PDA

View Full Version : What does Christianity, 911 and The Federal Reserve have in common?



jockser
04/07/2007, 1:30 AM
Absolutely Great film here(imo:) ). Its 2 hours long but a much watch.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331

What do you think?
In my opinion
Part1: Was gobsmacked but not too bothered since im not very religious and always thought of religions as just a law book anyway
Part2 : Well put together the events of that day and the research still going on today
Part3 :Very informative and alot of things i didnt know. LOL what will happen in America when they find out there is no law stating they have to fill out a tax return?

Anyway i thought it was good even if you dont believe it all but it makes you think


But as the film creators state themselves.... http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
"That being said, it is my hope that people will not take what is said
in the film as the truth, but find out for themselves, for truth is not told, it is realized"

gufcfan
19/07/2007, 1:21 AM
for truth is not told, it is realized"

those are words everybody should live by

strangeirish
19/07/2007, 1:39 AM
Part3 :Very informative and alot of things i didnt know. LOL what will happen in America when they find out there is no law stating they have to fill out a tax return?


The federal tax laws are contained in the Internal Revenue Code, also known as Title 26 of the United States Code, which is the compilation of laws passed by the Congress.The Internal Revenue Code is the law that requires people to pay taxes.

A. Sections 1, 61, and 63 impose the tax,
B. Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
C. Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return

What I found interesting was that the two ex-IRS workers said they both hadn't filed tax returns in years. If you are owed a refund, you have up to three years to file for it otherwise you lose it. I'm just wondering, are these two paying their taxes and not filing for a refund for some reason?


Sorry, I was bored!
:D

gilberto_eire
19/07/2007, 2:02 AM
The federal tax laws are contained in the Internal Revenue Code, also known as Title 26 of the United States Code, which is the compilation of laws passed by the Congress.The Internal Revenue Code is the law that requires people to pay taxes.

A. Sections 1, 61, and 63 impose the tax,
B. Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
C. Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return

What I found interesting was that the two ex-IRS workers said they both hadn't filed tax returns in years. If you are owed a refund, you have up to three years to file for it otherwise you lose it. I'm just wondering, are these two paying their taxes and not filing for a refund for some reason?


Sorry, I was bored!
:D

ooh so in relation to the american law about income tax which no-one is the documentary could find(as its not in the constition), your saying that you've found it??.
did you actually watch the documentary or even read the specific part properly??... it does state there is a law but its NOT COMPULSARY but its been spun to ppl to sound MANDATORY!!

strangeirish
19/07/2007, 2:19 AM
ooh so in relation to the american law about income tax which no-one is the documentary could find(as its not in the constition), your saying that you've found it??.
did you actually watch the documentary or even read the specific part properly??... it does state there is a law but its NOT COMPULSARY but its been spun to ppl to sound MANDATORY!!
You can read it all here (http://uscode.house.gov/download/title_26.shtml)if you like and yes I did watch the documentary. Title 26 section 6012. (http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+1820+2++%28%29%2 0%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%286012%29%29%3ACITE%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20) Now, I'm no tax expert, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn express last night.Click (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIFfXpjNJU&mode=related&search=)

Edit: No need for CAPS. I can read. It makes you come across as very condescending.

gilberto_eire
19/07/2007, 2:39 AM
You can read it all here (http://uscode.house.gov/download/title_26.shtml)if you like and yes I did watch the documentary. Title 26 section 6012. (http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+1820+2++%28%29%2 0%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%286012%29%29%3ACITE%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20) Now, I'm no tax expert, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn express last night.Click (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIFfXpjNJU&mode=related&search=)

Edit: No need for CAPS. I can read. It makes you come across as very condescending.

i didnt say you couldnt read but i was highlighting two keys words!!. that document is massive no way im reading it. im sorry but im gonna stick with the views of the ex-IRS agents etc.... who must know more then an irish man, they showed the part that showed it wasnt actually mandatory but was optionary...its porob somewhere in that massive page!!

strangeirish
19/07/2007, 2:56 AM
but im gonna stick with the views of the ex-IRS agents etc.... who must know more then an irish man, they showed the part that showed it wasnt actually mandatory but was optionary...its porob somewhere in that massive page!!
I'm not going to argue with that, but...

Some tax protesters and others opposed to income taxes cite what they contend is evidence that the Sixteenth Amendment was never "properly ratified." One such argument is that because the legislatures of various states passed resolutions of ratification with different capitalization, spelling of words, or punctuation marks (e.g., semi-colons instead of commas) from the text proposed by Congress, those states' ratifications were invalid. A related argument is that various states illegally violated procedural requirements of their constitutions when passing their ratification resolutions. Another argument made by some tax protesters regards Ohio, one of the states listed as ratifying the amendment. They contend that because Congress did not pass an official proclamation in 1953 (see Ohio Constitution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Constitution)), Ohio was not a state until 1953 (and, therefore, could not have ratified the Sixteenth Amendment). These and similar arguments have been universally rejected by the courts.

Bald Student
19/07/2007, 3:22 AM
Is there any possibility that there was a badger involved in all of this?

Peadar
19/07/2007, 9:25 AM
Is there any possibility that there was a badger involved in all of this?

gilberto is badgering the strange one. :D

cheifo
19/07/2007, 4:32 PM
Badgers...Why do people in this sick world always blame the badgers.

strangeirish
19/07/2007, 7:36 PM
gilberto is badgering the strange one. :D
I think the badger got butchered!;)