Printable View
Even Dunphy himself is getting bored with his pantomine spiel. How RTE have persisted with this one trick pony for so long is a mystery. The panel and presenter will have to be embalmed for the world cup qualifying campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by JGKyne
Like jbyrne said, spot on. Greece are often invoked for their 'dour yet (once) successful' qualities but in Zagorakis, Basinas et al they had the competent passers of a ball you mention. Steven Reid types if you like. We're handicapped by the quality of CM's available to us atm. I take no joy in maligning Andrews, Whelan, Green and co. but their performances are symptomatic of limited ability as much as a limited system. There's no doubt a 'grass is greener' element to such regrets, but I can't help wondering how better off we'd be had David Meyler and Steven Reid not been so familiar with injury.Quote:
Originally Posted by Murfinator
I can take or leave Sadlier at this point but it took me a while to notice the tone of his speech betrays his default position on just about everything and validates your accusation of aspirations towards the 'Dunphy seat'. He often speaks with a cadence of faux exasperation, as if whatever he's saying makes such brilliant, inarguable sense that he resents having to say it once, never mind repeat himself. Kinda irritating once you notice it.Quote:
Originally Posted by jbyrne
While I'm bitchin' about the RTE panel, anyone else find Kenny Cunningham's hand gestures and looking around distracting? How about Giles' lean-forward-whilst-adjusting-my-jacket motion? ;)
Its Kenny's eyebrow movement that annoys me :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sullivinho
Try watching Kenny's eyebrow at 6x speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sullivinho
If we qualify, he will get, (and have earned) a new contract. Any suggestion otherwise is fantasy land.Quote:
Originally Posted by elroy
We did play good football before. However it was usually naive, and we lost. Away results of any kind were few and far between. Nowadays we are unbeaten away from home for 4 years, we are extremely well organised and disciplined at the back, keeping clean sheets for months, and astonishingly, nutjobs like on the RTE panel want the coach sacked!!
We are a bit weaker in midfield alright, but it hasn't cost us that much. The goal difference remains very healthy. The 4-4-2 system is what Irish players are taught from their first day in the game, and it has brought us success. There's no need to change it while it's working. In Jack's time, we had good midfielders, but Brady got the cold shoulder, McCarthy was famously slow, and Aldo couldn't buy a goal. Instead he was running around after wild goose chases putting people under pressure for 4 years. Our two goals in the Italian WC, came from 2 long punts from the keeper. Did the nation care? It had an fn party watching it.
We're a long way off-topic now, but as it turned out, losing to Russia wouldn't have been a disaster playoff wise, given the Slovakia-Armenia result, and we're in a much better position than both of them going into next month. Trap has taken the team a long way from scraping winners out in San Marino, to the brink of qualification. He wants to be here for the next campaign, and hopefully he will be.
I agree we have come a long way with Trappatoni from scraping wins in San Marino, but thats really head in the sand stuff and avoiding the major issue that has arisen from the last 2 games. I think when our midfield gets so overrun like it did on Friday - people are entitled to ask questions like; are we getting the most from the players we have available? One of the big cogs in the defensive structure favoured by Trap is a solid, competitive, combative midfield capable of holding thier own at this level. When we look at the level we were overrun on Tuesday, and the level to which we were inable to create anything at all on Friday night from a central position, - you have to wonder why we persist with the players we have in the middle.Quote:
Originally Posted by mypost
My honest opinion from here on in is that if Trap persists with these two in the midfield we will not be capable of either a) beating Armenia at home and b) even if we scrape into the playoffs we won't have the ability to beat a decent team in the palyoffs, and Trap will fall on his own sword.
Now is the time to make the change, recognise we are fortunate to still be in contention, and seize the opportunity. - get Steven Reid out of retirement and get McCarthy in along side him , now you have 2 midfielders in the Trappatoni mould who are capable of holding onto the ball when we need to attack and have enough experience / quality not to get overrun when we are away from home. Do I think this will happen - no, but he may stick McCarthy in, just in time to save his own skin. If he thinks he can qualify with what we have then we are finished, and he'll lose his job anyway.
Armenia won a game 4-0. Congratulations to them, but they started out this group lower than Macedonia for a reason, and they're a long way from the same ability as Russia.
Russia are a good side, and even with us playing a different formation, would have outplayed us on Tuesday, because that's what they do to everyone in Moscow, even the best teams with the best players in the game. England lost the last time they were there, and duly failed to qualify. He likes Andrews and Whelan in his midfield, and it's got him results. For all their quality, fancy flicks and tricks, Russia had 90 minutes to score and couldn't do it. There's no guarantee other teams will either. The defence is very solid, and the forwards have scored the second highest goal tally in the group. So we're not the finished article, but we're doing ok.
I really admire your possitivity, but "doing ok" wont get us to the finals, we need something more.Quote:
Originally Posted by mypost
On the evidence of the last 6 days our midfield is not good enough to get us there. You can dress up the Russia result all you like, but we were destroyed, the fact that Russia didn't score is really no concern to us, what's relevant to us is how we are playing and more imortantly in this case - WHO we are playing, and how thats affecting our ability to qualify.
I admire Trap in a lot of ways, but this is a crack he can only paper over for so long.
who are this 'us' you are referring to? keeping a clean sheet and picking up a point was pretty relevant to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
on another night we could have lost anywhere between 3 to 6-0, would you be saying the same had that happened
Read the whole post in context and don't be picking bits out to suit some argument. No one was more delighted than me with the point, believe me, but I'm sure everyone agrees that the result was achieved, in spite of our midfield duo, not because of them, and I'm arguing - if we are to qualify the problem needs to be addressed.Quote:
Originally Posted by zero
It wasn't another night, it was Tuesday night, and for all their domination then they couldn't score. Them's the breaks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Acornvilla
Arsenal go to Old Trafford, play attacking football with a weaker team, compared to the opposition, and get hockeyed, leading to calls for the manager to be sacked.
Ireland go to Russia, play defensive football with a weaker team compared to the opposition, and get a point, leading to calls for the manager to be sacked.
Go figure
They are 2 awful naive ways of looking at things.
9/10 games you would lose that game. We will lose a game like this next time we play with this approach against equal or superior opposition to Russia.
It really is astonishing how people can just brush this aside as though we got a point, luck and swings and roundabouts and forget the whole bigger picture. Its too sad to be laughable.
They're not naive ways, and it's not laughable.
On the contrary, too many whingers are well and truly pised off that we didn't lose and so they couldn't write Trap's obituaries. We are 6 points away from a playoff, and a Slovakia win against Russia, from the finals. That's what counts now, and that is the bigger picture.
The interesting thing is that if Slovakia do beat Russia we go into the last game knowing win will see us topping the group and qualifying.
However if we do not win, ie draw or lose we would finish in 3rd place.
Alternatively if Russia win then I think a draw would be enough to guarantee us a play off place.
All this is based on my analysis of the group so don't take it as gospel as I have been wrong before, or at least not right. :p
So a Slovak win could be a double edged sword.
I do not know if this has been discussed before, perhaps it hasn't because my
analysis is wrong?
Double edged me hole :) you don't look twice at the gift horse of the century.
Lets say, I'd take my chances 100 times out of 100, to stake all on having to beat Armenia to top the group than to go for safety of joining the play-off roulette.
Slovakia beating Russia would be beyond GUBU, beyond eurolotto zillions.
Here's the permutations as they stand going into the next round of games:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiki
:confused::confused::confused:Quote:
Here's the permutations
Lets just keep it simple. We know what we have to do. Don't do it, and we're getting ready to face Germany in 12 months time.
Well I can certainly see your point, however when you consider Armenia beat Slovakia 4-0 and how we struggled against SlovakiaQuote:
Originally Posted by geysir
it would seem impossible for us to beat Armenia!!
The other side of that is we did beat the 1-0. The only 'decent' side we beat!!
Anyway perhaps we should concentrate on beating Andorra first, one step at a time and all that, we can't assume anything in this group.