Originally Posted by
DeLorean
Yeah it's not so much that he can't, but he's just not as effective. Athleticism is one thing but a lot of his running is off the ball and finding pockets further forward, he wouldn't be the type that would control a game from the middle. He's more Frank Lampard than Paul Scholes! For Derby, he's at his best when himself and Hughes are given license to roam forward by the inclusion of a holding midfield player. His best game for us was undoubtedly the friendly against Italy, when himself and Meyler rotated the defensive/attacking responsibilities, with Hoolahan supporting Long up top. That was a two man midfield of sorts, depending on your perspective, but I think the combination of Meyler's defensive awareness and Hoolahan's natural instincts to drop deep suited him down to the ground. He started in a more conventional two man midfield in Glasgow and I really didn't like the look of it before a ball was kicked. On paper anyway, it was a conventional 4-4-2 with two recognised strikers in Long and Walters, even if Walters was dropping to the wing to win knock-ons to nobody. Hendrick's role was definitely a more defensive one which would certainly have suited Quinn or Meyler more, if you were to go down that road. We were outnumbered and outplayed and it was avoidable beyond belief, even acknowledging the absences of Whelan and McCarthy.