How long would you give O'Connor?
I'm not advocating removing O'Connor from his position at this early stage of the campaign, but how long would you give him to turn things around? Five games? Ten games? The rest of the season? Four more years? Normally I'd never bring this topic up, but there were a lot of mixed feelings in regards to his appointment in the first place, not to mention the manner of his appointment. Mix all that in with unpopular decisions like leaving Jimmy Fyffe go, replacing him with what is turning out to be a dud of a keeper (I haven't seen either away game, but all reports back place at least two goals per game squarely on Mooney's shoulders), signing CP O'Brien against the fans wishes (lets face it, that poll result was a bit of a fix) and promising us he would deliver (which he clearly hasn't, again going on reports from last night and the Cobh game, plus what I saw myself at the Mons game), but also refusing to drop him despite these lacklustre outings. But if things don't improve how long would you give it til a lot of fans start venting their frustrations? And will he be sacked if the results don't follow (remember those rumours that his name is on the lease at Hogan Park?) Personally I think he should be given a season, if things aren't working out there should be a change in manager. With any other club I'd say only giving a new manager only a season is idiotic, but after all the promises that were made of Premier football in three years, drastic improvments on and off the field and the CP/Fyffe **** ups thats what I'd give him. But then again I've never been a fan anyway!