http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16056514
Apparently Cambodia held the previous record for not being able to form a government.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16056514
Apparently Cambodia held the previous record for not being able to form a government.
A Belgian colleague here told me that the country was running itself better in this time than for a few years previously. I don't fully believe it, however I wonder why the pressure to get it sorted now.
Also, the whole Flemish/Walloon faultlines would have come closer to the ultimate split if the formation of a national government had proven impossible - the Flemish leader of the largest party was more concerned with regional issues than being PM, so they've ended up with a Walloon PM, even though they're less than 40% of the overall population.
Aw, I was rather enjoying their experiment with neo-anarchism.
Incidentally, I heard what paudie said from a Belgian a few months back, so I presume it's right.
No decisions or changes would be made to public services - things would just plod on. The problem comes if there's stuff that needs a decision. Did the previous executive remain in place in the meantime? i.e. here the last Government was still our executive - and making (in some cases shocking) decisions - until the new Government was formed.
Yeah, the old PM, Leterme, was the caretaker for the last 18 months, even though he didn't stand at the last election - could you imagine if you'd gridlock like here, and Cowen was still Taoiseach?
And the UK were in full panic mode because they didn't have a coalition formed within 3 hours of the results of their last election. Many facepalms were performed by myself and all my friends who had seen PR work perfectly well in other nations.