Do City Really need a new ground?
I was just reading last nights echo and it qoutes Mr. Michael O'Leary as saying that he would like city to have ..."their own place rather than being tenants ast Turners Cross..". I suppose in one sense it would be nice to have our own place where we wouldnt be have to be consulting the demi-gods of the munster league. But I dont see that the arrangement that we have at the moment is inhibiting the club. I rather see it as extremely beneficial. The stadium is really taking shape and with the upcoming introduction of floodlights it will surely be a stadium to match and even surpass the facilities at Tolka Park. Its obvious that City are anchor tenants and I cant see any reason to move as citys heart really does now lie in Turners Cross in my own humble opinion.To move the team to a new venue would probably undo a bit of the fanbase they have built up in recent years. I know the prospect of a move even if it did happen wouldnt take place for at least 3-4 years at best but I thought it was a question worth pondering. I myself am happy with Citys arrangement at the Cross and I think that any move would have to be in the clubs best interests rather than just playing on the sentimental aspiration of "having our own place".At least Micheal realises that a move outside the centre of the city would not be in the clubs best interests.Buy back Flower Lodge and I might be convinced!!