The Cork City thread is titled "...winding up order..." whilst this thread is "..a wind-up order" :) :) ;)
Printable View
The Cork City thread is titled "...winding up order..." whilst this thread is "..a wind-up order" :) :) ;)
such horse manure ,the club took a proposed budget to the fai which was rejected anything else is spin. and the fai is not there to tell you what to spent its only there to tell you if you are plans are ****.
my first point still stands if you need somebody else to tell you what should be your budget your a fool.
what is it with lOi clubs that they need someone else to tell them what they will spend by the end of the year compaired to what they will take in. do the ****ing basic maths.
I don't think it is particularly important whether the FAI rejected/declined/recommended a revision or advised that the first draft would not be acceptable etc etc. The bottom line is that the process seems to have had the desired effect and the Drogheda budget presumably will now come in line with what the FAI deem acceptable - though passerby's point that this should not be necessary is entirely valid
The reality for seven or eight of the premier clubs is that it's really all about financial survival and retaining premier status this season. Trying to get the foundations right to work towards bridging the gap to compete with Bohs and Shamrock Rovers and doing so on a solid financial footing in the seasons ahead is the bigger picture.
Agree with Ezekial, if there is a lesson in this it's that the FAI are doing their job as advisors, this may sound dumb but it's how it works in North American sports leagues and for most of them it seems to work. The old Quebec Nordiques used to survive off trading players and lump sum investments from separatist Quebecqois, until the NHL enforced a pre-budget rule that saw the club fail in 11 instances within 1 season, as a result they were denied a licence, the franchise taken from them, given back to Denver where the Colorado Avalanche inherited an already good side and went on to win the Stanley Cup in their first year. The point is that if the authorities advise and apply rules evenly, then there can be no argument or come back if a club is denied a licence or fined/docked points, otherwise we're going to keep suffering more courtroom dramas year on year.
RELAX, I was referring to questions that were raised here on Foot.ie. believe it or not I genuinely hope that there are no problems at Galway (although the "you are doing it worse than us" was not considered a defence for Bohs). given the names linked ith Galway it is hard to beleve the budget is less than last year but happy to take your assurance
Anyway, we all know Nick leeson would not break the bank ! :cool:
According to the sun today
- Drogheda's budget will be reduced by 30% on the initial budget
- Alan Matthews will stay on as manager
- Conor Kenna and Ross Gaynor are the only players to pack up and leave
- The rest of the squad will accept the paycuts
I do have to laugh at some of the Drogheda fans here falling for their boards horse**** about the sudden collapse of their budget after Christmas, fact is Drogheda outbid Pats for Gareth O'Connor just 2 weeks ago after they were due to submit their budget to the FAI. Drogheda have set another precident that you can snap up players offering fantasy wages you know you cannot pay and go back on it just in time for the season to start leaving players with little option to find a new club on the same money because clubs have signed up all their squads, a magnificent tactic to get a good squad on the cheap, at the players expense of course.
Mathews decides where the wages go, thats his choice, not the board's. Besides, the players are still free to leave and join other clubs (as two of them have chosen to do). The board are just doing now, what should have been done a month or two ago (although they claim there are various reasons that this didn't happen). They also claim that Mathews was kept informed of how the budget was shaping up almost on a weekly basis, whether you believe that or not, it was still him that offered the wages.
Personally, I wouldn't blame anyone for leaving with the financial situation so uncertain. Its like any business nowadays, the situation changes every week.
Verbal contracts and all that?, If a player has a contract that is not honoured then the club cant get a licence surely.
touché
come on macy, it s not aimed at people with actual points, you know they posters its aimed at. There was a good discussion for the most part in the thread with views being expressed fromthe drogs positon (agree with them or not) and counter views being presented back. I thought it was quite refreshing. Unfortuantley that life cycle of the thread seems to be over and the drama queens are out in full force.
No probs at all with points of view which differ but come on, some people claiming we shouldnt get a licence because a verbal understanding is apparently the same as an FAI signed, santioned, approved contract, others claiming it was all part of the plan to outbid other clubs - for me this type of stuff is comical and really did make me laugh - had a right old giggle at it (some if others want to post the same, I would personally welcome it).
Thread unlocked. It'll be locked again (or posts will be infracted) if we get onto stupid conspiracy theories on the title, misrepresenting of posts (I don't think anyone's claimed this is a deliberate ploy by Drogheda to sign better players than they could otherwise afford, for example) or generally unneccessarily aggressive posts (such as calling other posters illiterate). Your call.
Guess we'll find out tomorrow if they made the necessary changes... Wonder will the license only be given to clubs fully sorted or will some clubs get them on conditions
If you have a problem with any post, report it.
Do we know when the announcement will be or shall I wait to be riled by Off The Ball later?