Printable View
Just read on The Guardian website that the home of Issa Amro who featured in Theroux documentary "The Settlers" was raided by at first Israeli military then a group of settlers. Seems to nothing more than pure vengance. See link for more https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-r...ux-documentary
And it goes on and on. Since the last postHUNDREDS of people, not terrorists, people have been murdered by Israel, the USA and Britain.
Genocide, Holocaust, it doesn’t matter if the victims aren’t white apparently
I used to say it in jest but the best thing that the Palestinian people could do is have a mass conversion to Christianity.
Islam certainly hasn't done much for them ~ Or Islamic Countries either !Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fly
I’m not talking about what Islam has or hasn’t done for them. What I mean is that the American (and European) reaction to the conflict would probably be very different.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanfhear
I had taken that in to consideration, but decided to add my own thoughts to your point ~ Obviously your points stands on its own ~ And, mine may also be worthy of debate, particularly how little help, that Islamic Countries give to the Palestinians !Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fly
I don't think the European reaction to the conflict is based on religion. I think it's based more on money. Possibly embarrassment at what happened in World War II also.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fly
Judaism has a long connection with old money in America, so it carries a lot of influence in the halls of power there.
Either way, the support it gets is increasingly baffling.
The Saudis put a fair bit of money into Palestine afaik (which is unfortunate as they also push their nasty brand of conservative Islam on them too.)
The European reaction is much less important, hence the brackets. But I mentioned it in response to Dermaboh's claim about skin colour being a factor in the ongoing suffering over there. And it's a claim that probably has some, or a lot of, merit to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
It does, but as a counterweight to a suffering 'Christian' nation I'm not sure how far that influence would go. This is all a kind of speculative counterfactual nonsense anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
With Trump's latest round of deal making in the Middle East that support may begin to wane a bit, but who knows?Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
I don't know about the skin colour claim to be honest. It's a very popular idea in the social media age to be obsessed by skin colour, but I don't think there's much real evidence for it here. I guess in wars you have to "other" the enemy and things like skin colour and religion are handy ways of doing that, but it doesn't necessarily answer the question of why there's so much support for Israel in the first place - and I think the US is supporting Israel rather than opposing Palestine here. And the US has backed Israel for decades - literally back to its inception, when it was the first country to recognise Israel.
I do think money is a big factor - Israel buys lots of US weapons for example; gotta keep those sales pipelines open. Possibly there's an element that having reliable weapons orders keeping R&D sharp is an extension of the cold war; Russia supports Syria because it buys lots of Russian arms for example.
Interestingly, I wonder how different the reaction to Russia would have been Poland, the Czechs and Sweden not openly boycotted them in the World Cup playoffs. Russia also provides a lot of wealth to the west (in terms of financial investments from the oligarchs) and also heating fuel, which is fairly important. But the boycott really called FIFA's bluff, and then other sports really had to follow, and there's been no valid reason for going back since then.
It's an intuitive thing I suppose, and something which will therefore vary from person to person; from a non-existent feeling in some to a very potent one in others.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
The evidence for it is the mere fact of it. Palestinians are Middle-Eastern people with brown skin, almost all of whom are Muslim (whether that be culturally so or strict adherents, and everything in-between). They're 'othered' by default in other words.
Money, strategic interests in the region, arms sales etc explains a lot of the support. Cultural factors also feature...I had a conversation with a Baptist friend of mine the other day who quoted from Deuteronomy saying that the Israelites are God's chosen people. He shares the same forebears as a lot of the supporters of Israel in the US do.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Interest in the region will never wane either because that region is the crucible for the Abrahamic religions. It's not just that there's history there. It is History in a sense. I've often wondered if the whiteness of the Israelis themselves plays a part in the interest, relative to other conflict zones across the world. The comparative openness of Israeli society also factors into our knowledge of what's going on, which some may find a bit of a pill to swallow. So...there's a whole kaleidoscope of stuff going on there.
The Palestinians are certainly "othered" - and I find the Israelis inherently racist too. I know that's a generalisation, but in this case it seems to be true. Levison Wood, Simon Reeve and Dervla Murphy are among those who've travelled there and come away with barely a good word to say about the Israelis in general. And Louis Theroux obviously. (I've forgotten what his dad, Paul, said when he was there in the 90s - must read that one again, but I remember lots of guns)
But people will start wars for reasons other than skin colour - Russia in Ukraine the obvious example. The Brits here. The Rwandan genocide or the Saudis in Yemen if you want to mix up colour. I think skin colour can be a difference in the Middle East without necessarily being the root cause.
Religion/history in the area is certainly a big contributing factor, yeah. In that regard this is just a modern Crusade.
But I think the US (and the Europeans, by extension) would have supported Israel whoever it picked on. I think the Israelis are racist, but that doesn't necessarily explain the support they get. I can't imagine what goes on in world leaders' heads. Are they convinced by Israeli PR? Or are they playing a bigger game (or Game, I guess, to parallel your post!)?
None of the following is intended to give Israel a free pass on the genocide that is now undoubtedly being committed - but - doesn't the matter of support for Palestine have a lot to do with the fact that it is borderline impossible to support a state that is led by a terrorist organization - especially one whose mandate is to destroy a long time supposed ally of the West? I think it has far more to do with that obstacle than it does with specifically race or religion. All that said, the natural question then becomes how can they support a murderous, genocidal regime whose land grabs have been no less illegal than, say, Russia? The West needs to dramatically rethink and shift its relationship with and support for the Israeli state. Early days, I felt that Israel was justified in its response to the October massacre but any support i had then petered out pretty damn quickly. Unforgivable what is happening there.
I feel a Life of Brian sketch in the makingQuote:
Originally Posted by seanfhear
https://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/m...ons/index.html
And in the first 6-12 months of Israels aggression most aid for the Palestinians was coming from or through UAE, Egypt, Qatar & Jordan