Have offered less for Forrester than Pat's but he is looking at overall situation before deciding (game time etc).
I do know Bohs did not even try to compete with Shels for Cronin but, as we know, Shels would never overspend :rolleyes:
Printable View
[QUOTE=CSFShels;1565430]In terms of money. One would hope that Bohs aren't even paying players 200 a week in their current state.[/QUOTE]
I presume you do realise Shels would not have got a licence last year except for a guarantee by Bohs on access to Dalymount ?
Bohs historic deficit will not be addressed except through (another :p) sale of Dalymount. We are guaranteed we will have use of Dalymount for full season (unlike Shels at Tolka).
Bohs have reduced our budget to ensure we do not add to our deficit by incurring more losses, would be more concerned at Shels apparently bigger budget given crowds etc for both clubs.
Every time marino? You're going to have a pop at opposition fans evrytime they mention Bohs, even though you agreed with him?
I responded to the question raised about Bohs (as you noted) and asked about the equally relevent question regarding Shels budget (without using terms like "***ed or"the state they are in").
If you dont like a post/poster dont read/respond to it/them. If its me I promise I wont be concerned and save your lecture for somebody interested in your opinion. As you rightly point it "anyone can talk about what they want" so dont need you to decide on the matter for us.
As hilarious as saying "anyone can post what they want" and then whining because people dont post as you think they should ?
Anyway, time to move on Dodge so thanks for your "advice" on how I should post and rest assured it will get the consideration it merits :rolleyes:
As this is obviously personal I suggest, if you wish to continue it, move to PM and spare everyone else the tedium.