comparison with Coleman is simply baffling, for a couple of reasons.
You’re subconsciously saying that Hendrick was marking him well, which Coleman didn’t. Which is of course nonsense. What you’ve done is highlight the freedom of movement that we all know Ronaldo has licence to do, and what his “heatmap” would look like would make for interesting viewing. What is does illustrate is that it is almost impossible to retain shape and man mark the man. Hendrick of course wasn’t man marking him and keeping him quiet, he was occupying space really well in tandem with Cullen, afforded by the block of 5 behind, and the lack of space between the two ‘blocks’, if you will. Ronaldo gets stood up by Hendrick, he lays off, pushes on and Hendrick can simply let him move inside to be a defenders problem, and continue to occupy space for whichever Portugeezer becomes the creator.
there is a post on this thread that sort of alludes to Coleman stopping Ronaldos runs (plural), and I’m going to the Liberty of understanding that he is somehow mixed up in the first goal - which of course he isn’t.
The first goal is a single movement or phase that is staggered, and it’s primarily Shane Duffy who loses Ronaldo: Duffy follows the movement of the winger while a Ronaldo applies the breaks and is in the space between the two lines. Duffy loses the man and compounds Mcacleans error.
The second goal is pox hard to defend against because of where the first movement breaks down from, and the reversed direction of the second movement - this is accentuated at the moment by the offside rules as they aren’t! If anything, young Andy is as much to blame as Seamus, as he’s caught under the cross and his reaction to the goal I think underlines this.
Again, should Seamus have jumped with Ronaldo? Yes. Does it look bad ? Yes. But I’m not going to hammer him for a moment of exhaustion, having been pulled from pillar to post for the previous 25/35 minutes.I’d much prefer to laud the exceptional movement of an exceptional forward. My first reaction is the cross shouldn’t be coming in in the first place.
The way our defenders like to defend, backs to the wall, in blocks, doesn’t afford a defender the scope to move significantly with an attacker like Ronaldo, and is exhausting, as the discipline must be almost total as you hold your place in the block, which opposition can interchange and move as they please/see fit. Ronaldos heatmap from last night would show exactly the difficulties in this regard.
Once they scored one with significant time left, they were scoring a second.