Left out the hand ball for the peno we should have had! Other than that, good highlights.
Printable View
Two decent goals from Dundalk. Quigley's ended up having a fairly good season despite appearing a bit uninterested at different stages.
That's quigley though. Always appears to be uninterested. Sometimes is uninterested. best player in the league when he's up for it though
Which was twice at most in his entire time with us.
Spot on. The normal interpretations of body language goes out the window with Mark Quigley.
He nearly always looks disinterested, rarely celebrates goals, and generally appears as though he couldn't care less. In the midst of this, his workrate has been excellent for most of the season, he has played against medical advise, and the moments of brillance that he consitently produces are a joy to watch.
Quigs has played well for Dundalk this year (and scored some fine goals) but was rubbish last season at Bohs, even on the few occasions he was played up front. Perhaps his confidence was dented by Nutsey playing him out of position so often as he often struck me as a confidence player.
This seems to be the opinion of many Bohs fans. Interesting to hear Dodge's opinion of him being "one of the best" whenever he watched Bohs last year. He was also the standout player for Bohs against Dundalk in a league match in Oriel playing on the wing.
Poor reflection on Fenlon as a manager if what you say is true!
that banner is clearly saying that their feces is not super
I think the key difference is the freedom he has playing for Dundalk. He enjoys having a free role and having the play revolve around him. He needs good one or two touch players around him. He is arrogant but he has the skill and puts in the workload to carry it off. The only time he struggled with Dundalk this year is when he had to play wide on the left when we had injuries or suspensions there.
It is a joy to see a player like Quigley at his best. It is what football is all about and players like Quigley are a rare commodity in the LOI.
I take it this 'player ineligibility' question has proven to be unfounded since nothing has come out of this meeting today?