Log in

View Full Version : Should eL break for the World Cup?



Pages : 1 [2]

micls
09/06/2006, 2:08 PM
I assume the clubs decide. The league hasn't been signed over to the FAI yet.

Yeah but there's someone in charge.....does anyone actually know for definate if the clubs voted for this??

mypost
09/06/2006, 3:32 PM
People are more likely to watch Poland v Ecuador tonight than they are an eL game.

Only the Polish community, and then again, only those who like football. Neutrals here, will only watch the big teams playing.


The eL is best to avoid competeing with the opening hype of the competition.

If you want to support your club, you will go to your game, World Cup or not. Are the GAA shutting down for the World Cup? What do you think?

1,000th post. :)

passerrby
09/06/2006, 6:04 PM
the clubs agreed last year to a break . two months later when it was pointed out at a league meeting that we had not qualified and there was no need for the break we were told it was to late as people had booked their hols etc.

micls
09/06/2006, 6:06 PM
the clubs agreed last year to a break . two months later when it was pointed out at a league meeting that we had not qualified and there was no need for the break we were told it was to late as people had booked their hols etc.

God our league is incompetent

passerrby
09/06/2006, 6:50 PM
if the FAI run the league your club will not be asked the views on something like this they will just decide and inform you by post, lets not kid ourselves the suits in merrion sq call the shots unless the clubs kick this merger into touch and then take proper control of the league.

micls
09/06/2006, 6:54 PM
if the FAI run the league your club will not be asked the views on something like this they will just decide and inform you by post, lets not kid ourselves the suits in merrion sq call the shots unless the clubs kick this merger into touch and then take proper control of the league.

Im not saying the FAI will do any better. TBH i havn't made up my mind yet.

However how hard would it have been to have 'if we qualify we take a break and if not we don't' as an option.

passerrby
09/06/2006, 7:38 PM
so easy if john d wanted it

thejollyrodger
09/06/2006, 8:15 PM
Too Late Now :d

ColinR
26/06/2006, 8:25 AM
now that the break has been and gone, and the attednances thread is showing some very very poor attendances for those that clashed with world cup matches, has anyone that voted in the thread changed their mind on the issue.

the world cup certainly seems to have had an effect on the crowds, but how much of that is also down to the loss of momentum in the coverage of the league. i had voted no intitially, but i'm now inclined to think it was a good move.

Raheny Red
26/06/2006, 8:36 AM
now that the break has been and gone, and the attednances thread is showing some very very poor attendances for those that clashed with world cup matches, has anyone that voted in the thread changed their mind on the issue.

the world cup certainly seems to have had an effect on the crowds, but how much of that is also down to the loss of momentum in the coverage of the league. i had voted no intitially, but i'm now inclined to think it was a good move.

Yep, I voted NO and I would have to agree with you. There is a big Dublin Derby on tomorrow, Shles-V-Pats, and I have not heard a thing about it. This is one of the biggest games involving these two probably since that farcical year!

Jerry The Saint
28/06/2006, 1:31 PM
Yep, I voted NO and I would have to agree with you. There is a big Dublin Derby on tomorrow, Shles-V-Pats, and I have not heard a thing about it. This is one of the biggest games involving these two probably since that farcical year!

Whatever your opinion, doesn't it seem odd that a full round of midweek games was scheduled opposite big knock-out matches after taking a complete break for the group stages:confused:

And I know this sounds like sour grapes (because it is:p ) but Shelbourne definitely seem to have gained an advantage from playing through the break as against other clubs whose players stopped training and went to Lanzarote/their local for the fortnight.

Raheny Red
28/06/2006, 1:40 PM
I read in one of the papers yesterday that the league would have been happy enough if clubs wanted to change their dates of fixtures if they clashed with one of the big games in the knock-out rounds! Either it's been farcical surprise surprise..........

stickyjoe
28/06/2006, 1:44 PM
Absolute madness playing matches last night and monday when there are knock out matches of the world cup on. Why couldn`t these of been played when the group stages were on or else in a midweek later on in the season?

Its the same next week - the league cup quarter finals are on the same nights as the 2 world cup semi finals :mad: God only knows how bad the crowds will be:(

Mr A
28/06/2006, 1:46 PM
The break was a decent idea woefully executed. Instead of avoiding the group stages the break should have covered last 16 to semi final territory.

Instead we're back and playing midweek fixtures that clash with the last 16- crazy. Even not having midweek games during this period would have made more sense.

Student Mullet
28/06/2006, 2:02 PM
I read in one of the papers yesterday that the league would have been happy enough if clubs wanted to change their dates of fixtures if they clashed with one of the big games in the knock-out rounds! Either it's been farcical surprise surprise..........Funny, I heard that UCD wants to move next Tuesday's game against Longford to Monday so as it won't clash with a world cup semi but the league won't allow it.

ccfcgirl
28/06/2006, 5:14 PM
I do think the loi should break juring the World cup .I was at the Bohs?City match last night .I think less turned out for the Bohs/City match because France and Spain were playing.

NY Hoop
29/06/2006, 10:48 AM
Yeah but its the precedent that is worrying. Next year there will be no World Cup, European Championships or Olympics. So why take a break?

We were in Kilkenny tuesday and even with 80 or so Rovers fans there it was a pathetic crowd. Of course it had to do with the World Cup but also cos it was a midweek game. If there was no break there wouldnt be a need for midweek games.

There are no advantages to taking a break. Talk of resting pitches and players is laughable.

KOH

TheOwl
29/06/2006, 5:05 PM
now that the break has been and gone, and the attednances thread is showing some very very poor attendances for those that clashed with world cup matches, has anyone that voted in the thread changed their mind on the issue.

the world cup certainly seems to have had an effect on the crowds, but how much of that is also down to the loss of momentum in the coverage of the league. i had voted no intitially, but i'm now inclined to think it was a good move.

I have since changed my mind. It is a shame that those who went to Shels last two games missed Argentina vs. Mexico and France vs. Spain (two great games).

Choosing to stay at home and watch the World Cup isn't "barstooling" imo. This is as good as football gets, everyone should be allowed to watch the big games without having to pick it over their club.

Raheny Red
29/06/2006, 5:46 PM
So if you were in Dublin now, you's perfer to stay at home and watch the TV rather than go to Tolka to support your favourite club?! :confused: :eek: :rolleyes: