View Full Version : Sligo Rovers 0-1 UCD
DmanDmythDledge
05/08/2006, 1:20 AM
Brilliant performance tonight. Mahon had the tactics almost spot on. Outplayed Sligo for most of the match. They had a bit of pressure in the second half when we sat back but our defence was superb. Quigley only had one save to make apart from the penalty I think. Kenna and Tony Mc won everything in the air. Great performance from the new signing Crowley and Finn was a good link between midfield and attack.
The Stars
05/08/2006, 10:00 AM
Brilliant performance tonight. Mahon had the tactics almost spot on. Outplayed Sligo for most of the match. They had a bit of pressure in the second half when we sat back but our defence was superb. Quigley only had one save to make apart from the penalty I think. Kenna and Tony Mc won everything in the air. Great performance from the new signing Crowley and Finn was a good link between midfield and attack.
you got to be taking the biscuit?
outplayed us?were you at the match:eek:
We were all over ye in the first half but wouldnt shoot.had one shot in the first half.
How many times did UCD students go down in the second half with nothing wrong with them...disgrace.
Your no.10 was class,whats his name,the long haired guy.
Fair play to the UCD fans,sang their hearts out for the whole game,would have been no atmosphere without ye:rolleyes:
DmanDmythDledge
05/08/2006, 1:11 PM
you got to be taking the biscuit?
outplayed us?were you at the match
We were all over ye in the first half but wouldnt shoot.had one shot in the first half.Sligo did nothing in the first half. Only played long balls half time that came to nothing. You only did anything decent when the ball came down the right wing. I thought Cash was your best player in the first half. We were much the better side in the first half. We had numerous shots on goal that could have led to goals, you only had one.
Second half we sat back and defended better than you attacked. I think that would mean that we outplayed you.
How many times did UCD students go down in the second half with nothing wrong with them...disgrace.The only unsportsmanship from UCD players was when Quigley was taking goal kicks and when Crowley tried to stop a free been taken.
Your no.10 was class,whats his name,the long haired guy.Finn was our no.10.
Fair play to the UCD fans,sang their hearts out for the whole game,would have been no atmosphere without ye:rolleyes: Sure didn't the 1,100 Sligo fans make plenty of noise.:rolleyes: Only started making a bit of nosie in the last 10/15 minutes. So much for the intimidating atmosphere in the Showgrounds.
Finally a win. Yesss. And a striker on the scoresheet. We're gonna stay up; oh hold on everyone is, or isn't as the case may be?
Rory H
05/08/2006, 3:27 PM
ye didnt out play us.....even your manager acknowledged that but you deserved the victory because ye had the ability to put the ball in the net and we didnt
if you are coming all the way from dublin to support the team why not sing instead of just sitting...your fans left me with a new found respect for the dublin city fans....
Poor Student
05/08/2006, 4:37 PM
The match reports are saying we were deserved winners and particularly dominated the first half. The Ocean FM commentary also thought Sligo had a poor first half.
Seems like Finn is proving to be a top quality player for us. Looks like Mahon's team has done it again.
Red&White Rover
05/08/2006, 5:20 PM
The only unsportsmanship from UCD players was when Quigley was taking goal kicks and when Crowley tried to stop a free been taken.
wat about the time, when your keeper, tried to diving head the ball/kill darren mansaram, in your box, then feign injury himself?
DmanDmythDledge
05/08/2006, 6:05 PM
wat about the time, when your keeper, tried to diving head the ball/kill darren mansaram, in your box, then feign injury himself?
Ye I forgot about that. Should have been a free to nobody I thought as well.
pineapple stu
05/08/2006, 6:58 PM
We were all over ye in the first half but wouldnt shoot.had one shot in the first half.
:D
You've got to love quotes like this!! Sligo were utter muck in the first half - no ideas, just hoof it up to the front line and hope something bounced their way. We knocked it about far better and were comfortable at half-time. Wouldn't often use the word outplay, but it was correct in this case. Not only had we the better of the play, but we were teaching you a footballing lesson as well. I was wondering how on earth youz were fifth in the table at half-time!
In the second half, Sligo had far more pressure, but again, we created the best chances on the break. Sammon really should have scored that one in injury time.
Got to love Sligo fans slagging UCD fans for being quiet (bodhrán was banjaxed, which didn't help) - where was that cauldron Conor Kenna was promised?!
I had heard for ages about the retribution on UCD.....:D
pineapple stu
05/08/2006, 7:05 PM
And Sligo proving that they weren't a circus act? :p
pineapple stu
05/08/2006, 8:17 PM
UCD's remarkable record against Sligo Rovers was continued on Friday night when a lone Conor Sammon strike was enough to secure a fifth straight win in the Showgrounds, and send the Bit O' Red spinning to a first home defeat in over a year. The win was no more than College deserved, as they outplayed their hosts for long spells.
Pete Mahon made two changes for the game - Derek Doyle was back in on the left wing for Darragh Ryan, while new signing Paul Crowley slotted in in centre-mid, with Ronan Finn moving into an attacking midfield role and Paul Byrne dropping to the bench in what appeared to be a 4-4-1-1 formation. Finn caused Sligo plenty of problems in an inspired performance, while Crowley had an impressive debut, having signed from Dublin City in midweek.
The game was open from the off, with Sligo getting the first sniff at goal after a slip from Conor Kenna let Mansaram get space, but the UCD defence closed down very quickly to clear. It was an uncharacteristic mistake from Kenna in what, ultimately, was a towering performance as UCD ended the game repelling all that Sligo could throw at them.
UCD's first real chance came just two minutes later when Finn played through Conor Sammon, but the Sligo defence got back just in time to get a vital deflection to Sammon's shot. And the Sligo defence had to be alert again on 27 miuntes when Crowley's dinked pass almost put Ronan Finn through on goal, but this time, Richard Brush in the Sligo goal was out quickly to snuff out the danger.
Sligo's attacks came almost exclusively from long balls thumped down the pitch to their strike force of Darren Mansaram and Brian Cash, and UCD's defence coped with ease, while the Students were playing far more ball. And they were rewarded on 39 minutes with the lead goal - Paul Crowley found space on the right to send over a cross for Conor Sammon who, unmarked, sent a superb looping header over Brush and into the far corner of the net.
The goal stung Sligo in action, and within two minutes, Brian Cash cracked a 25-yard drive off the post with Darren Quigley beaten. However, in keeping with the general trend of the first half, UCD promptly outdid their hosts when giong straight down the pitch and hitting the woodwork twice; first Conor Sammon thumped Alan Mahon's low cross off the post before Derek Doyle smakced the rebound off the bar. When Sligo eventually cleared, it was only as far as Finn, whose drive from the edge of the box was inches wide.
At half-time, UCD were in control of the game and looking comfortable. However, Sligo were much improved in the second half and, after Paul Crowley sent a shot just wide for UCD, they were awarded a soft penalty when Bosnian Fahrudin Kudozovic went down under Alan Mahon's challenge. In truth, Mahon's hand was on his opponent's back, but the Sligo player certainly needed no second hit the ground. Keith Foy stepped up and, with Darren Quigley advancing a good two or three yards off his line, stalled his run-up, causing Quigley to slip. Despite this, Quigley still recovered to save Foy's penalty, which was low and to the keeper's left.
The miss seemed to spur Sligo on, and they came more into the game as it went on. Quigley was forced into a good tip-over from a header from 12 yards, while a free on the edge of the area was just over as well. However, it was by no means all Sligo, and Ronan Finn sent a volley narrowly over as UCD's counters on the break grew ever more dangerous.
On 77 minutes, Mansaram was sent clear on the left. His first attempt to cross ended in him falling over, but he recovered to beat Alan Mahon and rifle in a shot, which Tony McDonnell took full in the face to deflect over. McDonnell needed treatment and was ultimately substituted eight minutes later in obvious discomfort, with Brisn Shortall replacing him.
Darren Quigley nearly gifted Sligo an equaliser when his short goal kick was returned with interest; Quigley raced out of his box to head clear, but collided with Mansaram in doing so. Curiously, the referee awarded a free out in what appeared a genuine accidental collision.
As the game neared injury time, Sligo were threatening UCD constantly, but the defence was majestic, winning everything in the air and often setting dangerous counterplay through McWalter, Dicker and Finn. As the fourth official indicated five minutes of injury time, one counter saw a long clearing ball out of defence fall perfectly for Sammon, 40 yards out but behind the last man and with a clear run on goal. His shot was weak, however, and Brush saved well with his feet. Two minutes later, a mazy Gary Dicker run took him into the box only for his shot to be blocked; agonisingly, he and Sammon got in each other's way of a clear shot on goal.
It mattered little in the end as the referee blew up with UCD's goal still intact. The win extends UCD's unbeaten run against Sligo to 12 matches over 8½ years and sets Pete Mahon's charges up perfectly for a crucial trip to Longford next week.
UCD - Quigley; Mahon, Kenna, McDonnell (Shortall 85), McNally; Crowley, Dicker, McWalter, Doyle; Sammon, Finn. Subs not used - Hussey, Ryan, Byrne, Kavanagh
Att - c 1100
Schumi
05/08/2006, 8:33 PM
I don't think we pi$$ed on Sligo or anything but I do think we were the better side. We looked more dangerous in the first half even if we didn't create too many good chances. Sligo had more of the ball in the second half as we sat back a bit more but they didn't have too many chances either.
Finn (#10 mentioned above) was fantastic, some great touches of skill and used the ball well which can be a problem with skillful, tricky players sometimes. Kenna and Dicker were excellent too. The only performance I was disappointed with was Podge, he's wasted on the wing. If we're going to play him it has be up front IMO.
sligoman
06/08/2006, 9:48 AM
It was a terrible performance from both teams(certainly our worst of the season). If DmanDmyth etc. is saying what a great performance ye had then I'd hate to have seen ye in previous games cos ye were brutal(just like us:()
CollegeTillIDie
06/08/2006, 11:40 AM
Long overdue win; long overdue away win; need another three (away wins) before the season ends. And we also need to start winning at home again.
pineapple stu
06/08/2006, 12:19 PM
If DmanDmyth etc. is saying what a great performance ye had then I'd hate to have seen ye in previous games cos ye were brutal(just like us:()
Yeah, we've had some poor performances of late. But there's no denying we played well on the night.
Rory H
07/08/2006, 3:43 PM
The win extends UCD's unbeaten run against Sligo to 12 matches over 8½ years .
im looking forward to our 3rd meeting:)
lefty
08/08/2006, 12:05 PM
Did Harpal Singh play against us and if he did was he any use?
pineapple stu
08/08/2006, 12:33 PM
He came on with about 20 minutes to go. Gave Podge a bit of a tough time, but Podge looked knackered for some reason.
John83
08/08/2006, 2:43 PM
He also shoved either Podge or Alan Mahon in the chest and wasn't so much as booked.
He was fast, and he got in one excellent cross, but he wasn't as much trouble as he might have been.
sligoman
08/08/2006, 3:03 PM
He also shoved either Podge or Alan Mahon in the chest and wasn't so much as booked.Don't even start about players not getting booked!:mad:.
Count yerselves lucky that yer sub goalie didn't have to come on.
Schumi
08/08/2006, 3:05 PM
Count yerselves lucky that yer sub goalie didn't have to come on.
Yeah, that vicious foul on him could have made him go off the pitch. :D
You got 5 minutes of injury time anyway so I don't think you missed out on much.
Rovers1
08/08/2006, 8:39 PM
The win was no more than College deserved, as they outplayed their hosts for long spells.
:eek: :rolleyes: obviously someone studying journalism at ucd wrote this,i really cant understand how people think ucd outplayed rovers. best thing about UCD was their front 2..2 great players btw. Rovers were terrible though in fairness,although they definetly werent outplayed,i can only remember dick brush having to make 2-3 saves
pineapple stu
08/08/2006, 8:53 PM
Show me a report which says we didn't thoroughly deserve the three points. We were clearly the better team and played most of the football and to better effect. Add all of that together, and we outplayed youz.
Rovers1
08/08/2006, 9:30 PM
im sorry if thats what you think,and its your opinion but i just dont see how you can think that, UCD played alot of sloppy football
Rovers1
08/08/2006, 9:33 PM
but Podge looked knackered for some reason.
if your knackered marking Faz then youre pretty unfit!!..its like marking a player with no legs!
Aberdonian Stu
08/08/2006, 9:52 PM
Also there is no journalism course (at least not on the CAO or as a Masters) in UCD.
Oh and I heard there might be a postgrad diploma but I haven't seen any proof to back this up.
pineapple stu
09/08/2006, 12:57 PM
I'm sorry if that's what you think - and it's your opinion - but I just dont see how you can think that. UCD played a lot of sloppy football.
[Post cleaned up to add some sort of sense]
Something to do with me watching the game, I'd imagine. Nobody's claiming we were like Brazil, but compared to your tactics of hoof it up to our defence, we outplayed you.
Rovers1
09/08/2006, 2:25 PM
Nobody's claiming we were like Brazil, .
:eek:
sligoman
09/08/2006, 11:18 PM
Show me a report which says we didn't thoroughly deserve the three points.Here (http://www.sligorovers.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=153&Itemid=88).
[Post cleaned up to add some sort of sense]
we outplayed youz.If you're going to correcting grammar then where's this in the dictionary?:rolleyes:.
Poor Student
09/08/2006, 11:32 PM
Here (http://www.sligorovers.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=153&Itemid=88).If you're going to correcting grammar then where's this in the dictionary?:rolleyes:.
There's a wee bit of a difference between there being an absence of proper punctuation and someone using an informal variant of the second person plural, a word which is known to cause confusion due to it being identical to the second person singular.
You cite your own official site as an example?:confused:
sligoman
09/08/2006, 11:34 PM
You cite your own official site as an example?:confused:He asked for a report that stated we were better. He got one. Sean Connor watched the match just as much as the rest of us, and more really.
DmanDmythDledge
09/08/2006, 11:34 PM
Show me a report which says we didn't thoroughly deserve the three points.
Here (http://www.sligorovers.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=153&Itemid=88)
Sean Connor is talking absolute b0llocks. How can you take his comments seriously:confused:
pineapple stu
10/08/2006, 12:48 PM
Show me a report which says we didn't thoroughly deserve the three points.
Here.
That's not a match report; that's a manager interview. You may as well take Wenger's waffling as a match review.
Here's some actual reviews for yez -
Eleven-a-side (http://www.eleven-a-side.com/ucd/irish_soccer_detail.asp?newsid=23792) - “Sligo were all at sea”
FAI (http://www.fai.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=881&Itemid=9) - “UCD were the better team in [the] first half”
RTE (http://www.rte.ie/sport/2006/0804/UCD.html) - “UCD were the better team” (possibly from the same source as the FAI one)
Sligo Rovers site (http://www.sligorovers.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=152&Itemid=98) - “The visitors were well worth their lead”
Any newspaper I read the following day - Irish Times, Irish Examiner, Star, Sun - all said we were the better team and thoroughly deserved victory. The Sun even went as far as to give Sligo 6/10 for entertainment and UCD 8/10.
Anyway, in fairness to the majority of Sligo fans on the forum, I think this should be ended/split and binned. It's going around in circles and the likes of sligoman, Rogue Trader and a couple of others are only embarrassing the majority of Sligo fans who are able to accept defeat by a better team on the day.
red bellied
10/08/2006, 1:41 PM
Anyway, in fairness to the majority of Sligo fans on the forum, I think this should be ended/split and binned. It's going around in circles and the likes of sligoman, Rogue Trader, red bellied and a few others are only embarrassing the majority of Sligo fans who are able to accept defeat by a better team on the day.[/QUOTE]
Did you actually read what I posted on the Rovers section about the match?
Schumi
10/08/2006, 2:06 PM
More nonsense from Sligo: http://www.sligoweekender.ie/news/story.asp?j=29191
pineapple stu
10/08/2006, 2:20 PM
Did you actually read what I posted on the Rovers section about the match?
I apologise - you had one silly comment about UCD in general, but you're right - your match analysis was right. I've edited you out of the post. :)
More nonsense from Sligo: http://www.sligoweekender.ie/news/story.asp?j=29191
Looks almost like a copy and paste job from the official website.
red bellied
10/08/2006, 6:18 PM
[QUOTE=pineapple stu;513309]I apologise - you had one silly comment about UCD in general, but you're right - your match analysis was right. I've edited you out of the post. :)
What you believed to be a silly comment, any side that attracts 80 people to a Dublin derby doesnt deserve to be in a national domestic league away side or not.
John83
10/08/2006, 7:32 PM
What you believed to be a silly comment, any side that attracts 80 people to a Dublin derby doesnt deserve to be in a national domestic league away side or not.
As opposed to sides in substantial debt (you know, like half the league) and/or inferior football teams?
pineapple stu
10/08/2006, 8:16 PM
What you believed to be a silly comment, any side that attracts 80 people to a Dublin derby doesnt deserve to be in a national domestic league away side or not.
And Dublin City are gone.
Your quote was that Sligo would get more than us if you were in the local leagues. Our usual home fan base is about 400. You've evidently forgotten the bandwagon status of Irish supporters if you think you'd get that in the local leagues. Therefore, your comment was stupid.
red bellied
10/08/2006, 9:00 PM
Dublin City are gone wonder why.
So Ucd have a core base of 400 supporters I doubt it very much. There was 400 at the Rovers game in Belfield earlier in the season if that and with a very good chunk of that from Sligo.
So you are on the bandwagon if you are a Sligo Rovers supporter I think its the direct opposite. Rovers have alot more association and tradition with the local community than Ucd ever will therefore if they did end up in the local league the die hards would be still behind them.
pineapple stu
10/08/2006, 9:02 PM
There were 520-odd, and comment was made on both sides how poor the away support was. Certainly no more than 120.
red bellied
10/08/2006, 11:27 PM
Actually the comments on how poor the Rovers away support came from the Ucd posters on here if I remember off hand.
Poor Student
10/08/2006, 11:32 PM
Actually the comments on how poor the Rovers away support came from the Ucd posters on here if I remember off hand.
I think one of our lads relayed that a club official of yours commented on how it was a poor away support you bought that day.
DmanDmythDledge
27/08/2006, 12:51 AM
Pete Mahon in the Limerick match programme;
"Our victory over Sligo was particularly pleasing given the post match comments of Mr Connor..." :p
Rory H
28/08/2006, 3:38 PM
if we draw each other next round of the cup sean will not be the sore loser this time
Student Mullet
28/08/2006, 3:54 PM
if we draw each other next round of the cup sean will not be the sore loser this timeIs he getting more gracious as he becomes accustomed to losing?
CollegeTillIDie
28/08/2006, 8:39 PM
Sligo, it's more than 24 years since you won in Belfield, Alice moved away from Smokie quicker than that :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.