lads who are that "32" group on WHUFCs' kit?
Printable View
lads who are that "32" group on WHUFCs' kit?
Don't they just have their squad numbers on the front, as their XL sponsorship was cancelled a few weeks ago?
I saw that. It's very strange looking. They look like those 118-118 guys. Wouldn't sticking on a charity sponsor be a better option? I suppose they bought the kits with sponsors on in bulk so they've got to do something to mask it.
It's all squad numbers, hence why Di Michele had 32 on his chest but Etherington had 11.
I hope Rovers1 was taking the mick?!
He'll claim so anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker1982
West Ham have no sponsors?!
How'd that happen?
XL Airways gone belly up.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
They were sponsored by XL the travel company that went bust.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Didn't make the link there, sorry! :o
Didnt the same thing happen with Charlton a few years ago when AllSports went bust?
As an aside, one of the funniest football-related sights in many years for me has been the sight of corpulent Hammers fans with XL plastered all across their fronts. As if they needed reminding. :D
:ball: PP
no i wasnt, i dont watch MOTD, so i just saw reports in paper, and saw a lad with "32" on his kit, so presumed they all had.:oQuote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker1982
West Brom also have no sponsors on their jerseys i noticed. Any story behing this?
Nope. just can't find anyone willing to pay thier price.Quote:
Originally Posted by Inside Man
That league is on its knees... ;)