Limerick Oscar Traynor Manager 2006

[Old keeper]

LDMC are inviting applications for new managers in the Oscar Traynor and Youths teams Any Ideas?

[abbeyvale]

LDMC are inviting applications for new managers in the Oscar Traynor and Youths teams Any Ideas?


Pa Mull Oscar Traynor manager

[lim abroad]

i don't think anybody would want the junior job,nobody takes it seriously,at least the minors put in a fair effort

[newlad]

Pa Mull Oscar Traynor manager
cool he;ll be the best man for the job:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[Old keeper]

cool he;ll be the best man for the job:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Well someone should ask him to apply

[hoops12]

Well someone should ask him to apply


why apply when he has already shaking hands on it

[Old keeper]

why apply when he has already shaking hands on it

Another story from someone who heard something from someone!
All applications will be looked at and the committee will make a decision on the best applicant.

[joeSoap]

Another story from someone who heard something from someone!
All applications will be looked at and the committee will make a decision on the best applicant.
Nobody applies for this stupid job. Who'd want it anyway. Nobody wants to play in it, and which ever clubs are doing well at the time of the games are only going to withdraw their players 'due to injury'....

It's a joke. I remember a certain now deceased Alderman from Southill being offered the job a few years back. That proved how pathetic it really is.:o

[Old keeper]

Well We are trying to raise the profile and give it some support.
Any players who are selected for an oscar traynor squad must atend or will stand suspended, if they are injured one would expect that they would not be available to their own clubs. and as regards clubs! if a club has a player involved in the squad the team is entitled to have their match postponed for that weekend.

[the only 1]

Well We are trying to raise the profile and give it some support.
Any players who are selected for an oscar traynor squad must atend or will stand suspended, if they are injured one would expect that they would not be available to their own clubs. and as regards clubs! if a club has a player involved in the squad the team is entitled to have their match postponed for that weekend.

if u dont want to play in a micky mouse tournament its the players choice

[Old keeper]

if u dont want to play in a micky mouse tournament its the players choice

I am afraid its Not, The oscar traynor is classed as a representitive game and all players registered with the league must make themselves available if requested. If clubs want to change this then they need to put forward a rule change.

[joeSoap]

The Oscar Traynor should be a pre-season tournament, run off on a purely knock out basis over a few weekends before the season starts. Players and clubs simply don't want to play in it.

[Goals4fun]

Well We are trying to raise the profile and give it some support.
Any players who are selected for an oscar traynor squad must atend or will stand suspended, if they are injured one would expect that they would not be available to their own clubs. and as regards clubs! if a club has a player involved in the squad the team is entitled to have their match postponed for that weekend.

i think it is a pity that this competition is under valued. You should have trials and each club can nominate some players to go. This way you will get at least the players that want to play. then if the manager has any favorites he should be able to ask them to play and try and persuade them. If players don't want to play let them miss it. until it is run right the players won't care. banning players for not playing makes a joke of it. At least teams with one player missing get their games off now .
How many times in the last 5 years have the oscar traynor team met up for games and didn't even know the players that they were playing with??? where would you be going with that !!

[W.R.F.C]

Banning Players Cause They Dont Want To Play Is A Load Of Crap. If U Dont Want To Play U Dont Have To. I Was Ask Before By Jaws Ryan To Go To One The Matches As A Sub And I Told Him No And Tere Was No Hint Of A Ban. Talks Of A Ban Are Only Rumours That Never Happens

[Old keeper]

Banning Players Cause They Dont Want To Play Is A Load Of Crap. If U Dont Want To Play U Dont Have To. I Was Ask Before By Jaws Ryan To Go To One The Matches As A Sub And I Told Him No And Tere Was No Hint Of A Ban. Talks Of A Ban Are Only Rumours That Never Happens

I Hate to burst your bubble but the rule stands at the moment that any player requested to become a member of the OT squad must make himself available as per rule 39 or face a 1 month suspension. I dont make these up and I dont deal in rumors. If clubs want to change these rules they are able to do so each year but never do?
Is it really such a bad thing to be selected to represent your league in a national competition?
There may have been issues in the past with the selection of players, but I for one think that if any player is arrogant enough to decline a chance to represent the league then he shoud be denied the oppertunity of playing in that league for a period of time

[newlad]

I Hate to burst your bubble but the rule stands at the moment that any player requested to become a member of the OT squad must make himself available as per rule 39 or face a 1 month suspension. I dont make these up and I dont deal in rumors. If clubs want to change these rules they are able to do so each year but never do?
Is it really such a bad thing to be selected to represent your league in a national competition?
There may have been issues in the past with the selection of players, but I for one think that if any player is arrogant enough to decline a chance to represent the league then he shoud be denied the oppertunity of playing in that league for a period of time
hear hear

[newlad]

Old Keeper, is there any names in for it can u tell us??

[Old keeper]

Old Keeper, is there any names in for it can u tell us??

Im afraid I can't say, but the decision will be posted on the website as soon as it is made.

[newlad]

Im afraid I can't say, but the decision will be posted on the website as soon as it is made.
and when will it be known do u think??

[Bonovox]

I Hate to burst your bubble but the rule stands at the moment that any player requested to become a member of the OT squad must make himself available as per rule 39 or face a 1 month suspension. I dont make these up and I dont deal in rumors. If clubs want to change these rules they are able to do so each year but never do?
Is it really such a bad thing to be selected to represent your league in a national competition?
There may have been issues in the past with the selection of players, but I for one think that if any player is arrogant enough to decline a chance to represent the league then he shoud be denied the oppertunity of playing in that league for a period of time

Oldkeeper - I have been saying for years now that the said rule is a load of crap. No need to change it at an AGM but a word of warning - if LDMC ever ban a player for not showing up for an Oscar Traynor they could find themselves in a lot of trouble in a court of law. You cannot infringe on the human rights of a player by insisting he has to play when he doesn't want to. Yes, I have taken advice on it - I suggest LDMC do likewise before someone catches them out and see's an opportunity to make a quick buck ;-)

[Old keeper]

Oldkeeper - I have been saying for years now that the said rule is a load of crap. No need to change it at an AGM but a word of warning - if LDMC ever ban a player for not showing up for an Oscar Traynor they could find themselves in a lot of trouble in a court of law. You cannot infringe on the human rights of a player by insisting he has to play when he doesn't want to. Yes, I have taken advice on it - I suggest LDMC do likewise before someone catches them out and see's an opportunity to make a quick buck ;-)

I must say that the advice you were given is flawed as any player who registers with the Limerick District League signs a form and in doing so agrees to be bound by the rules and regulations of the league, as rule 39 is a standing rule there is no issue, The league would not insist that a player play if he is unwilling but the consequences of his action will be that he will be unable to play in any league game for 1 month. I suggest your advisors revisit the matter.

[Old keeper]

and when will it be known do u think??

Should know mid August or sooner

[newlad]

Oldkeeper - I have been saying for years now that the said rule is a load of crap. No need to change it at an AGM but a word of warning - if LDMC ever ban a player for not showing up for an Oscar Traynor they could find themselves in a lot of trouble in a court of law. You cannot infringe on the human rights of a player by insisting he has to play when he doesn't want to. Yes, I have taken advice on it - I suggest LDMC do likewise before someone catches them out and see's an opportunity to make a quick buck ;-)
i would of thought if you were signing a form you sign on the pretence you obey the rules, so maybe you wouldnt win a case, sign for another league that does'nt have that rule:rolleyes:

[Bonovox]

I must say that the advice you were given is flawed as any player who registers with the Limerick District League signs a form and in doing so agrees to be bound by the rules and regulations of the league, as rule 39 is a standing rule there is no issue, The league would not insist that a player play if he is unwilling but the consequences of his action will be that he will be unable to play in any league game for 1 month. I suggest your advisors revisit the matter.


Oldkeeper, I admire your foresight on LDMC but as a relative newcomer to the scene I will let you know that LDMC rules have been the subject of much heated discussions over the years and have often been found wanting. Can you tell me at what AGM was this rule passed by the clubs? I suggest your advisors revisit the matter as mine are much more capable than the bunch you unfortunately have to work with. You have been warned! ;-)

PS Keep up the good work on the website. Its excellent!

[Old keeper]

Oldkeeper - I have been saying for years now that the said rule is a load of crap. No need to change it at an AGM but a word of warning - if LDMC ever ban a player for not showing up for an Oscar Traynor they could find themselves in a lot of trouble in a court of law. You cannot infringe on the human rights of a player by insisting he has to play when he doesn't want to. Yes, I have taken advice on it - I suggest LDMC do likewise before someone catches them out and see's an opportunity to make a quick buck ;-)

Hi Bonovox,
Your advice is flawed, as all players who sign forms to play in the LDL agree to be bound by the league rules and as the rule stands currently players will be suspended for one month if they do not make themselves available to represent the league. This is not an infringement of anybodys human rights as it is the decision of the player, but the player is aware of the consequences of his decision.
In relation to courts of law, any court will firstly insist that all avenues of appeal are used within the governing body before the court will deal with the issue, the best any player could hope for would be to have a high court injunction preventing the suspention until the appeal is heard and that would be a waste of about €5000, as under our rules once any appeal is made the player would be avalible to play until the appeal decision is made.
I suggest that your advisors revisit the issue

[Old keeper]

Sorry lads I forgot I replied to that postand just replied again!!!!!!!!!!!

[Old keeper]

Oldkeeper, I admire your foresight on LDMC but as a relative newcomer to the scene I will let you know that LDMC rules have been the subject of much heated discussions over the years and have often been found wanting. Can you tell me at what AGM was this rule passed by the clubs? I suggest your advisors revisit the matter as mine are much more capable than the bunch you unfortunately have to work with. You have been warned! ;-)

PS Keep up the good work on the website. Its excellent!

Thanks Bonovox, but I never depend on anybody for advice, I am long enough in the tooth and have been around the block a few times, with regard to the rules, each club has a rule book and while they may dissagree with these they are however bound by them and must follow the governing bodies appeal proceedure.
Even if the rule was changed in the LDL and there was a conflict, the FAI rule would over ride the local rule and the FAI rule is as follows

FAI RULE 49.
POWER TO DEAL WITH PLAYERS REFUSAL TO PLAY IN REPRESENTATIVE MATCHES
Any player selected to play in any International or other match arranged by The Association and who without good and sufficient cause refuses to comply with the arrangements of The Council for the playing of the match, or fails to play in such match, may be adjudged by The Council to be guilty of misconduct, and such player, or any Club which may be deemed to have encouraged such player to such misconduct, may be dealt with as The Council shall deem appropriate.

The Oscar Traynor is an FAI competition and that is where it would end.
I dont know what AGM the FAI rule was voted in on nor do I know what AGM the LDMC rule was voted in on but if a judge were to read both rule books then any case would be sent packing

I always have my ducks lined up. You can download the FAI rule book on the website

[Bonovox]

Thanks Bonovox, but I never depend on anybody for advice, I am long enough in the tooth and have been around the block a few times, with regard to the rules, each club has a rule book and while they may dissagree with these they are however bound by them and must follow the governing bodies appeal proceedure.
Even if the rule was changed in the LDL and there was a conflict, the FAI rule would over ride the local rule and the FAI rule is as follows

FAI RULE 49.
POWER TO DEAL WITH PLAYERS REFUSAL TO PLAY IN REPRESENTATIVE MATCHES
Any player selected to play in any International or other match arranged by The Association and who without good and sufficient cause refuses to comply with the arrangements of The Council for the playing of the match, or fails to play in such match, may be adjudged by The Council to be guilty of misconduct, and such player, or any Club which may be deemed to have encouraged such player to such misconduct, may be dealt with as The Council shall deem appropriate.

The Oscar Traynor is an FAI competition and that is where it would end.
I dont know what AGM the FAI rule was voted in on nor do I know what AGM the LDMC rule was voted in on but if a judge were to read both rule books then any case would be sent packing

I always have my ducks lined up. You can download the FAI rule book on the website


No need, I can quote it to you by by heart at this stage. Rule 49 of the FAI and rule 39 of the LDMC are completely different. Rule 49 of the FAI deals with games "arranged" by the association. Rule 39 of LDMC deals with games "arranged" by LDMC. There is a distinct difference. Again I ask the question....when did the clubs vote for this rule .........LDMC hardly sneaked it in at some stage? Surely not! My point is it doesn't have to be changed at an AGM, it is illegal in the first place and would be chucked out in a court of law. Maybe it's time to test the waters. I'll rest my case.

[Old keeper]

No need, I can quote it to you by by heart at this stage. Rule 49 of the FAI and rule 39 of the LDMC are completely different. Rule 49 of the FAI deals with games "arranged" by the association. Rule 39 of LDMC deals with games "arranged" by LDMC. There is a distinct difference. Again I ask the question....when did the clubs vote for this rule .........LDMC hardly sneaked it in at some stage? Surely not! My point is it doesn't have to be changed at an AGM, it is illegal in the first place and would be chucked out in a court of law. Maybe it's time to test the waters. I'll rest my case.

Hi

I am sorry but the rule is not illegal and as all Oscar Traynor games are FAI games the league arranges these on behalf of the FAI so there is no difference. The problem with symantics is what has our league bogged down for so long with people thinking that their interpretation of a rule is the only one that counts. I would really like to stop discussing it, but If you feel that strongly and confident then if any player refuses to make himself available for the league You should bring a test case on the rule but I would strongly advise against this as you would have to go to Munster and then to Dublin on appeal and then to court and you would be landed with all the costs as you would loose. So lets say you have your opinion and I have mine but as the saying goes Doctors differ and paitents die.
Now no more discussion lets move on

[Old keeper]

By the way one other thing that has screwed our league over the years is the number of people who feel that if you dont agree with them then you are against them. I must say that going forward we have to remember that everybody is entitled to challenge any rule and also request information from the LDL, and the fact that someone will not be of the same opinion is a good thing and will help us to ensure that all decisions are taken in a proper manner.
So bonovox keep plugging away but also please challenge these rules at meetings or AGM's where precedent can be set.

[Bonovox]

Old keeper - we'll agree to disagree. Its good to talk.

[allab]

pa mull is puttin his name forward so cant see the job been givin to anyone else

[silvercircle]

pa mull is puttin his name forward so cant see the job been givin to anyone else

pa Mul has got the job...declan Considne is his assisant

[Goals4fun]

pa Mul has got the job...declan Considne is his assisant

will be interesting to see the squad this year. wil be very different than last years as last year there were no pike players !! wonder if there will be any this year :rolleyes:

[allab]

will be interesting to see the squad this year. wil be very different than last years as last year there were no pike players !! wonder if there will be any this year :rolleyes:
keith hartnett martin o neill dec considine and colm enright were all named last year but none of them went to the games

[Old keeper]

pa Mul has got the job...declan Considne is his assisant

I suppose there is no point in my letting you guys know that the decision needs to be made when all the applicants are reviewed? Regardless of who has applied there has to be a process to follow. so lets wait and see shall we?

[Old keeper]

Old keeper - we'll agree to disagree. Its good to talk.

sure is

[W.R.F.C]

keith hartnett martin o neill dec considine and colm enright were all named last year but none of them went to the games
Hate to dig up old stuff, but are any of them band this season since they were not not band last year for not turning up

[allab]

none were banned and dec con was the only wit a genuine reason so the so called rules r a joke!

[W.R.F.C]

Hate to dig up old stuff, but are any of them band this season since they were not not band last year for not turning up
Sorry old keeper but i had to get that in, continue the good work.

[Old keeper]

Sorry old keeper but i had to get that in, continue the good work.

None of them were listed by the manager!

[Old keeper]

Pat Mullally was chosen this evening as the new OT manager for the coming season, he will announce his backroom team shortly

[lim abroad]

who else was in the running?

[Old keeper]

who else was in the running?


Now you dont really think that I am going to open that pandoras box do you?

It is not the policy of the committee to disclose all applicants

[allab]

None of them were listed by the manager!
they were on the paper in the squad for competitive games
so does that mean they were listed by the manager??

[Old keeper]

they were on the paper in the squad for competitive games
so does that mean they were listed by the manager??

The Squad lists that were given to the LDMC are the squads that we go on. Lets not be pedantic on this.

The new manager will have his own stamp on the team and I am sure that any player in the Limerick District League who is asked to represent his league will be honoured to do so. In the unlikely event that any player refuses to make himself available for the squad the existing rule will apply

[Old keeper]

Hi the 2006-2007 divisions are now posted on www.ldmc.ie

[Goals4fun]

The Squad lists that were given to the LDMC are the squads that we go on. Lets not be pedantic on this.

The new manager will have his own stamp on the team and I am sure that any player in the Limerick District League who is asked to represent his league will be honoured to do so. In the unlikely event that any player refuses to make himself available for the squad the existing rule will apply

i will believe it when i see it.
If a player gets picked and does not want to go all he has to do is go and score a few own goals. The rule can make sure they go but they still can make them put any effort in it, or stop them playing for the other team :rolleyes: bet he wouldn't be asked again.

[allab]

i will believe it when i see it.
If a player gets picked and does not want to go all he has to do is go and score a few own goals. The rule can make sure they go but they still can make them put any effort in it, or stop them playing for the other team :rolleyes: bet he wouldn't be asked again.

or say his leg is sore! surely he wont be given a scan to prove otherwise