don't think this is all accurate
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ldid=101181831
Printable View
don't think this is all accurate
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ldid=101181831
:D Good stuff :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaucyJack
Seems about right ;)
Oh dear! Some poor Cardiff fan has worn his weenie out. :rolleyes:
There was a similar scurrilous entry about Cheryl Cole (neé Tweedy) which claimed 'She is married to the footballer Ashley Cole, but eveyone knows that it is a sham marriage as Tweedy is a racist and Cole is a homosexual.' It was removed after a day. It's now 'temporarily protected due to vandalism.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheryl_tweedy
I think Wikipedia needs to sort out its contributors before it gets a seriously large libel bill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse
Wikipedia is wrecked when you have posters like that. Destroys the whole basis for online source.
I read a story about one of the original developers of Wikipedia is setting up a rival site, but only people who are recognised experts in the topics will be allowed to edit them.
Wouldn't mind being an expert in Cheryl Tweedy ;)
If only she were as easy on the ear as the eye. You'd not hear a mouth like it if the fleet had just docked.Quote:
Originally Posted by tetsujin1979
It's a joke. Wikipiedia is flawed anyway. It has to be when you rely on a poster for information. Who's to say they're right all the time? It was funny in the context it was meant.Quote:
Originally Posted by OwlsFan
you have to cite your sources or wikipedia will delete the article or just your section.Quote:
Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse
It wasn't though. It was the work of some puerile, hormone ridden 13-year-old who has just discovered the whole concept of "gay".Quote:
Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse