Originally Posted by
littleman
Im not meaning to sound like im makin a joke of this but the Aul has,nt done much to raise the standard off refs over the years has it,so where are they comin from on this.
The man in question was a refereeing accessor,his opinion deemed important enough to say wether a ref was up to the grade or not,yet the Aul say hes not good enough to ref in the Aul,who do they think their kiddin.:confused:
Not one club has put in an objection,not one so for me they have no place saying no to this bloke.:mad:
The idea was for the Aul to have its clubs best interests at heart,not its individual commitee member/members interests.:mad: