PDA

View Full Version : Squad Numbers


gustavo
17/09/2006, 11:15 PM
just adding players squad numbers to players profiles on the official site here
http://www.sligorovers.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=16&Itemid=71
can people let me know the number of any players i left out or if i got any wrong Thanks.
feo123
18/09/2006, 12:21 PM
brush is 16, kelly 19!! dono bout coleman!
gustavo
18/09/2006, 12:32 PM
Thanks feo
SligoBrewer
20/09/2006, 9:42 PM
if foyzer was 4
you could have his shirt layed out like thus

____FOY
_____4
___IRELAND.

It'd b class!
gustavo
20/09/2006, 10:01 PM
You could do that with McNamara
feo123
22/09/2006, 10:32 PM
not rele....he's not good enuf for ireland!
roversforever
23/09/2006, 7:33 AM
not rele....he's not good enuf for ireland!

never mind ireland,he's not good enough 4 sligo rovers.
feo123
23/09/2006, 10:25 PM
well....thats an argument! he is prety dodgy! the weak link IMO of the back 4 but he is good enough for rovers!
roversforever
24/09/2006, 2:40 PM
well dats just my opinion!look at the league table and you'll see that there is a problem at the back.we've conceded way too many goals.also ave doubts about peers.
gustavo
24/09/2006, 3:18 PM
Well by that logic you must presume that we should be top of the league .I think our defence have done well enough particularly Burns and Foy
roversforever
24/09/2006, 3:32 PM
Well by that logic you must presume that we should be top of the league .I think our defence have done well enough particularly Burns and Foy

no i don't presume that we should be top of the league..if you do what i suggested and look at the league table you'll see that we have conceded a lot more goals than the teams around us.ya burns and foy have been good,im not arguing about that.i stated that mcnamara and peers are the dodgy ones and i think its an area that will need to be looked at when the end of the season comes.
gustavo
24/09/2006, 3:55 PM
Fair enough but its a bit unfair to say that he isnt good enough for Sligo Rovers . He was more than good enough for us last year and by all accounts turned in a good performance last night
sligoman
24/09/2006, 4:02 PM
Fair enough but its a bit unfair to say that he isnt good enough for Sligo Rovers . He was more than good enough for us last year and by all accounts turned in a good performance last nightLots of players were good enough for us last year, doesn't mean they would be now. Remember, we've been promoted now, it's a big step up! McNamara is a very good First Division player but can be a very dodgy Premier Division player in my opinion. Also not a great captain, much rather Burns or O'Grady to replace him as captain.
roversforever
24/09/2006, 4:03 PM
Lots of players were good enough for us last year, doesn't mean they would be now. Remember, we've been promoted now, it's a big step up! McNamara is a very good First Division player but can be a very dodgy Premier Division player in my opinion. Also not a great captain, much rather Burns or O'Grady to replace him as captain.

thank you!!finally somebody agrees!!
SligoBrewer
24/09/2006, 4:07 PM
Lots of players were good enough for us last year, doesn't mean they would be now. Remember, we've been promoted now, it's a big step up! McNamara is a very good First Division player but can be a very dodgy Premier Division player in my opinion. Also not a great captain, much rather Burns or O'Grady to replace him as captain.

o'grady imo..

he's been at the club longer than any other player now, i think is it:confused: (mcnamara)
TheBoss
25/09/2006, 11:11 PM
Seamus Coleman - 11
Emyln Mulligan - 21

I think that Jason McCartney was 11 before he went on loan so now I think that Coleman has it.

I do not know John Bellew's number, think it is 13.

And also, does anyone know what number Steve Feeney was before he left in July.
DonalE
30/09/2006, 5:24 PM
Think Bellew is 27 but not certain
Red4Eva
03/10/2006, 8:18 PM
Think Bellew is 27 but not certain

i thought "belllew" was no.9 jamesie!
SligoBrewer
03/10/2006, 8:25 PM
flannery's 9!
cash wore it as well for a game.(might have been the 1 got injured in)
Red4Eva
03/10/2006, 8:36 PM
flannery's 9!

i know ya but jamesie knows what i'm talkin bout
feo123
05/10/2006, 10:15 PM
bellew is 21! defo! choice is 27! steve Feeney was 18 before he left 'the boss'!!
TheBoss
05/10/2006, 11:21 PM
bellew is 21! defo! choice is 27! steve Feeney was 18 before he left 'the boss'!!

Thanks.

On this game report on bray wandererers site, says that Mulligan was 21, http://www.braywanderers.com/reports.php?game=547
Redzer
06/10/2006, 9:04 AM
bellew is 21! defo! choice is 27! steve Feeney was 18 before he left 'the boss'!!

Was Bellew not No 23 last night?
Rory H
06/10/2006, 9:09 AM
he doesnt have a set number........
DonalE
08/10/2006, 5:06 PM
Yeah,Bellew was 23 but red4eva he'll be 9 next year and the year after and when he retires Rovers will retire the number 9 shirt!!!
sligoman
08/10/2006, 5:17 PM
Yeah,Bellew was 23 but red4eva he'll be 9 next year and the year after and when he rerires Rovers will retire the number 9 shirt!!!You're not Bellew are you?:p.
feo123
09/10/2006, 8:10 AM
bellew was 21 away in waterford anyway??!! they must not have a set number for him!