PDA

View Full Version : Who said spelling was important?


Conor H
30/12/2005, 2:32 PM
Can you read this?>> >>cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was >>rdanieg. The >>phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at >>Cmabrigde >>Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod >>are, the >>olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the >>rghit >>pclae. >> >>The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a >>pboerlm. >>Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by >>istlef, but >>the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot >>slpeling was >>ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs rpsoet it. >> >>ONLY REPOST IF YOU CAN READ THIS...

Cool huh?
De Town
30/12/2005, 2:47 PM
Easy to read but its as old as the hills....saw it years ago;)
A face
30/12/2005, 3:42 PM
Yaeh, raed taht yares ago !!
M@ttitude
30/12/2005, 4:33 PM
Pretty cool though...
sligoman
30/12/2005, 4:52 PM
it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod >>are, the >>olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the >>rghit >>pclae.I think someone on here had that bit in their signature for a while.
Anto McC
30/12/2005, 5:40 PM
easily done alright!
pineapple stu
30/12/2005, 8:24 PM
It's also been completely debunked as nonsense...
ThatGuy
30/12/2005, 11:45 PM
It's also been completely debunked as nonsense...
is it nonsense though? i probably read that at about 60% of the speed of reading a normal sentence.
monkey magic
31/12/2005, 11:31 AM
true i also had little problems reading that.. therefore there must be some truth in it...
dcfcsteve
31/12/2005, 12:46 PM
[B] it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod >>are, the >>olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the >>rghit >>pclae. >> >>

Same is true for a football league table too..... :D
pineapple stu
31/12/2005, 3:50 PM
Is it nonsense though? I probably read that at about 60% of the speed of reading a normal sentence.
The leertts are caehgnd in a failry paacilrtur way. Edeilntvy, it is ibilmopsse to daeeffiinrtte beeetwn two acmnorys, for ealmpxe.
Cosmo
31/12/2005, 4:10 PM
The leertts are caehgnd in a failry paacilrtur way. Edeilntvy, it is ibilmopsse to daeeffiinrtte beeetwn two acmnorys, for ealmpxe.

that was a sh!t attempt- cant fully understand that one!!
pineapple stu
31/12/2005, 5:46 PM
Which makes it a brilliant attempt - debunking the whole thing in one go! Though I should have said aaagmnrs, not acmnorys...
Anto McC
31/12/2005, 7:19 PM
The leertts are caehgnd in a failry paacilrtur way. Edeilntvy, it is ibilmopsse to daeeffiinrtte beeetwn two acmnorys, for ealmpxe.

I got it in one,quick as if the letters were in order
M@ttitude
31/12/2005, 10:37 PM
Hpapy New Yaer
pineapple stu
31/12/2005, 10:42 PM
I got it in one,quick as if the letters were in order
Bhillsut.;)
sligoman
01/01/2006, 12:43 AM
I got it in one,quick as if the letters were in orderSame as, we must be the cool ones on this forum Anto:cool: :p.
Raheny Red
01/01/2006, 1:37 PM
sligoman

Same as, we must be the cool ones on this forum Anto


Nah, just nerds!! :p ;) :D
sligoman
01/01/2006, 3:04 PM
Nah, just nerds!! :pWell, I can't speak for my Dublin counterpart but I'm not a "nerd" at least;) :D.
Anto McC
01/01/2006, 3:13 PM
Well, I can't speak for my Dublin counterpart but I'm not a "nerd" at least

Me..........a nerd :eek: :D

Im the whole f*cking show :cool:
De Town
01/01/2006, 3:59 PM
Im a f*cking show :cool:
ah, Anto, bit harsh on yourself aren't you;)