todays echo.ken o connor at it now

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ken o connor gives his verdict on players so far this season,not that we give a sh!t what he thinks but he seems have to jumped on the fenn-hating bandwagon

devine 7/10
lordan 7/10
murphy 8/10
woods 7/10
murray 6/10
bennet 7/10
o brien 9/10
kearney 7/10
doyler 8/10
nwanko 7/10
fenn 5/10
georgie 6/10
flynny 7/10
behan 6/10
sweeney 6/10


now how the fcuk he manages to rate woods,murray,nwanko,flynny,behan and sweeney better than fenn this season,ill never know

what a fcuking @sshole


the rag has came up trumps again

Ah, it is all relative. Colin obviously impresses him. TBH, his work rate and battling be-everywhere attitude probably earns that high score. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thecorner

now how the fcuk he manages to rate woods,murray,nwanko,flynny,behan and sweeney better than fenn this season,ill never know

---

Was gonna say maybe he only seen Euro games but Fenn was better in thsoe than league.

:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thecorner

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ken o connor gives his verdict on players so far this season,not that we give a sh!t what he thinks but he seems have to jumped on the fenn-hating bandwagon

devine 7/10
lordan 7/10
murphy 8/10
woods 7/10
murray 6/10
bennet 7/10
o brien 9/10
kearney 7/10
doyler 8/10
nwanko 7/10
fenn 5/10
georgie 6/10
flynny 7/10
behan 6/10
sweeney 6/10


now how the fcuk he manages to rate woods,murray,nwanko,flynny,behan and sweeney better than fenn this season,ill never know

what a fcuking @sshole


the rag has came up trumps again

---

its called his point of view, everyone is entitled to it, if everyone agreed all the time what would the point of debate :confused:

is there anywhere on line i can read his stuff to get a feel of what he view on city is, heard it being talked about but haven't seen it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by max power

its called his point of view, everyone is entitled to it, if everyone agreed all the time what would the point of debate :confused:

.

---

if u ever read the echo you would know that one of our "proud :eek: " sponsors love to diss the club

if you sponsor a club, then you expect a return on your investment in the form of sucess.....unlike other sponsors the echo have the means to let their feelings be known......

if you read these boards not all comments are positive, why should the echo's be....just a thought. but saying that, i can't remember our local paper being negative about de town.

Max power, why do you care so much? Why are you so obsessed with the mighty Rebel Army?

As for Ken O'Connor's comments, the muppet obviously hasn't a clue what he's talking about. I don't think he was at any of the away games games in Europe so he didn't see any of Fenny's magnificent performances. Therefore he does not really have right to comment.
Fair play Neale Fenn, you've done well since signing for City, keep up the good work and fcuk the begrudgers!

With the exception of the bit about Fenn, I actually thought the piece was pretty good and fairly accurate.

He is completely off the mark about Neil, but the rest isn't too bad.

fenn was taken off, right? so he got a lower mark cause everyone else played mroe than him. is it that hard to understand?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GavinZac

fenn was taken off, right? so he got a lower mark cause everyone else played mroe than him. is it that hard to understand?

---

It was a rating for the season as a whole not just for the other nights game.

well then fenn was shocking at the start of the season, i know he was settling in but actually performance wise he wasnt worth a 6. since just before europe he's come on an awful lot.

why all the hostility to the echo/examiner reporters. i don't get either paper but what are they saying that a few here don't like. is it just a case that some persons here don't like anyone other than themsleves having a opinion? (just curious, before i get any more cwap from eanna et al) :D

How did Ken O'Connor manage to come up with all these ratings and not include John O'Flynn. How can you give a rating for Sweeney, Nwanko, Behan & co (players who have managed about 90 mins each on the pitch all season), and give Fenn a score of 5 and not rate John O'Flynn. Was he afraid to use a number lower than 5? Even Joe Gamble should have been included based on minutes played over some of the above.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GavinZac

fenn was taken off, right? so he got a lower mark cause everyone else played mroe than him. is it that hard to understand?

---

Can you read?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by patsh

Can you read?

---

no, im using a voice recognition / text-reading device. no wonder they have me writing for ucc newspaper.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GavinZac

no, im using a voice recognition / text-reading device. no wonder they have me writing for ucc newspaper.

---

Explains why you don't understand what is written in the Echo so......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cathal

why all the hostility to the echo/examiner reporters. i don't get either paper but what are they saying that a few here don't like. is it just a case that some persons here don't like anyone other than themsleves having a opinion? (just curious, before i get any more cwap from eanna et al) :D

---

Have a look at recent issues of the echo and all will become clear. In particular, have a look at an article by a guy called daly about a week after the Nijmegen game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fair_play_boy

by a guy called daly

---

WHO??? :D :D