Originally Posted by
Shedzer
A few bad games (2-3) out of 7-8 doesnt make a proven player at this level a bad player all of a sudden. Kendrick was one of the household names and best players Drogs had, when they were winning the league and had a proper good team together.
To answer the closed ended question (which is basically an 'im right and your wrong because you didnt see it' type bullsh*t), i wasnt in Drogheda tonight
But iv seen enough of Kendrick to know he has alot to offer. Firstly, he is better than who he replaced in Holmes, so theres your starting point.
Its pretty clear than Kendrick has lost pace however, which means he doesnt get forward as much and has to give himself that yard extra. He still reads the game reasonably well and uses the ball well when on it. Remember not every fullback we have is Seamus Coleman or Chris Butler. Kendrick defends well and is in general solid, there are obviously some negatives with him as with most players but to go and make a comment which insinuates that Kendrick should be kicked out the door basically is ignorant,
Did you see his performance v Bohs on Tuesday, i presume so, if you did you cannot tell em that he was anything other than solid.
So you that made the journey, what was so bad about Kendrik?