Originally Posted by
LOI101
I see his point but don't think he offers a realistic solution. If all clubs agreed to prevent low release clauses, any player with ambitions of going over the water would just sign a one year deal and leave for nothing at the end of the year. What is a low release clause anyway? How much is it? In my mind the value of the release clause should have some relationship to the value of the player's contract. Why should a player sign a contract with a higher release clause that would be multiples of the what the club think the player is worth when they're sitting down to negotiate his wages?
I see the problem for the clubs but I'd be firmly on the side of players here. Would be interesting to see what the PFAI would think of such a proposal.